Menu Bar

Home           Calendar           Topics          Just Charlestown          About Us

Thursday, April 2, 2026

Son of long-time Charlestown Assistant Solicitor Bob Craven declares candidacy to replace his father

Robert Craven Jr. is running for House District 32

Steve Ahlquist

When Robert Craven Jr. announced he was running for the State Representative seat his father was vacating, I reached out to request an interview. We met at Cafe Nero in Downtown Providence, a place so busy neither of us had coffee. The interview has been edited for clarity:

Steve Ahlquist: I don’t want to start on a negative note, but in this state, we oftentimes have what I think of as “inherited” seats. That is, the child of a politician taking over an elected position from their parent. Your father is the current State Representative from District 32, so what do you bring to this position that makes it earned rather than inherited?

Robert Craven: Two things. One, I’m running not because I have his name; I’m running despite having his name. I’m running in North Kingstown because it’s where I grew up and where I know the state and the country best. I’m running because I have the specific experience to deliver meaningful results for North Kingstown. My father represented well. He had his own experience to rely on. I have some of the same skills, but a different skill set and perspective on much of it, which will let me either expand on or add to what he accomplished.

Steve Ahlquist: You do have an impressive resume. Do you want to talk about that?

Robert Craven: I’m glad to. For the past three years, I’ve been the policy director for Rhode Island’s Treasurer. In that capacity, I’ve helped champion legislation that expanded wealth opportunities for low-income Rhode Islanders, helped towns like North Kingstown protect themselves from the threats of climate change, helped survivors of sexual assault access the funds and support systems they need, and pushed Rhode Island forward in financial well-being. Before that, I ran the Treasurer’s campaign, as you know...

Steve Ahlquist: Which is when I got to know you a little bit.

Robert Craven: Exactly. And before I got into the politics and policy side of things, I practiced law for a few years at a litigation firm in Downtown Providence, where I practiced banking law, complex commercial disputes, and class action lawsuits.

Steve Ahlquist: That put you in the position to be in the Treasurer’s office

Robert Craven: Yeah. It was a good foundation for understanding the issues the office usually deals with. And I dealt with a lot of land use and Coastal Resources Management Council (CRMC) law when I was practicing law, which gave me the CRMC’s perspective on things and where some of these communities and their zoning boards are in terms of being able to construct (or not construct) what they’re comfortable with, and what’s environmentally sound.

Steve Ahlquist: Land use and the CRMC are two hot topics at the State House right now. We’re dealing with land use issues and possibly reorganizing the CRMC or folding it into the Department of Environmental Management (DEM).

Robert Craven: I think CRMC needs a revisit. That organization has served the state well enough since its creation, but the policies surrounding it are changing. The needs of the state have shifted, and there’s going to be a lot more urgency in what they do as we head towards an era where we might see a dramatic change in what’s happening on our shoreline.

Steve Ahlquist: I think we’re already seeing dramatic changes. We’re looking at parts of Newport going underwater...

Robert Craven: ... and Warren, North Kingstown, Westerly...

Steve Ahlquist: Yeah. Whole sections of the state - land, houses, businesses, whatever - are going to be flooded if we can’t figure out something.

Growing up in a political household, what was that like? Mine is a firefighter family, so we were somewhat political, union politics...

Robert Craven: My mom was a union president in Narragansett. I grew up hearing about the Department of Education and how it was not funding teachers. When I was in middle school, I remember hearing about pension reform from my mom, who was one of the people affected by it. Growing up in that kind of household with a father always interested in policy and politics shows you that the system is accessible, right? I went to George Washington University down in DC, but I came back to intern in health and housing policy for Governor Lincoln Chafee.

That experience, along with what I had growing up, showed me how accessible the system can be. And then, if you learn how the system works, you can really accomplish something through it. There’s this impression that politicians are inaccessible or that they’re in it for malicious intent, but that’s not the case. You have a lot of good people out there who are trying to accomplish something - trying to do the right thing. That’s kind of the lesson that I learned growing up around it.

Steve Ahlquist: I think that’s true. We have a very accessible government here. It’s like a half-mile walk between Providence City Hall and the Rhode Island State House. You can meet all your politicians in both places.

Robert Craven: I’ve gone to some conferences for the Treasurer’s office, and when I talk to people from other states, they’re surprised to learn how often the public is engaged in these conversations at our State House and how often all of our state leaders are in one place. That’s unique to Rhode Island, and that means there’s more communication. People get to build relationships with elected leaders and learn where their minds are on stuff.

