Menu Bar

Home           Calendar           Topics          Just Charlestown          About Us
Showing posts with label Jimmy Carter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jimmy Carter. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 4, 2025

Deregulation. Privatization. Tax cuts. Free trade. Stagnant pay for most. A soaring stock market for the top.

These are all self-inflicted wounds

Robert Reich for Inequality Media

I rarely ask you to look at charts. Today is an exception. This one is from the Economic Policy Institute. It compares the typical American’s pay starting just after World War II (light blue line) with the nation’s increasing productivity since then (dark blue).

The chart shows the widening divergence between the rise of pay and the yields from productivity.


In the first three decades after World War II, the typical American’s pay rose in tandem with the nation’s growing productivity. The benefits from higher productivity were broadly shared.

But then, starting in the late 1970s and dramatically after 1980, pay barely grew, even as productivity continued to soar. The benefits from higher productivity went increasingly to the top.

Why?

I’ve been looking into this question for a long time.

I’ve also been living it, as head of policy for the Federal Trade Commission under Jimmy Carter, secretary of labor in the Clinton administration, and an economic adviser to Obama. I’ve chronicled this in my upcoming memoir, Coming Up Short.

Much of the answer has to do with a giant upward shift in power.

It started in 1971, with a memo written for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce by Lewis Powell exhorting corporations to play a far more active role in American politics. They did, and their increasingly active role paid off, at least for their CEOs and top investors.

It continued through Reagan’s tax cuts and deregulation, his legitimization of union bashing, and the emergence of corporate raiders who insisted that corporations maximize shareholder value above all else.

And onward through George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton’s North American Free Trade Agreement, their support for China’s accession to the World Trade Organization, and their deregulation of Wall Street.

And then through George W. Bush’s tax cut — again, mainly for big corporations and wealthy individuals — and Barack Obama’s bailout of Wall Street after it nearly destroyed the world economy.

Deregulation. Privatization. Tax cuts. Free trade. Stagnant pay for most. A soaring stock market for the top.

That’s the legacy of neoliberalism.

It also brought us Trump — who exploited the anger and resentment stirred up by all this and pretended to be a strongman on the side of the working class (while quietly giving the emerging American oligarchy everything else it wanted, including a giant tax cut; he’s readying another as you read this).

Monday, April 28, 2025

Donald Trump respectfully falls asleep at Pope Francis' funeral


When it's not enough to demand a front row seat, violate the Vatican request to wear a black suit and black tie, and to leave after only a few hours to play golf at your New Jersey course.

He also fell asleep during his own trial:


And during the Republican National Convention:


During the prayer service at the National Cathedral after his inauguration:

And at Jimmy Carter's funeral:


It's hard when you have the attention span of a 5-year old 



Monday, December 30, 2024

Jimmy Carter’s human rights focus helped dismantle the Soviet Union

A century of service

Robert C. Donnelly, Gonzaga University

Former President Jimmy Carter, who died on Dec. 29, 2024, at age 100 at his home in Plains, Georgia, was a dark horse Democratic presidential candidate with little national recognition when he beat Republican incumbent Gerald Ford in 1976.

The introspective former peanut farmer pledged a new era of honesty and forthrightness at home and abroad, a promise that resonated with voters eager for change following the Watergate scandal and the Vietnam War.

His presidency, however, lasted only one term before Ronald Reagan defeated him. Since then, scholars have debated – and often maligned – Carter’s legacy, especially his foreign policy efforts that revolved around human rights.

Critics have described Carter’s foreign policies as “ineffectual” and “hopelessly muddled,” and their formulation demonstrated “weakness and indecision.”

As a historian researching Carter’s foreign policy initiatives, I conclude his overseas policies were far more effective than critics have claimed.

