Analyzing the Whalerock decision
Last
August, RI Superior
Court Judge Judith Savage dismissed all the Whalerock cases and berated all
four major parties and their lawyers for terrible legal work[1].
She sent the Whalerock industrial wind farm dispute back to the Charlestown
Zoning Board of Review (ZBR) because their decision did not include
documentation of any points of law to support their votes.
The
ZBR reconsidered Whalerock’s appeal of the town’s reversal on their permit
approval, added documentation drafted by the Zoning Board’s lawyer, and again
decided that Whalerock met the requirements of the law with the same 4-1 vote as the previous decision upholding Whalerock’s appeal.
This
confirmation of the previous decision by the ZBR led swiftly to a new legal
challenge by the town of Charlestown to sue its own Zoning Board. Whalerock
counter-sued. Trailing behind, a smaller group of neighbors weighed in with
their own lawsuit. That put all four major parties who were tossed out of court
last August back in Superior Court, but before a different judge.
Judge Rodgers was picked by former Governor Don Carcieri who swore her in in 2009 |
The Planning Commission also may have taken a hit when Judge Rodgers definitively stated that in this case, the Commission’s role is purely advisory, even though Planning has become Charlestown’s de facto ruling regulatory and legislative body.
A
careful reading of Judge Rodgers
decision
shows that neither the Town of Charlestown, represented by Town Solicitor Peter
Ruggiero nor the Areglado plaintiffs represented by James Donnelly were able to
mount challenges that were any better than those rejected by Judge Savage last
August.