Steve Ahlquist: I think about that. In a city like New York, if you want to deal with state politics, you’ve got to drive an hour or so north to Albany. In California, it’s even more ridiculous.

Robert Craven: You have to jump on a plane.

Steve Ahlquist: Exactly. You can’t just drive.

Robert Craven: We see everybody in our House and Senate all the time.

Steve Ahlquist: I love the compactness and the accessibility of Rhode Island.

We talked a little bit about climate and housing. What other issues are motivating you?

Robert Craven: The most pressing issue facing not just North Kingstown but also the state is that incomes haven’t risen enough to keep pace with the economy. Right now, incomes aren’t at a place where you can buy your way into the middle class.

Steve Ahlquist: Not even close.

Robert Craven: That affects housing. The promise of home ownership has always been part of the American dream, and this generation of Americans faces the reality that they might not be able to achieve it. They might not be able to afford their kids’ education because of the high cost.

There are many facets to this, but the core of the problem is financial well-being and income.

Steve Ahlquist: How do we solve for that?

Robert Craven: There’s no one solution. It’s taking steps towards progress in housing. We have to focus on building lower-, middle-income, and working-class housing. People often associate the term “low-income housing” with a particular person. They conjure up a particular idea, but really, our teachers, firefighters, and first responders are being pushed out of the opportunity to own a home. A raised ranch in North Kingstown is like $750,000, and within my lifetime, that was once a $300,000 house. The solution is to increase housing stock at both levels and be intentional about how we’re helping people cut costs.

In terms of healthcare, that’s a real burden on people right now. People worry about how they’ll afford healthcare. It means being intentional about how people are saving for retirement, and it comes in the form of income growth, too, expanding opportunity...

Steve Ahlquist: I have to say that when it comes to investing in or planning for retirement, I don’t know many young people who are doing either. They are living hand to mouth, paycheck to paycheck. I’ve got three kids. One owns a home, the other two are still paying down their student debt.

Robert Craven: That’s exactly what you’re seeing right now, where 40, 50 years ago, you had people who had the financial ability to plan for the future. But right now, you have people graduating from college with insurmountable debt, trying to figure out how to pay rent and looking at the prices of groceries or gas to get to work. The costs of today are so present that they can’t think about tomorrow. They have to think day by day. That’s the unfortunate reality we’re in and something we have to look at; otherwise, 50 years down the road, we’re going to have a lot of people looking to retire who either find they can’t, have to work into old age, or not be able to afford day-to-day expenses.

Steve Ahlquist: We’re seeing the second part of that already: People unable to afford rent, people working well into retirement or more. My dad bought his first house in Warwick as a firefighter for around $20k. Itwas possible to do then.

Robert Craven: When my grandfather was a Providence firefighter, his wife didn’t work while they raised their seven kids. Seven kids supported on a firefighter’s salary. That is simply impossible today.

Steve Ahlquist: Today, both parents need to be working.

Robert Craven: And there’s this idea that you can work your way through college, pull yourself up by the bootstraps, but outside of opportunities that the state has created for CCRI and for Rhode Island College, it’s nearly impossible to work your way through a four-year institution.

Steve Ahlquist: I may be from the last generation of people who were able to go to school basically on Pell Grants.

Robert Craven: And Pell Grants are shrinking. They’re under attack.

Steve Ahlquist: I know. I have older cousins who worked in ice cream stores during the summer to pay for their college education.

Can I ask how old you are, by the way?

Robert Craven: 31…

Steve Ahlquist: I thought so, because of the Chaffee internship...

Robert Craven: I interned for Democrat Chaffee.

Steve Ahlquist: We’ve talked about the cost of living, health care, housing...

Robert Craven: We talked about the environment a little bit. North Kingstown is one of those communities that will be particularly affected as climate change intensifies. We’re a waterfront community. Climate change means the erosion of our coastline and beaches. We also have in Quonsett and in the fishing industry. A lot of people and businesses depend on the blue economy, right? So, as the water warms and fishermen have to go further out, or they’re simply not finding the same shellfish or fish that were once there, you’re going to see big economic impacts on people.

Quonsett is a major employer in our state. 6% of the state’s jobs are in Quonsett, and this past week, that increased by another 8,000 jobs. But we’re going to see those industries start to shift in how they address some of this. Even for communities and parts of the town that aren’t along that waterfront, you’re going to see impacts, like an increase in the cost of insurance, and that’s money out of people’s pockets.

Steve Ahlquist: And home insurance is mandatory - unavoidable if you want to keep your house, you have to keep your insurance.

