Question: "When you described Maduro as a lawless
president who profits from his position as President, doesn’t that also
describe President Trump at this point?"
Steve Ahlquist
United States Senator Jack Reed started his press
conference with a plea to Rhode Islanders to give blood:
Senator Reed: We’re here at the Rhode Island Blood Center, and it’s National
Blood Donor Month, so I want to urge all Rhode Islanders to come and
donate blood. I also want to thank Rhode Island, because in the wake of the
Brown tragedy, there was an incredible outpouring of individual Rhode Islanders
giving blood to help those who were injured. It demonstrates Rhode Island’s
community vitality. The officials here told me we have a higher donation rate
than most places in the country, and that contributes to Rhode Island. So let
me salute everyone who donates and the wonderful people here at the Rhode
Island Blood Center.
Turning to Venezuela
Senator Reed: First, you have to commend the
incredible courage and skill of the men and women of the armed forces who
conducted a well-conceived and courageously executed operation. There’s no
question about that. You also have to recognize, and no one should have any
illusions, that Nicolás Maduro was
a despicable figure. He had been governing Venezuela without regard for the law
and liberties. He probably was also profiting directly and indirectly from some
of the drug dealers, so there’s nothing admirable about the gentleman that I
could find. But we need to understand what this means on a larger scale.
It was very clear, when President Trump spoke Saturday, that
in his mind, this wasn’t about drugs. To many American families who have
suffered through drugs, that’s a very important topic, and they’re very
concerned about drugs. Trump indicated that he is essentially taking over a
government, regime change, taking over the country, taking their natural
resources, oil principally, for the benefit of the big oil companies that are
going in right now. This whole campaign, which started with attacks on small vessels
bearing cocaine, which also has legal issues, has transformed and now been
revealed to be Trump’s desire to not only take over a country, which is
illegal, but to extract its precious resources. That’s not appropriate. It’s
not legal either - under international or United States law.
It sets a very dangerous precedent for people like Russian
President Vladimir
Putin, who can now ask, “Why are they complaining about my attack in
Ukraine? They do it themselves.”
The Chinese, I’m sure, are very interested in what’s
happening in Venezuela because they have their eyes on Taiwan. We’re looking at
a situation that is upending the international order established after World
War II, following significant suffering by Americans and their victory in the
war. We created an international order with a primary rule: you cannot use
force against another sovereign nation. That’s Article 24 of the
U.N. Charter, and that article was totally ignored.
In domestic law, Congress has the authority to declare war.
This looks very much like a war-like effort, and Congress was not consulted.
Congress has not been informed of many operational details. In fact, under the
law, the Secretary of Defense, Peter Hegseth, is required to issue us execute
orders (ex-ords) for all these operations: all the boat strikes and everything
else. He’s refused to do that, even though it’s the law.
You have an administration that repeatedly defies the law,
destabilizes international relations, and whose efforts will lead to a very
complicated situation. You have the President, on one hand, saying he’s going
to occupy Venezuela. You have Secretary of State Marco Rubio trying to walk it
back, saying, “Oh no, we’re going to cooperate with them.”
We’ve seen this story before. There was a great military
triumph in Iraq under George W. Bush.
Twenty years later, we were still trying to extricate ourselves from what
turned out to be a major geopolitical mistake that cost the lives of many
service members. We have to be conscious of that now.
For weeks now, I’ve been telling everyone in the
administration, the real question is, “What are you going to do when you win?
Mr. President, what are you going to do? Are you going to occupy? Are you going
to cooperate? Are you going to send troops in again, as he threatened last
Saturday?” We’re in a very precarious situation, one that demonstrates the
Trump Administration’s disregard not only for international law but also for
the laws of the United States. It’s now time for Congress to step up and make sure
that what is done in the future is both legal and in the best interest of the
United States - not just for a weekend of headlines, but for the future of the
country.