By Will Collette
On Wednesday, at 6 PM, the Town Council will hold a special
meeting/workshop to discuss the two bids the town received to install a red
light enforcement camera system at the town’s four stop lights along Route 1.
The good news is the two bidders understand that Charlestown wants a “turn-key” operation that will not cost Charlestown taxpayers a nickel for the
system, so their proposals include a “cost neutrality guarantee.” For the term
of the contract, Redflex and Sensys are prepared to accept whatever revenue the
ticket fines generate.
But the actual cost of the system will make you gasp, and
also make you wonder how it will be possible for this system to pay for itself.
First, a disclaimer. I am a huge fan of red-light cameras, although I have no financial stake in them. Having lived and worked in the Washington DC
metro area for 25 years, I am convinced these cameras probably saved Cathy and me from death
or serious injury. Red-light running is a regional sport in DC, sort of like
the way Rhode Island drivers love to tailgate in the high-speed lane on the
highway.
I do believe red-light cameras have a significant deterrent
effect on red-light running and save lives.
I had also hoped they could generate some cash for the town,
too, but after looking at the bids, that seems very unlikely unless our lives
on Charlestown ’s
main artery changes in a pretty drastic way.
You can read the town’s bid specs and the two proposals by
clicking here.
While both bidders offer different pricing options and
packages, the proposals are very similar in structure.
We will need 16 camera systems – one system to cover each of
the four compass points at the four town stop lights. Each system will cost
just under $5000 a month, give or take, depending on the options the town might select.
So 16 camera systems x $5000 x 12 months = $960,000.
Let’s say the tickets are $75 each and around 80% of the tickets get
paid. To break even, the vendors’s systems would have to issue roughly 15,000
red-lighting running notices of violation.
15,000 tickets. 1250 a month.
In all of 2011, the Charlestown Police Department issued 756
citations for all offenses, not just
red-light running. That’s an average of 63 citations per month. So far in 2012,
we’re running at an average of 76 tickets a month.
But 1250! An average of 42 per day. More or less. That's a very big change in the intensity of current traffic enforcement which averages between two and three tickets a day.
I wish my Progressive Charlestown colleague Tom Ferrio wasn’t
on vacation – he’s our team’s math guy – but even with my suspect math, the
nature of driving down Route 1 would need to change very drastically for the vendors to make money, never mind
generate any revenue for Charlestown.
I really don’t have a problem with the vendors getting
hosed, but I doubt if they’re totally stupid. Both of them are leading
national vendors for these systems and know how to turn a profit from their products.
One of the first things these vendors would do first is
conduct a study and analysis of our intersections to measure traffic flow and determine what would be needed to properly cover those locations. Obviously, the
corporate bean-counters will run the numbers to make sure they work for their interests as well as ours.
At our end, if we have a vendor willing to give us a million-dollar
traffic safety system that will deter dangerous conduct for free and at no risk, hey, what’s not to
like?
![]() |
| "Why'd y'all run that there stop light?" |
But 1250 tickets a month might be the answer to that question.
If the systems are set up to nail that volume of Route 1 users, that could be
as bad for Charlestown ’s
reputation - as some stereotypical Southern speed trap town.
Perhaps all will become clear on Wednesday night. I know our
soon-to-be-retired Chief Jack
Shippee put a lot of work into moving this concept along. I also remember how
he was almost embarrassed when he told the Council about the numbers in the two
bids.
Clearly, the point of the red-light cameras is to deter
red-light running by issuing more citations than our human police officers can. After all,
the camera system is a machine, a traffic robo-cop – you can’t reason with it, and it’s out there
24/7, guarding each intersection, which is something that human police officers
can’t do.
So let’s keep an open mind and stay focused on the value of
protecting lives. But I hope to hell the reality doesn’t match the math.



If 1250 red-light infractions were in fact being committed in Charlestown every month, the intersections of Rt. 1 would be like the Dodge 'em cars at Rocky Point.
ReplyDeleteMaybe the reason RI drivers love to tailgate in the high-speed lane is because so many drivers do not realize that the left lane is the passing lane....
ReplyDeleteAs far as red-light cameras, if they are cost neutral to the town, why would anyone be against them...unless of course they violate the red lights....if 1250 lights are run each month, then issue the tickets. I only wish they also gave people tickets for illegal u-turns as well...
Resident
That's exactly why I'm opposed to the red-light cameras; of all the illegal, dangerous, and downright obnoxious things that people do behind the wheel, red-light cameras single out only one of them.
DeleteSo do not punish an individual crime unless you can punish all crime? That makes about as much sense as a football bat.
DeleteAll due respect to Chief Shippee, but red light cameras are not about punishing crime but generating revenue, and municipalities all across the country have been removing the cameras when they don't end up ginning up the anticipated revenue. Back in 1986, when RI was adopting mandatory recycling, DPW director Alan Arsenault tried to argue that Charlestown should be allowed to "opt out" because vacationers won't obey the rules. I think the same will apply to the cameras.
Delete