Robert Craven: We just saw a particularly harsh winter, and that’s symptomatic of global climate change. The cost of cleanup was in the hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars in many of these communities. That comes from the taxpayer budget, right? It means fewer resources you can allocate to education and infrastructure, and fewer people you can support through other programs. So people who don’t think they’re affected because they don’t have waterfront property aren’t seeing the whole picture.

Steve Ahlquist: None of these problems stops at the border of any particular municipality, right? We are all in this together, whether we see it or not. For instance, every person experiencing homelessness is a cost to all of us that could be mitigated...

Robert Craven: And there’s a social cost as well. We don’t want people to lack access to homes. We want to expand shelters and spaces, but also boost people up rather than just say, “Here’s a spot to go.”

Steve Ahlquist: There’s also a moral cost, too. It hardens our hearts when you see homelessness every day, and you start to think, “This is the world,” and you just let it happen.

Robert Craven: It becomes expected versus something that should trigger a response.

Steve AhlquistElectric Boat is hiring a giant number of people...

Robert Craven: They are, and those are great working-class jobs for the state. Electric Boat has brought in a lot of opportunities for people, and that’s a real asset to the state.

Steve Ahlquist: The downside, to my mind, though, is that it’s the military economy. Imagine if we had 30,000 people building more housing? It seems there are better ways to generate those jobs than by adding more submarines.

Robert Craven: The cash injection through the housing bond that passed two years ago and the one that is proposed in the budget now, which I expect to pass and be on the ballot in November, both of those will provide more opportunity for job creation and growth, not just in the construction industry and the trades. That’s a good start. $120 million is a decent-sized bond, but we still need more.

And it’s going to take years. There’s been a lot of frustration with the pace of this. We didn’t pay attention to housing for so long...

Steve Ahlquist: It’s like our bridges. We ignored our bridges, and then suddenly there’s a price.

Robert Craven: And now we’re seeing it. And a little more preparedness on the state side could help us mitigate these problems before they become crises. And healthcare is the worst one.

Steve Ahlquist: Part of that is that our General Assembly, because it is limited in funds, is always borrowing from the future. By not investing in housing now, I can spend the money on other things, but at some point, that bill comes due. We’re screwed by the Speakers, Senate Presidents, and Governors of 10, 20, and 30 years ago.

Robert Craven: Speaker Shakashi’s been very intentional about his approach to housing specifically.

Steve Ahlquist: He has.

He’s taken a long-term view of this problem versus looking for an expedited short-term fix. That’s what the legislature should start doing on a lot of these issues, because an expedient solution might relieve the problem a little bit, but it creates higher costs and problems tomorrow. Having people in the State House who are forward-looking and understand today’s pressures, but also recognize that these problems are part of a broader issue, will help us develop a more sustainable policy path.

I get that, but on the other side, people are suffering right now, and long-term solutions don’t help a person experiencing homelessness or paying $2,000 a month in rent they can’t afford. That’s a new issue, and it also affects my own future. That’s also destroying a person’s potential and robbing their children of a future. There has to be a two-pronged attack here. Think climate change, for instance. We want to solve the issues of climate change, energy scarcity, and all that stuff, but we also have to mitigate the effects of climate change happening now, right? We’re spending money to build wind turbines. We also have to spend money to fortify houses against flooding or to move entire communities further up a hill or something.

Robert Craven: Stormwater abatement, and all of that.

Steve Ahlquist: All that, yes.

Robert Craven: That’s right. It’s a very careful balance. The governor always says that budgets are priorities, and there’s a lot of truth in that. Budgets show what we’re paying attention to as a state. There’s so much need today that to turn a blind eye to that would be negligent.

Steve Ahlquist: Other issues are coming down the road that we’re not paying attention to now. One is the trash, because the state landfill is filling up. We’re 10 or 15 years away, maybe less, from having to deal with that. What do we do with our garbage? Put it on a train and ship it to New Jersey>? And that becomes a cost. And nobody is going to want a garbage transfer station in their community.

Robert Craven: They’re going to look to the port towns, though, like the Port of Providence.

Steve Ahlquist: The people there do not deserve that. I can tell you right now. No way that’s happening without a fight.

Robert Craven: Not to mention the environmental cost of shipping away trash. There’s always going to be accidents.

Steve Ahlquist: And diesel. Those boats are not powered by solar. They’re powered by fossil fuels.

Robert Craven: And when you go out for a nice boat ride on Narragansett Bay, all of a sudden, you get the trash barge.

Steve Ahlquist: When you talk to voters, what are you hearing?

