Menu Bar

Home           Calendar           Topics          Just Charlestown          About Us

Sunday, January 15, 2012

Rhode Island Political Bits

Larisa fights back…Wind turbine opponent is leading carbon polluter…One RI urban myth debunked…Costa goes to the woodshed…Another RI urban myth rebunked
By Will Collette

Injun Joe fights ethics fines. As I recently reported, Charlestown’s Special Counsel for Indian Affairs “Injun Joe” Larisa, the ethically challenged former East Providence Mayor, was named by GoLocalProv.com  as the recipient of the highest fines in 2011 for ethics violations. Now, EastBayRI.com reports Larisa has attempted to turn the tables on the RI Ethics Commission by filing a complaint against the Commission! The Commission fined Larisa for violating state law against “revolving door” employment, an issue that may also figure in Council member Lisa DiBello’s legal actions against the town. Charlestown has paid Larisa $169,259 since July 2009 for his work in fighting the Narragansett Indian Tribe.

Lots more....



Wind Turbine opponent named one of Rhode Island’s Top Ten greenhouse gas emitters. EPA has just developed a new database that allows you to look up the carbon emissions of local sources, public and private. In Rhode Island, most of the top ten offenders are power plants  – all of them fired with fossil fuels. But coming at #6 with 56,000 metric tons of carbon emissions is North Kingstown’s Toray Plastics. Toray Plastics is the leader co-plaintiff with plastics maker Polytop Corp. in the federal lawsuit seeking to block the construction of the Deepwater Wind turbine farm that will be sited near Block Island. This does make some political sense: the financier of bogus “grassroots” opposition to the Cape Wind project are petrochemical moguls, the Koch Brothers

Rhode Island’s Top Twenty Campaign Contributors. Over the past ten years, according to GoLocalProv.com, the top twenty campaign contributors gave almost $10 million to candidates. But contrary to the urban myth spread by talk radio and right-wing pundits, not one of those top 20 are unions. In the #1 spot is Textron at almost $3 million, followed by the Royal Bank of Scotland (owner of Citizens Bank) at just under $1 million. This is more hard evidence of the right-wing juggernaut that has taken control of politics in Rhode Island

SC Independent takes Doreen Costa to the woodshed.  In an editorial with uncharacteristically sharp language, the South County Independent has castigated Tea Party state Representative Doreen Costa (R-NO Kingstown) for trying to line up state support to keep the deficit-plagued, though popular, Waterfire displays going in Providence. The editorial notes that Costa’s sometimes wacky publicity-grabbing stunts, as well as her persistent efforts to attack welfare benefits for the poor and state benefit programs, stand in contrast with trying to win state subsidies for a Providence tourist attraction. The newspaper also asks what this has to do with the needs within Costa’s own district, which has sites, like the Gilbert Stuart Birthplace and Smith’s Castle, that could use some state aid. Or economic development to keep small businesses alive in Wickford, or fill empty commercial space along Route One. As the Independent put it, “there’s plenty in South County to take up her attention.

Pension funding goals – an ”urban legend?” WPRI’s Ted Nesi notes that state policy makers have taken it as a sacred tenet that for a public pension to be considered “healthy,” it must be funded at an 80% level. Nesi points out that the ProJo’s ace economics reporters and Nesi himself have cited the 80% figure repeatedly as an unshakeable fact. General Treasurer Gina Raimondo (DINO) has cited 80% funding as the point where, maybe, state pensioners might get their cost of living adjustments (COLA) back. 

But apparently, this supposed standard really isn’t real. Nesi cites Governing magazine’s Girard Miller, a veteran pension analyst and a former fellow of the National Academy of Public Administration: Miller says that there is no original source for the 80% figure – that even respected sources like the Pew Research Center and GAO simply cite the figure, but don’t provide back-up sources, essentially deeming the 80% as part of the common wisdom. Which, according to Miller, it isn’t. 

Nesi reports that Rhode Island’s pension system was 48% funded before the new law passed; the state’s actuaries project it will reach 80% funded around 2031 and 100% by 2036.”

3 comments:

  1. Beth Richardson comments
    There are a lot of facts being tossed around here in this article. As I understand it Toray Plastics is against the Deepwater Wind Project because electricity costs are one of its prime production costs. If the cost of electricity for Toray Plastics goes up significantly, as it is projected to do if Deepwater Wind goes online, Toray's very existence could be jeopardized. This is about as legitimate an objection as a business can make. If Toray goes under, all the unionizing activities possible will not save the jobs of the people working there. Throwing in the Koch brother's names is a cheap shot. Wind power may well be the way of the future, but it will have to get there by proving itself affordable. The world might be a better place if we all drove Priuses (Prii ?) but we don't all want to make the kind of sacrifices it would take to afford them. And we don't want to make the kind of sacrifices it would take to do without plastics or do with significantly less electricity, both as you say major carbon emitters. It is a jockeying of cost and technological progress; it is not a right-wing conspiracy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Beth - Last April 28 I wrote a piece on energy subsidies ( http://progressive-charlestown.blogspot.com/2011/04/how-energy-subsidies-really-work.html) that laid out & sourced how ALL of our energy production is subsidized. For more than 50 years, nuclear power has NEVER been able to operate without $1 billion a year in federal support. We currently subsidize fossil fuels at more than 3 to 1 over alternative energy. NONE of our energy sources pay for themselves. NONE of them are "affordable" on their own.

    It is unfair to expect wind power or any other alternative energy to win in a cost comparison with conventional fuels with that lopsided subsidy ratio in place. The other factor often omitted from the cost analysis is that for most alternative energy (wind, solar, geothermal, etc.), the major cost is all at the front end - i.e. building it. Once built, the costs plummet. With a coal, oil or gas-fired power plant, you can build it cheaply, but then you have to feed it with fuel whose cost is sky-rocketing and likely to continue to do so.

    The only difference between Toray's motive for fighting wind power and that of the Koch Brothers' is scale. Both like things the way they are. So I think it's fair to look at Toray as a micro-Koch.

    But on your point that conservation is really the most important thing we as a nation should do, I agree 100%. I almost threw a party when the Hummer went out of production. I am with you completely on the need to use less power and less plastic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Beth Richardson comments
      I am not in favor of energy subsidies for power sources of any kind. The nature of subsidies is that they go to the politically well-connected and skew the markets. You make a good point that all the power sources have been heavily subsidized. What would happen if the government stopped all this subsidizing? I bet there would be a flurry of innovation in power sources on the market. We get stymied in our thinking, imagining that the only way something can work is with the government subsidizing and holding down parameters with regulation. Look what happened to the phone industry when the government stopped allowing Ma Bell to be the only option. Who would have imagined cell phones and wireless technology?

      It does not seem to me that Toray is dedicated to keeping things "the way they are", so much as keeping its power costs from going up.

      Hummer was doomed to die a natural death. It was a silly idea in the first place.

      Delete

Comments are moderated so your comment will not appear immediately.