Mark
Naison and I agree. When the Democratic Party joined the campaign to impose
high-stakes testing, accountability, and privatization, it attacked a key
element of its own base. He says it began with Bill Clinton’s advocacy for standards, testing, and accountability. Then, the Democrats threw their support behind George W. Bush’s disastrous No Child Left Behind. Then Obama brought in Arne Duncan to bribe the states with $5 billion for the disastrous Race to the Top program, which demoralized teachers, made them scapegoats, and closed thousands of schools in impoverished communities while favoring privately managed charter schools.
I argued in The New Republic that the Democratic Party paved the way for Betsy DeVos and her crusade to replace public schools with anything other than public schools. Charters under private management are the gateway drug leading to vouchers to replace public schools.
Ever since the Clinton Presidency, the
Democratic Party has been an advocate of top-down school reforms whose goal has
been to make the nation more economically competitive and reduce inequality.
Not only have these policies failed to achieve their stated objectives, they have destabilized communities where Democrats have traditionally found support, created widespread distress among teachers and parents, and given credence to the conservative critique of the DP as the province of technocratic elites who impose policies on people without really listening to them
Not only have these policies failed to achieve their stated objectives, they have destabilized communities where Democrats have traditionally found support, created widespread distress among teachers and parents, and given credence to the conservative critique of the DP as the province of technocratic elites who impose policies on people without really listening to them
Every Democratic politician who has promoted the following education policies, I would argue, has been complicit in the Party’s decline:
1. Promotion of national testing and
test based accountability standards for public schools.
2. Closing of schools which are deemed
“failing” and removal of their teachers and administrators.
3. Preference for charter schools over
public schools, especially in high poverty areas.
4. Support for programs like Teach for
America which de-professionalize the teaching profession.
These four principles have been pillars of the Democratic Party’s education policies on a national level, pushed by President Obama and supported by virtually every major Democratic politician in the nation including figures on the left of the Democratic Party such as Elizabeth Warren, Patti Murray and Al Franken.
These four principles have been pillars of the Democratic Party’s education policies on a national level, pushed by President Obama and supported by virtually every major Democratic politician in the nation including figures on the left of the Democratic Party such as Elizabeth Warren, Patti Murray and Al Franken.
What have been the results of these
policies?:
1. They have inspired a national parents
revolt against excessive testing
2. They have produced a sharp decline in
teacher morale and inspired the creation of teacher activist groups like Save
Our Schools, BATS, and the Network for Public Education
3. They have promoted an mass exodus of
the most talented veteran teachers and led to a sharp decline in the percentage
of Black teachers in cities like Chicago, New Orleans, Washington DC, San
Francisco and Los Angeles, where teacher temps from programs like Teach for
America have become the predominant labor force in the newly created charter
schools.
4. They have accelerated the
gentrification of the nation’s major cities and diluted the political power of
working class people, immigrants and people of color.
5, The have accelerated the shrinking of
the Black and Latino middle class, and the weakening of the nation’s unions.
If you are looking for an explanation of
why the power of the Democratic Party has declined sharply in a state and local
level during the past eight years, the promotion of these disastrous education
policies has to be part of the explanation.
No better example can be found of the
Party’s adherence to the voice of billionaire contributors and technocrats over
its traditional constituency into working class and middle class Americans than
its disastrous foray into School Reform.
And unfortunately, the current
leadership of the Democratic Party shows no willingness or ability to change
course on these issues.
