Menu Bar

Home           Calendar           Topics          Just Charlestown          About Us
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Thursday, June 14, 2012

Dim bulbs, continued

Congress Revives Zombie Light Bulbs as Energy Dept. Funds New Tech from: Tina Casey, Triple Pundit, 

The House of Representatives and the Department of Energy played out their own version of the zombie apocalypse last week, as the House voted to reanimate the all-but-dead incandescent light bulb and the Energy Department countered with the announcement of $7 million more in funding to develop new, more energy efficient lighting technologies.

Fittingly, The House vote took place at night on June 5. By voice vote, members approved an amendment to the 2012 Energy and Water spending bill that would prevent DOE from enforcing the phase-in of new energy efficiency standards for light bulbs” but that could turn out to be a classic case of locking the barn door after the horses are gone.

Phasing out inefficient light bulbs
Though the new standards are required by a 2007 law enacted under President Bush, the so-called light bulb "ban" has become a favorite target of conservative legislators and pundits during President Obama’s term in office.

The law is actually not a direct ban on any particular technology, but in effect it phases out the low-cost, but notoriously inefficient conventional incandescent bulb. That technology, which is based on heating a filament, has not changed substantially in more than 100 years.
Article continues at ENN affiliate, Triple Pundit


  1. Progressive politics and light bulbs:

    All light bulbs have advantages, for different use in different locations.
    Incandescents aren't bad just for being "old" - as seen from their popularity.

    Even if certain light bulbs – or Cars, Buildings, Washing Machines etc – had
    to be targeted to save energy, market competition or taxation policies are more relevant.

    (taxation can pay for price lowering subsidies on alternatives as well as giving Govmt income
    so people "not just hit by taxes")

    Both alternative policies don’t just keep choice, but are in addition better at promoting innovation and saving more energy overall,
    as referenced

  2. Beth Richardson comments
    Amen to that, Peter T!


Comments are moderated so your comment will not appear immediately.