Progressive Charlestown
a fresh, sharp look at news, life and politics in Charlestown, Rhode Island
Saturday, February 7, 2026
Rhode Island House Considers Hit List for Invasive Plants
Removing alien invaders
By Rob Smith / ecoRI News staff
Is it time for Rhode Island to ban the sale of invasive plants?
It’s one of the bills under consideration this month as the
General Assembly’s annual session gets underway.
Members of the House Environment and Natural
Resources Committee heard legislation (H7071) introduced by Rep. Jennifer Boylan, D-Barrington,
that bans a list of nonnative invasive plants from being imported, sold, or
distributed in Rhode Island.
“We’re only one of four states without a prohibited plant
sale list,” Boylan told the committee. “We’re the only state in New England
without such a list.”
Invasive plant species are a growing problem in Rhode Island. A plant is considered
invasive if it was introduced into a region it’s not known to be native, can
reproduce and spread without human effort, and actively causes harm to native
species.
Invasives, whether on land or in waterbodies, typically
grow much faster than their native counterparts and crowd out natives. Unlike
native species, which have native predators, invasives typically have nothing
to keep them from spreading.
These invaders also have knock-on effects toward animals and
insects. Native milkweed plants are the primary food source for monarch
butterflies in the Northeast, but black swallow-wort, an invasive species, can
be mistaken by the insects as milkweed. Butterfly larvae can’t mature due to a
toxin on the swallow-wort, preventing them from becoming fully grown monarchs.
American College of Physicians condemns CDC rollback on surveillance of infectious disease
Leaves hospitals and doctors to "fly blind"
By American
College of Physicians
Edited by Sadie Harley, reviewed
by Robert Egan
An audit of U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) public databases found that nearly half of routinely updated federal health surveillance systems had stopped or delayed updates in 2025, raising concerns that gaps in data, particularly on vaccinations and respiratory diseases, could undermine clinical guidance, public health policy, and public trust.
The findings are published in Annals
of Internal Medicine.
Researchers from Vanderbilt University, University of North
Carolina, Chapel Hill, and Boston University School of Law aimed to identify
which CDC databases had unexplained pauses in updates and evaluate how common
such pauses were among frequently updated CDC databases.
They reviewed the CDC's public data catalog in October 2025,
examining more than 1,300 listed databases and focusing on those that had
previously been updated at least monthly.
Using each database's stated update schedule, they
classified whether updates were current or paused. Of the 82 databases that met
inclusion criteria, 46% had halted updates, most for more than six months. The
majority of paused databases tracked vaccination-related information, while
others covered respiratory diseases and drug overdose deaths.
Winter storms don’t have to be deadly
Winter is not over - be prepared for the next big storm
A powerful winter storm that left hundreds of thousands of people across the U.S. without power for days in freezing temperatures in late January 2026 has been linked to more than 80 deaths, and the cold weather is forecast to continue into February. Several East Coast states are also facing a new winter storm, forecast to bring several inches of snow the weekend of Jan. 31.
The causes of the deaths and injuries have varied. Some people died from exposure to cold inside their homes. Others fell outside or suffered heart attacks while shoveling snow. Three young brothers died after falling through ice on a Texas pond. Dozens of children were treated for carbon monoxide poisoning from improperly used generators or heaters.
These tragedies and others share a common theme: Winter storms pose multiple dangers at once, and people often underestimate how quickly conditions can become life-threatening.
I’m the associate director of the Hazards Vulnerability and Resilience Institute at the University of South Carolina, where we work on ways to improve emergency preparedness and response. Here is what people need to know to reduce their risk of injury during severe winter weather.
Prepare before the storm arrives
Preparation makes the biggest difference when temperatures drop, and services fail. Many winter storm injuries happen after power outages knock out heat, lighting or medical equipment.
Start by assembling a basic emergency kit. The Federal Emergency Management Agency recommends having water, food that does not require cooking, a flashlight, a battery-powered radio, extra batteries and a first-aid kit, at minimum.
![]() |
| In addition to these basics, a winter emergency kit should have plenty of warm clothes and snacks to provide energy to produce body heat. National Institute of Aging |
In wintertime, you’ll also need warm clothing, blankets, hats and gloves. When you go out, even in a vehicle, make sure you dress for the weather. Keep a blanket in the car in case you get stranded, as hundreds of people did for hours overnight on a Mississippi highway on Jan. 27 in freezing, snowy weather.
Portable phone chargers matter more than many people realize. During emergencies, phones become lifelines for updates, help and contact with family. Keep devices charged ahead of the storm and conserve battery power once the storm begins.
If anyone in your home depends on electrically powered medical equipment, make a plan now. Know where you can go if the power goes out for an extended period. Contact your utility provider in advance to ask about outage planning, including whether they offer priority restoration or guidance for customers who rely on powered medical equipment.
Friday, February 6, 2026
Racist Trump Denounced for Sharing Vile Video Depicting Obamas as Monkeys
Trump is truly FUBAR
![]() |
| A screenshot of the video Trump shared |
As reported by The Guardian, the racist
depiction of the Obamas was part of a longer video that featured “false and
disproven claims that ballot-counting company Dominion Voting Systems helped
steal the 2020 presidential election” from Trump.
The outrage over the post was immediate, even as
Trump’s racism is
well known and documented over many years.
“The most foundational racist idea is likening Black people to apes,” said Howard University historian Ibram X. Kendi in a social media post. “Since humans evolved from an ape-like ancestor, racist ideas cast white people as the most evolved people and the furthest away on the evolutionary scale from apes. Racist ideas cast Black people as the least evolved people and the closest on the evolutionary scale to apes. Almost all racist ideas build on this foundational one expressed by Trump.”