Robert Craven: I keep hearing about education and the funding formula. There’s a consensus that our funding formula needs work...

Steve Ahlquist: Though my understanding is that North Kingston does pretty well in the funding formula world.

Robert Craven: It does. And the town has invested heavily in its school system, and I think you’ve seen the positive impact on educational outcomes. I went to North Kingstown High School, and it afforded me every opportunity I would have wanted.

Steve Ahlquist: It’s a beautiful high school, and the kids I see there seem engaged...

Robert Craven: I went to something that the school hosts called Democracy Night. It’s a civics project where students present on an issue that matters to them. Many students presented on Career and Technical Education (CTE). There’s a lot more access to CTE in North Kingstown than there was when I was there. That’s a place where the state can grow by providing further opportunities in some of these trades.

The average plumber today is in their 50s. We don’t have people doing drywall. We don’t have people painting. These were always seen as honorable careers, but for some reason, we shifted our perspective on them. But a fully licensed plumber makes a six-figure salary in our state, and at the end of the day, that’s a great job and a lucrative career.

North Kingstown’s investment in schools also brings many people to town. And that, from a purely financial perspective, expands the tax base. It expands the town’s pull factor for people coming into town. You’re seeing a lot of families in their 40s coming in with young kids, seeking that education, which is a great boost to the town.

The funding formula struggles with transportation. It’s part of the formula where the funding follows the student. That leaves a hole unplugged in a school budget. Maybe you have a 25-kid class, and three go to another school, whether it’s a charter school, a private institution, or a trade school. You still have 22 kids in a class, teachers to pay, and utilities. You can’t shrink that classroom...

Steve Ahlquist: But you’ve lost- the $75,000 or whatever. That is a challenge. So you’re thinking about decoupling the money from the student...

Robert Craven: The Blue Ribbon Commission report that the Rhode Island Foundation led is a great place to start this conversation on how it can work for communities as diverse as North Kingstown, Central Falls, and Burrillville, because those districts have unique needs, and finding something that works for all of them, that’s affordable from the state and municipal perspective would go a long way towards boosting education generally.

Steve Ahlquist: Charter school proponents might not love tdecoupling that money because their funding depends, in part, on the money following the student into their school...

Robert Craven: They might not, but when we started having conversations as a state about charter schools, we were talking about filling a specific educational need that wasn’t being met in public education, such as the Trinity Academy for the Performing Arts (TAPA) here in Downtown Providence. That’s what charter schools were meant to be: not a parallel track to public education, but something specialized, where, if you had a student who wanted to go into areas the public education couldn’t supply the resources for, say, the performing arts. Then it makes sense, but what we’re doing is creating a parallel school system, which diverts funding from public education. That’s going to create a duality between haves and have-nots across school departments and systems.

Steve Ahlquist: My impression is that charter schools were an anti-union effort; an attempt to break the teachers’ unions. But now we’re seeing a big unionization effort in charter schools, which is fantastic. But that also gets back to your point about a parallel track. Now there are even fewer differences between the two school systems, and there’s less of a financial incentive, I guess, to think about charter schools, if teachers are going to unionize anyway.

Robert Craven: As a state, we should continue to invest in quality public education and support the rights of those who work in those institutions.

Steve Ahlquist: Is that something you got from your mom in her union work?

Robert Craven: I’m a member as well. I taught for four or five years at the Community College of Rhode Island as an adjunct faculty member. I’m part of the National Education Association (NEA).

Steve Ahlquist: That’s awesome. Good for you.

Robert Craven: But it is probably part of my upbringing, too. A collective voice, obviously, has much more power than the individual. That’s really what unions provide: an avenue for the collective to express its opinion and not be pushed to the margins of the conversation.

Steve Ahlquist: If elected, what committees would you like to be on?

Robert Craven: I think my experience lends itself to the Judiciary and Finance committee. But I also have a lot of interest in Municipal Government and Housing. We’ve talked a lot about housing, and that’s the committee that is at the front line of that conversation. And the State Elections and Government committee, because you’re seeing that committee become a lot more active, by necessity, because of what’s going on nationally. The chair, Evan Shanley, has done a good job pushing these conversations in a way that protects Rhode Islander’s access to the ballot, despite what’s happening elsewhere in the country.

Steve Ahlquist: I wanted to ask about that. Given all the extra challenges posed by the Trump Administration, including reduced funding for SNAP, healthcare, and more, our budget is under significant pressure. We’re talking about a one-percent or millionaire’s tax to try to make up for some of the money that’s going to be lost. Do you have any thoughts about this? I guess I don’t really have a question.

