Menu Bar

Home           Calendar           Topics          Just Charlestown          About Us

Thursday, March 19, 2026

What Rhode Islanders should expect as economic consequences of Trump's Iran war

Cost of Iranian conflict likely to extend beyond energy prices, says URI economy professor

James Bessette

In the dead of night on Feb. 28, United States and Israeli forces conducted a massive surprise attack on Iran, resulting in several top Iranian leaders being killed, including the country’s supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei. 

The attacks, which were celebrated by many Iranians around the world in ending an oppressive regime, sparked significant conflict where ongoing missile strikes are occurring in the Middle East. Economically, energy costs—particularly oil and gas—have spiked in the U.S. and abroad. More recently, vessels traveling the Strait of Hormuz—a critical global shipping route—have struck mines reportedly planted by Iran, further affecting commercial activity.

Nina Eichacker, associate economics professor at the University of Rhode Island, says everyone will feel the effects of the ongoing conflict in the Middle East the longer it lasts. And, it’s not just at the pump where society will be hit hard, she says. Instability and civil unrest in the region also has a cost.

What would you say is the greatest concern involving the conflict in Iran and rising energy costs associated with it?

Along with the risks that current conflict creates for anyone in our community who lives or works (or who has family or friends living or working) in the Middle East, I am thinking a lot about the effects of the current crisis on energy prices. As we’ve seen, this conflict has been followed by a dramatic increase in oil prices for a few reasons. 

First, combatting nations are targeting oil producing facilities, which both constrains supply and increases the time required for eventually returning to producing the volume of oil necessary for what fossil fuel users around the world expect to acquire. Second, Iran’s decision to close the Strait of Hormuz—by attacking ships, and threatening to place mines in that body of water—where one-fifth of the world’s oil and natural gas is shipped, considerably restricts global supply of these widely used fuels. 

Oil prices have risen from approximately $73 per barrel before the Feb. 28 attacks to as high as $120 a barrel. Those prices remain volatile, but some analysts predict that if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, oil prices could rise to $200 a barrel. Gas and jet fuel prices have risen in short order, fertilizer prices are rising, and many other products that require oil (plastics), as well as the cost of distributing goods, will go up.  

If refineries are closed, the cost of returning to activity is considerable. Refining oil around the world will become more expensive the longer crude oil access is limited, which will eventually affect prices of a wide range of goods and services. 

Who do you feel will be impacted the most with these rising costs? 

Anyone who pays to fill up their gas tank and who heats their homes with oil will likewise be affected. These costs are going to affect people across the entire income spectrum. However, the increases will be particularly hard for low-income and fixed-income households, since these households spend a larger share of their income on fuel.

Beyond just increased oil and gas prices, how else will the Iranian conflict impact society?

Civil unrest is costly. Instability in the region hurts Americans who live and work in the Middle East, and it hurts anyone in our region with family or friends there. It also affects the productive potential of affected countries. The destruction of infrastructure delays these countries from rebounding and producing goods and services that trade partners rely on. 

It curtails production of other goods and services in the region, including pharmaceuticals, iron ore, and agricultural products such as nuts. While the United States has trade sanctions in place with Iran, Iran trades a lot with countries such as China, Turkey, and India—all countries that the U.S. does a considerable amount of trade with. All of these changes are likely to lead to higher costs, output shortages, and more dire consequences as the military conflict persists.

Do you feel these rising energy costs could extend into the summer months? If so, how?

It all depends on how easily the combating nations come to agreements after the fact. I think there’s a credible risk of this conflict lasting. Even if the conflict is resolved, it will hamper existing refiners returning to operation the longer the Strait of Hormuz is closed, extending the lag for consumers around the world. I remember oil prices in 2007 and 2008 when I was a new college graduate; I could certainly see prices lingering between $4 and $5 per gallon, or more, as demand peaks in the summertime.

Where do you see this conflict heading and how might that impact the United States economically?

It will get worse for the average American if this conflict continues. While the U.S. is the largest global exporter of oil and natural gas, the time required to increase the scale of domestic production is considerable, and there’s no guarantee that those stocks would be marketed to U.S. residents. 

Congress could authorize the release and sale of strategic petroleum reserves—as the Biden administration did in 2022.

Are there any steps people can take to help mitigate the impact of rising energy prices?

People should start saving more in an attempt to prioritize budgets. In the medium term, thinking about reliance on smaller vehicles, carpooling or electrifying more could all help. This is especially difficult right now given the Trump administration’s measures that have added tariffs to imports that could facilitate these changes.