URI researchers launching local stone wall study
Natural Resources Science faculty hope to examine the environmental legacy of New England’s iconic stone walls
| An iconic New England landscape feature is now the subject of focus for URI researchers, launching a study of local stone walls. (URI Photo / Amy Mayer) |
This year’s snowy winter makes New England’s iconic stone walls look even more picturesque. The sturdy markers dot our local landscape, a backdrop to yards, property lines, photos and views. But what else do they do?
| Photo by Will Collette |
“Growing up, stone walls were all around me,” says Rinehart,
a new assistant professor of watershed ecology at URI, who grew up in rural
Connecticut. Rinehart runs URI’s Watershed
Bio(diversity)-Funk(tion)
Lab, which studies how plant and animal biodiversity can support local
efforts to conserve, manage, and restore important ecosystems, like salt
marshes.
New postdoctoral researcher Jamie Bucholz is working with him on this new project, looking to understand the ecosystem of stone walls. Bucholz will use what she learns about stone walls to better understand the genetic biodiversity of the species that call them home.
New to New England, she is beginning her work by examining stone walls found across the region by utilizing RIGIS environmental data provided by URI’s Jason Parent and Elliot Vosburgh ’18 ’24. The pair created a rich data set, the Rhode Island Stone Wall Mapping Project, showing where all of Rhode Island’s stone walls exist.
Foulkes blasts McKee over Rhode Island bridge safety
From “cooking the books” to threats from Alviti
Campaign Blasts McKee Administration for Removing Bridges
from Safety Reporting
Providence, RI — In response to WPRI reporting that the McKee administration cooked the books by removing more than 700 state bridges from the list to try to claim it met its safety and inspection goals, Helena Buonanno Foulkes issued the following statement:
“The McKee Administration has a pattern of putting politics
over competence, and this is just the latest example,” said Helena. “You
can’t cook the books and then gaslight the people of Rhode Island; Governor
McKee has failed Rhode Islanders, and his dishonesty only makes it worse.
Foulkes Campaign Not Worried About “Hearing Forcefully”
From Resigned McKee Admin Transportation Director
Providence, RI — Yesterday, after
announcing his resignation and cooking the books to make it look like he met RIDOT’s
bridge safety goal, RIDOT Director Peter Alviti posted a bizarre “open letter”
on the taxpayer-funded RIDOT website. After claiming over and over again that he wasn’t fired, he ended the
letter stating: “And if anyone lies or misrepresents the facts for personal
gain, they will be hearing forcefully from me."
In reply, Foulkes campaign communications director Angelika
Pellegrino released the following statement:
“Empty threats aside, Mr. Alviti should know there is no
need to misrepresent any facts to point out that Dan McKee caused months of
delay when he bungled the bid process to repair the Washington Bridge, that
Director Alviti couldn’t remember the name of the safety inspector in his own
agency when under oath last fall, and that Rhode Islanders have to sit in
traffic daily—and will have to do so for years to come—because of the McKee
Administration’s failures. ”
Most COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy linked to concerns that can be overcome, study suggests
Vaccines work, are safe and can save your life
Why not protect yourself against preventable disease?
By Lancet
Edited by Sadie Harley, reviewed by Robert Egan

The study, led by researchers from Imperial College London,
found that of the participants initially hesitant about getting a COVID-19
vaccine, 65% went on to get vaccinated at least once.
The findings offer a novel perspective on the main types of
vaccine hesitancy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Their potential to be reversed
may help inform the targeting and messaging for future roll-outs of novel
vaccines.
While vaccine hesitancy is not a new phenomenon, with WHO naming
vaccine hesitancy as one of the top 10 global health threats in 2019, reduced
uptake of various vaccines, including childhood vaccinations against measles
and pertussis (whooping cough), remains a major public health concern.
COVID-19 vaccination roll-out began in the UK on 8th
December 2020, with a phased strategy that prioritized vaccines on the basis of
age and clinical need.
"We wanted to look at COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in
more depth to identify groups with more persistent forms of hesitancy and their
main concerns. Understanding these drivers is critical to address vaccine
uptake and better control disease spread," explained lead author Professor
Marc Chadeau-Hyam from Imperial College London, UK.
Thursday, February 5, 2026
Civilians Should Not Have to ‘Stand between the Powers of this World and the Most Vulnerable’
Trump says law doesn't apply to him - “My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me.”
Dr. Bandy X. Lee
It was the irony of ironies when the most critical voices of conscience of our time—mental health experts warning against a mental health pandemic—were silenced in the name of “ethics”.
This is what happened to us at the height of our influence, when we were consulted by over fifty U.S. Congress members, who told us they were depending on us to “educate the public medically,” so that they could “intervene politically.”
Even White
House Chief of Staff General John Kelly turned out to have used our book as an
“owner’s manual”—applying its principles, when nothing else worked, to stop
an erratic president from waging nuclear war on North Korea!
The tremendous momentum was artificially halted when American Psychiatric Association (APA) aggressively intervened, citing its own guild rule that exclusively protects public figures—which no other mental health association or licensing board duplicates—as being more important than the public’s health, the nation’s security, or the species’ survival.
It was
nonsensical, but the public swallowed it, since it was coming from an
authoritative organization. But it was later revealed that the APA distorted its
own “rule” and embarked on a disinformation campaign, so as to protect its
federal funding—and, for
Jeffrey Lieberman who spearheaded it, his personal federal funds (and fame).
We warned in real time that such cowardice would be
calamitous, permitting mental impairments in an influential figure to magnify
and transmogrify, until they would become unstoppable.
Columnist
David Brooks wrote recently:
Last week Minneapolis’s police chief, Brian O’Hara, said the thing he fears most is the “moment where it all explodes.” I share his worry…. it’s pretty clear that we’re headed toward some kind of crackup…. the unraveling of Trump’s mind is the primary one.