Robert Craven: Well, this is a hard budget cycle right now. Next year, we’re heading for a harder budget cycle. We’re not going to feel the impact of a lot of these federal changes, benefit cuts, and funding cuts until next year. They’ve passed, but the fiscal year hasn’t had time to react yet. So we’re going to really have to face this as a state next year and every year following, unless there’s a dramatic change at the federal level that brings all these resources back, and even then, we’re going to have a lag from lack of funding for a period of time.

So it’s the state’s responsibility to make sure it maintains those critical lifelines. We need to make sure that families can be fed and that people continue to have access to meaningful healthcare. Not just because it’s the right thing to do, but also because if people aren’t being fed, becoming homeless, and experiencing dangerous health situations, that puts a strain on our healthcare system that’s already bursting at the seams.

We have less money going into healthcare. We’ve diverted one hospital closure, but that doesn’t mean we’re out of the wilderness.

Steve Ahlquist: The attorney general said we might be dealing with this again in three months or a year.

Robert Craven: I hope not.

Steve Ahlquist: Me too.

Robert Craven: But it’s something that we should be prepared for regardless. I don’t think we want this undue dependence on what we have right now.

How do we pay for all of this? I believe in progressive taxation. It makes sense as a public policy. I hear a lot of conversation, both in the State House and elsewhere, that our budget is bloated. Ensuring that we’re responsibly spending is a pillar of government, as is ensuring that we’re not wasting taxpayer money and betraying taxpayer trust. But the fact that the budget has grown doesn’t necessarily mean that we’re being irresponsible. We’re putting money into projects that are necessary and meaningful, and if we end up using state money to plug some of these federal budget holes, that’s not irresponsible.

It’s right and responsible because these expenditures have a trickle-down effect across the rest of the government. It’s naive to think that if we ignore these issues, they won’t weigh on the state.

Steve Ahlquist: Isn’t the point of government and the budget to serve the people?

Robert Craven: Absolutely.

Steve Ahlquist: And if we’re not feeding and housing people ... I mean, that’s baseline.

Robert Craven: Food and shelter are the core needs everyone has.

Steve Ahlquist: If we can’t provide that, I don’t know what we’re doing as a society.

Robert Craven: It’s an obligation. I don’t think anyone is saying, “I expect not to work and get everything for free.” If you spoke to people in these lower-income brackets, they want to be able to work. They want to be honorable citizens, but there’s so much pulling on them. These are the people working two or three jobs to sustain themselves.

Steve Ahlquist: I know.

Robert Craven: And I don’t know what’s harder work than that.

Steve Ahlquist: They work harder than and deal with more stress than anyone else. Imagine the stress of knowing one medical emergency can sink your life.

Robert Craven: And people are avoiding treatment. The Treasurer’s office runs a medical debt forgiveness program that’s helped forgive about $12 million worth of medical debt so far. We’re getting some data on the demographics of the people in this program. Before we undertook this, I expected to see many older individuals, but the average person is in their 40s, people in the lower income brackets...

Steve Ahlquist: The 40s are when the medical issues start to hit.

Robert Craven: Absolutely, and that’s evident by what we’re seeing. The average debt is between $7000 and $8,000 dollars, and I don’t think people who could afford that would let that debt linger, so I’m left with the conclusion that these are people who can’t pay that bill. The program affects people who are below 400% of the federal poverty line, or whose debt is more than 5% of their income.

Steve Ahlquist: What’s your sales pitch as to why people should vote for you?

Robert Craven: Over the past few years, I have developed experience and relationships to help government work for people and accomplish meaningful change at the state level. That’s what I want to bring to North Kingstown. I developed skills and relationships that help our town move forward. A lot of people are stuck thinking that our best days are behind us, and as a state and as a town, we have to be reminded that better days are still ahead. It’s hard not to get caught in that in the moment and say, “I prefer what it used to be.” But I want to think about what can be, and there’s a lot of positive in that.

Steve Ahlquist: As an aside, do you consider yourself to be a progressive?

Robert Craven: I would describe myself as a pragmatic progressive.

Steve Ahlquist: Can you explain that?

Robert Craven: I believe in many progressive principles: that people deserve equal rights, that we should feed people, and that we should have access to healthcare. But I also think that a step towards progress is a positive thing, and sometimes we’re not going to see policy move in leaps and bounds. Sometimes we’re going to be inching forward, but every inch is a positive on the path to that end.

Steve Ahlquist: Incrementalist.

Robert Craven: Yes.

SteveAhlquist.news is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.