Menu Bar

Home           Calendar           Topics          Just Charlestown          About Us
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Sunday, September 17, 2017

Common Cause challenges Ken Block’s qualifications as well as his findings of RI voter fraud

By Steve Rackett in Rhode Island’s Future

Image result for blockheadKen Block’s evidence to Donald Trump’s Election Commission Integrity meeting in New Hampshire was rebuked on Twitter by elections expert John Marion, the executive director of Common Cause RI.

In a series of tweets, John Marion said, “I want to share a few thoughts. Social scientists have done rigorous research on the question of matching voter lists. Suggestions that no one has taken serious look are false.”

Marion, who tweeted at least 12 times on the topic, concluded about Block’s report, “You can’t take this report at face value. Be skeptical, and read the experts.” “Unlike Block’s report,” Marion tweeted, others “dug deeper into how elections are administered & find admin errors likely yield false positives.”


For example, Harvard researcher Michael Morse worked with Shared Goel of Stanford and others to author “One Person, One Vote: Estimating the Prevalence of Double Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections” and concludes that the Crosscheck program, advocated by Block “would eliminate about 200 registrations used to cast legitimate votes for every one registration used to cast a double vote.”

Elections Specialist Michael McDonald, an Associate Professor at the University of Florida says of Ken Block that it is “Extremely troubling person with no election admin experience asked to testify before vote fraud commission.” 

McDonald went on  to say that “election officials verify addresses before accepting voter registration Block could have talked to them to understand, but wild claims plays better”. 

He also disputed Block’s claim that any address with a PO Box is improper. “(he) Doesn’t know that RV folks and homeless may use non-residential addresses”.

“Matching millions of names and birth dates across databases results in many false positive matches, in this case claims of double voting. Block recognizes this problem, and winnows ~60,000 naive matches to 7,271 by adding social security numbers to the match criteria. States do not publicly release SSN, so Block contracted a fraud detection company to append SSN5 to his list of 60,000 suspect double voters. Even if 7,271 alleged double votes are recorded in the databases, Block does not consider the possibility of administrative error”.

McDonald is the co-author of earlier research which also undermines one of Ken Block’s key claims of voter fraud, where voters share both names and birthdays. In “Seeing Double Voting: An Extension of the Birthday Problem” published in 2008 . He says “We show that these allegations are inflated.”

Meanwhile, another election expert, Professor Paul Gronke of Reed College and Director, Early Voting Information Center is heavily critical of the full Government Accountability Institute (GAI) report, which Ken Block has contributed. 

”Even a cursory reading reveals a number of serious misunderstandings and confusions that call into question that authors’ understanding of some of the most basic facts about voter registration, voting, and elections administration in the United States.” Professor Gronke has also called the GAI report “sloppy and misinformed”

Steve Rackett held elected office as a Green Party representative on a district council in Watford, England (just north of London). He won 3 terms in office as well as winning a term on Hertfordshire County Council. He chaired various council committees and eventually became the first Green Party member to become Chairman of the council. He has worked for various non-profits throughout his career and has a strong interest in politics in Rhode Island. twitter.com/Spring_is_ours and www.facebook.com/steve.rackett.writes