Did Gentz do ANY due diligence at all on the Y-Gate deal?
By Will Collette
In Part One of this two-part analysis of an extraordinary letter to the Westerly Sun penned by Charlestown Town Council Boss Tom Gentz, I showed
you how Gentz’s view of what happened during Charlestown’s Y-Gate Scandal had almost no basis in fact.
In his Sun letter, Gentz claimed there was no deception, no false
representations, no withheld information, no secret meetings and no backroom
deals. In Gentz’s fantasy, there were only diligent and selfless volunteers
trying to do a nice thing for the town by lining up a deal for Charlestown
taxpayers to pay $475,000 for limited rights to walk around in a rural
junkyard.
The records show that Gentz is either deluded or deceptive. You be the
judge, today and on November 6, since Gentz seems determined to run for
re-election as the champion of Y-Gate.
In this installment, we’ll look at Gentz’s basic failure to
exercise the kind of prudent judgment and minimum standard of care we have the
right to expect from a person in his position.
Did Gentz fail to notice the many signs that Y-Gate was a rotten
deal? Did he even read any of the documents placed before him? Did he ask the
right questions? Did he simply do what Planning Commissar Ruth Platner told him
to do? Did he even write the Westerly Sun letter, or did Ruth write it for him? Or was Gentz part of the Y-Gate scam from the beginning?