Two men in suits and ties, talking with their heads close.
President Jimmy Carter listens to Sen. Joseph R. Biden, D-Del.,
 as they wait to speak at fund raising reception in Wilmington,
Del. on Feb. 20, 1978.
 AP Photo/Barry Thumma, File

EDITOR'S PERSONAL NOTE: In 1978, I was offered a job in Washington to work at the Legal Services Corp. Cathy and I went down to DC to talk about what we should do. We were sitting in the rooftop restaurant of the Hotel Washington overlooking the White House when Jimmy Carter's motorcade returned to the White House from the signing of the Camp David accords. I looked at Cathy and said, "Yeah, we could get used to this." She nodded and we spent most of the rest of our careers in DC returning to live in Charlestown in 2002. Thank you, Mr. President, for the inspiration.     - Will Collette

Thursday, November 2, 2023

President Carter’s many months on hospice highlight a surprising truth

Hospice care can actually extend life as well as quality of life

By Diana Franchitto, Rhode Island Current

 (Adam Schultz, The White House via AP)
I saw a clip last month of President Jimmy Carter, now 99 years old, taking a ride with his wife through a peanut festival in their hometown. 

That’s a happy story for many reasons. As the former president approaches his eighth month on hospice care, it’s also a chance to clear up a common myth.

Back in February, when the president’s family announced he was ending curative treatments and beginning hospice, it was perhaps natural to assume he wouldn’t live much longer. Instead, President Carter has spent the better part of a year not just holding on, but truly living — in the ways that matter most to him, like with a celebratory drive beside his sweetheart. 

Like many others, I was grateful to President Carter for publicly sharing his decision to begin hospice those many months ago, because it helped us raise awareness about this crucial type of care. Now, his long run on hospice gives us a chance to spotlight a truth that many find surprising: Some patients actually live longer on hospice.

Sunday, October 15, 2023

Why we can’t quit election polls

Often in error but still seductive

W. Joseph Campbell, American University School of Communication

Polls showed Joe Biden, right, holding double-digit leads
over Donald Trump, left, in the run-up to the 2020 election,
but he won election by only 4.5 percentage points. 
AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, File
Their record is uneven. They misfired in one way or another in the past three presidential elections. And yet the prevalence of election polls is undiminished. Thirteen months before the 2024 election, polls are many – and inescapable.

Why is that? What explains polling’s abiding appeal despite its performance record?

The reasons go beyond facile analogies that election polls are akin to weather forecasts in offering a fluid, if sometimes contradictory, sense of what lies ahead.

Polls and poll-based forecasts are not always in error, as I noted in my 2020 book, “Lost in a Gallup: Polling Failure in U.S. Presidential Elections.” Their enduring appeal rests in part in offering a sense of data-based certainty that can be irresistible, especially to journalists who tend to value precision in a field awash with ambiguity.

It is hardly surprising, then, that news organizations also are polling operations. Ties to election polling live deep in the media’s DNA.

Wednesday, June 14, 2023

A Criminal President -- with Accomplices

Trump is not our first criminal president

By Thom Hartmann for the Independent Media Institute

Donald Trump has been indicted on seven federal felonies.

Most Americans view Donald Trump as an aberration, a one-off, the exception. He’s our first “criminal president” they think, the first to have committed crimes to get into office, while in office, or both.

Most Americans, in this regard, are wrong, and it’s a tragic statement about both the way we teach American history in our schools and the way our corporate media deals with past presidential crimes.

If previous Republican presidents had been held to account for their crimes the way it appears Trump is about to be, Trump may well have not been as brazen in everything from his violations of the Hatch Act to the Espionage Act to his explicitly asking Vladimir Putin to intervene in the 2016 election.

Everybody knows that Richard Nixon got caught orchestrating and then covering up a break-in at the DNC headquarters in the Watergate complex, and that he avoided going to prison by resigning his office. Yet it’s no secret that Nixon committed a far more serious crime — naked treason — just to get into office in the first place.

When the LBJ White House tapes were released in 2013, the world learned that Johnson had negotiated a secret deal with the Vietnamese to end the war in the late fall of the election year of 1968.

Nixon got wind of it and, through a campaign aide during a meeting in his New York apartment, reached out to the South Vietnamese ambassador offering inducements to pull out of the peace talks and scuttle the deal, which they then abandoned just as it was about to be signed.

Monday, July 18, 2022

The importance of elders

Researchers argue that the long human lifespan is due in part to the contributions of older adults

University of California - Santa Barbara


According to long-standing canon in evolutionary biology, natural selection is cruelly selfish, favoring traits that help promote reproductive success. This usually means that the so-called "force" of selection is well equipped to remove harmful mutations that appear during early life and throughout the reproductive years. 

