Menu Bar

Home           Calendar           Topics          Just Charlestown          About Us

Friday, November 11, 2011

Charlestown’s 1%

Town Council Prez Tom Gentz
Who has the big bucks?
By Will Collette

OK, class war fans, today we’re going to look at Charlestown’s top bracket, our millionaire property owners. And at what they have in mind for the rest of us.

I drew the inspiration for this piece from the clueless performance of our Town Council President Tom Gentz (also Secretary of the Charlestown Citizens Alliance) when he tried to read the script attacking the state’s affordable housing law during the November 3 Planning Commission workshop. That script was clearly provided to him by Planning Commissar Ruth Platner. Watch the Clerkbase video if you don’t believe me.




By citing the large number of Charlestown homeowners whose property values have taken a hit from the recession and housing crash, Gentz is actually advancing the CCA’s version of  “class war.” He wants roughly 25% of all Charlestown residences to be declared “affordable housing,” thereby lifting any obligation on the town to try to provide its citizens with affordable places to live. You see, we won’t have to do anything more to address affordable housing needs because we have so many “affordable” houses already, so the Gentz-Platner logic goes.

There are roughly 900 potential dwellings that are currently assessed below $216,273, the magic number the Platner-Gentz Affordable Housing Deconstruction Act would deem to be “affordable.” One in three of those properties are owned by people who don’t live in them. Many are seasonal houses. 230 of them are condos. 131 of them are mobile homes.

The Gentz-Platner plan does nothing, absolutely nothing, for the people who live these 900 properties. Nothing. Zilch. Nada. Zip. It also does absolutely nothing for the vast majority of other Charlestown residents.

It still means that grown children of Charlestown families still won’t be able to find places in town to start a family. It still means almost no affordable year-round rentals anywhere in town. It still means that town employees and volunteer firefighters can’t afford to live in town. It still means that elderly folks who need to down-size won’t find affordable places to do that in Charlestown.

Very affordable - if you can afford $6 million - C-Town's most expensive
property at 21 Dowd Drive (photo from tax assessor database)
But there is one segment of Charlestown’s population who applauds the Gentz-Platner Plan to punish working families – Charlestown’s crème de la crème, it’s 1%.

There are 279 Charlestown residences assessed at $1 million or more. 80% of those properties are owned by non-residents. They like having their expensive homes and were very angry when last summer’s town reassessment figures came out and dropped the assessment value on many of those properties.

They complained bitterly on the CCA website and e-mail bleat about how unfair it was that their assessments were cut. Keeping the riff-raff out of Charlestown works for them – the fewer reminders of the real world of working people there are South of One, the more likely their properties will appreciate.

Not that their numbers are so bad.

For example, the #1 property in Charlestown is a lovely mansion assessed at $6,018,000 at 21 Dowd Drive, owned by Joseph & Barbara Walsh of Greenwich, CT. This 7,200 square foot estate sits on just under three acres of prime coastline. With seven bedrooms and seven baths, it’s a lovely getaway for one of the top members of Charlestown’s 1%.

We have 3 properties assessed within the $4 million range – two owned by people from Tennessee and one by a Connecticut person.

We have 15 properties within the $3 million range,. All are owned by non-residents: ten from Connecticut, two from Massachusetts, one from New York, one who claims Florida residence and one from elsewhere in Rhode Island.

There are 48 Charlestown properties in the $2 million range. Non-residents own 81% of them. They come from Connecticut (13), New York (8), elsewhere in Rhode Island (7), Massachusetts (5), Texas (2), as well as Tennessee, California, Florida and Arizona (1 each).

And finally, there are 212 homes in the $1 million range. Of these 164 (77%) are owned by non-residents. These non-residents are dominated, like the other categories, by owners from Connecticut (77), followed by Massachusetts (23), New York (15), Florida residents (7) and New Jersey with 4. An even dozen non-resident Rhode Islanders own $1+ million Charlestown houses.

Texas, California and New Hampshire each have three Charlestown home owners.

Virginia, Illinois, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, and Minnesota each have two Charlestown homeowners.

Rounding out the roll-call of the states, we have a millionaire homeowner from North Carolina, Maryland, Kentucky, Colorado, Louisiana, Montana and Arizona.

Among this roster of Charlestown’s elite are members of the Charlestown Citizens Alliance’s twelve disciples, the CCA Steering Committee. Three are outright members of the 1%: CCA President and Vice-President Bernice and Dr. Milton Krantz are members with a home assessed at $1,121,600.