However, by the age fertility ceases, the story goes that selection becomes blind to what happens to our bodies. After the age of menopause, our cells are more vulnerable to harmful mutations. In the vast majority of animals, this usually means that death follows shortly after fertility ends.

Which puts humans (and some species of whale) in a unique club: animals that continue to live long after their reproductive lives end. How is it that we can live decades in selection's shadow?

Wednesday, April 20, 2022

It’s Time to Nationalize the Fossil Fuel Industry

We've nationalized industries before

By Thom Hartmann for the Independent Media Institute

FREDERIC J. BROWN / AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES
If you want to trigger a conservative, just suggest nationalizing the US gas and oil industry. “Venezuela!” they’ll scream hysterically, perhaps adding a few, “Iran!” squeals. (Somehow, they always forget to yell about Norway…)


Within minutes they’ll be croaking about that time back in 2008 when Maxine Waters — a Black woman with power and therefore the most terrifying thing Republicans can imagine — threatened oil industry CEOs who were giving Congress deliberately deceptive and incomplete answers with “socializing… taking over and the government running all your companies.”


Immediately, Fox “News” was all over it, as were dozens of rightwing sites.  


In that, they’ve completely ignored (or never knew) the long American history of taking over industries during a time of national crisis.


Monday, March 21, 2022

As inevitable as blood and taxes

A brief history of oil and warfare.

Peter Dykstra

By Chris Britt
Just like the looming disaster in our future, the unfolding tragedies in Ukraine are rooted in oil.

One of the less-remembered aspects of World War I is Britain’s effort to corner the then-nascent market in Middle Eastern oil.

“Oil explorer” William Reynolds drilled seven years of desert dry holes in what is now known as Iran before his first big strike in 1908. The Anglo-Persian Oil Company was born, and the rush was on.

Turkey militarily challenged Britain’s oil control during and after the war. A young Territories Minister named Winston Churchill fended them off, including the first, primitive aerial use of chemical weapons: Barrels of phosgene gas hurled off a biplane.

The Turks had a major oil strike near Kirkuk, Iraq, in 1927. In Saudi Arabia 11 years later, an American-owned well came in—the first strike in what became known as the world’s largest oil field.

In World War II, a major part of Japan’s strategy was to cripple the U. S. Navy, then make a run to capture the oil fields in Indonesia and Malaysia. The Germans staged their ill-fated betrayal of the Soviet Union in part to seize the Caspian Sea oilfields. While many feel the Nazis lost the war with this failed move, it was a loss caused by an Army’s need for oil.

In 1953, fed up with his nation ’s fealty to oil, Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh nationalized Big Oil’s Iranian assets. He fell victim to a coup the same year—even though it took nearly 70 years for the U.S. to admit what the rest of the world had long assumed: The CIA had staged the coup.

Let’s race through a few more oily events.

Friday, March 4, 2022

Why Does Everything the GOP Touches Cause Poverty, Disease & Death?

Political party or death cult?

By Thom Hartmann for the Independent Media Institute


Senator Marco Rubio says he won’t attend the State of the Union address because it requires a Covid test and he’s too busy to swab his nose. Rubio’s bizarre behavior is right in line with the GOP’s embrace of poverty, disease, and death. 

According to a popular meme, comedian Noel Casler (the guy who outed Trump’s drug abuse and diaper wearing) asks, “How come everything the Republican Party stands for involves other people dying?”


He then goes on to note GOP support for assault weapons, opposition to masks and vaccines, opposition to saving the environment, and their all-out war on Obamacare and Medicare-for-All. 


Casler may have just being glib, doing the written equivalent of a standup routine, but his question deserves a serious answer, so let’s look at the evidence.


It’s undeniably true that Republican-controlled “Red” states, almost across the board, have higher rates of:

But are all these things, along with widespread GOP support for Putin, happening because Republicans hate their citizens and worship poverty, death and disease?  


Or is there something in the GOP’s core beliefs and stratgegies that just inevitably leads to these outcomes?