CCA Treasurer Leo Mainelli is a 1% member with a home assessed at $1,301,500.
One of the founders of CCA as well as the RI Statewide Coalition, where he served on the board, is Tom DePatie. DePatie still serves on the CC Steering Committee and is an advocate of voting rights for non-residents. Like a lot of his neighbors. His home is assessed at $1,245,800.

Tom Gentz's lovingly restored 1966 Porsche V-12  911, 
one of two Porsches he currently owns.
Value: Priceless
Charlestown  Car Tax: zero!
Finally, there’s Tom Gentz himself. A retired health insurance executive, Gentz is not an outright member of 1% club, even though he only lives a couple of streets over from the $6 million home owned by the Greenwich CT Walshes. His residence is not assessed at $1 million or more.

However, he owns two adjacent houses in that prime neighborhood. Actually, they’re both in his wife’s name. The main residence, the one with the solar panels, is assessed at $660,900. The other is assessed at $578,300 for a total of $1,239,200.

So when Tom Gentz talks about affordable housing and how much he understands and cares, remember this number: $1,239,200. When he talks about how he wants to simplify the state affordable housing law so more unemployed construction workers can get back to work, remember this number: $1,239,200. And the two Porsches.

Remember that all of the CCA officers and a third of their board are members of Charlestown's 1%. Then ask yourself whose interests they represent.

4 comments:

  1. I've enjoyed reading this blog because the irony can be very funny (for instance, the beach toilet posts), but this one seems, at times, to go over the edge into the vicious. Not everyone south of one or on the water or with a high valuation is a millionaire, or a non-resident, or greedy, or selfish. Take me for instance. I bought my house close to 40 years ago for close to $50,000. Charlestown was well off the radar in those days and I got pond-side property, and a mortgage, for that. After a divorce and an inability to find work to support myself and my children, I migrated to another state. Always hoping to find something closer to home (and loving my home and its beautiful view) I kept my house, renting it during the year and week to week in the summer. I returned for 3 weeks in June, scraping and painting it and maintaining it as best I could.

    I was only able to return when I retired. I rehabbed the house and put on a partial 2nd story, increasing the sq. footage from 1700 to 2300. I also took out what for me seemed like a huge mortgage. Assessment-wise, not because of the house and not deducting the mortgage, but because of the pond-side land, I was one of your south of one millionaires. Briefly.

    Then came the crash. I lost a third of my retirement, but not a third of my mortgage, etc. I found a part-time job; my children help me out. No way after almost 40 years of hanging on to my house am I leaving. I'm here for the duration.

    Did I complain when my property assessment swooped down under the million mark last year? You bet I didn't; I rejoiced! My taxes took a nice hit. The more my property is not near the top of the heap, the better off I am. The more 6 million dollar homes are built, the better off others in my situation are.

    We need affordable housing in Charlestown. We need jobs. We need opportunities for the next generation of families to remain in their hometown. I've done my best to do so and it has not been easy, at all. I'm one of the 99%. I support the causes that you support. I support Occupy Wall St and if I were physically able, I'd be in a tent in Providence right now.

    I think my point in all this is that you can not know from external data who the 1% is. Take it easy, Will. Take it easy.

    For my privacy, I wish to remain anonymous.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous, thank you for sharing your story. I'm sure there are other people around town in similar situations to yours. Which is precisely why I find it so objectionable that our town leaders grovel in obeisance to the desires of the wealthy nonresident owners over the needs of year-round residents. To me, the fact that we have volunteer firefighters who can't afford to live here speaks volumes about why we need affordable housing. If you're not growing, you're dying. This town needs sensible growth, not to be frozen like a bug in amber as a summer playground for the rich.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Beth Richardson comments
    The town is not a summer playground for the rich. There are lots of middle class folks who live here. Most of the people in Charlestown are not rich, though some admittedly are.

    Whether or not volunteer firefighters can afford to live in Charlestown depends upon what these same firefighters do as their "day" jobs. To me it makes more sense to pay the firefighters more for the invaluable work they do for us than subsidize the housing of people who may make more money than most of us do (think of the 120% area median income requirement).

    All this subsidizing of state-mandated AH housing must be paid by someone, the taxpayers. If I am going to be taxed more to help someone get a home it seems to me that the homeless may be a better target than moderate income people.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Beth, I agree that the town is not a summer playground, but that is the perception for a lot of people. Invariably, when I'm at the beach in the summer, if I get into a conversation with someone they at first assume I'm a fellow tourist. Then when I explain that I actually live here year-round they usually want to know what there could possibly be to do here once summer's over. I tell them it's actually quite lovely here when all the tourists go home and they get this look in their eyes like they're picturing Danny driving his Big Wheel down the halls of the Overlook Hotel. It's really quite amazing.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated so your comment will not appear immediately.