Menu Bar

Home           Calendar           Topics          Just Charlestown          About Us

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Abel Collins for Congress, Second District?

Not
If you voted for Nader in 2000 – and like the way that turned out – vote for Collins
By Will Collette

Now that campaign signs are starting to sprout along Route One – mostly “Mattson the Carpenter” but also signs for independent Abel Collins, it’s worth noting that there’s a race on for U.S. House District 2, the seat held by Congressman Jim Langevin.

The dilemma for progressives is that most of the candidates we really like can’t get elected to office, though there are some exceptions.


Abel Collins, a 33 year old RI native who lives in Matunuck, is running as an independent for Congress, opposing Rep. Jim Langevin and whoever wins the Republican primary.

Collins is a good person, a progressive who works long and hard for the Sierra Club of Rhode Island. He wants to get people more involved in politics by overcoming their apathy and cynicism, wants to take on the Big Banks and promote green jobs.

All of these goals are excellent. Except I am concerned his candidacy could have the opposite effect.

In 2012, voters will decide who sits in the White House and who controls Congress. Rep. Jim Langevin is a moderate Democrat who has served Rhode Island well. He is not anywhere near as far to the left as Collins. But he believes in most of the things I care about and works hard for his District. Plus, as the Republicans in Congress have become more extreme and hard-right, Rep. Langevin has gotten more progressive.

Whatever votes Collins secures are most likely going to come from the Democratic (and independent) left, people who would otherwise vote for Langevin, because they are certainly not going to vote for Langevin’s Republican opponent.

Indeed, the probable Republican candidate, Michael Riley, is the anti-Collins. Riley is a hedge fund operator who retired after a wild and wooly career pumping stock futures like Lehman Brothers and tech companies (before the bubble burst) on the Chicago Commodities market.

Riley commented that he really didn’t care whether those companies lived or died, just that he made short-term profits for his clients (and himself, of course).

Riley decided to retire to Rhode Island, unretired, and started some new hedge funds, as well as the non-profit RI Hedge Fund Association dedicated to convincing the public that hedge fund operators are being picked on unfairly.

Riley intends to self-fund his own campaign against Langevin using his own millions.
What Michael Riley has in mind for federal lands like the
Ninigret National Wildlife Refuge

Riley’s core issue is his cracked teapot plan to fund Social Security and Medicare by opening up federal land to massive oil, gas and coal mining. Imagine natural gas ”Christmas Trees” in the Ninigret National Wildlife Refuge.

Riley is already running warm and fuzzy TV ads on the Rhode Island stations – you may have seen them – touting this mathematically impossible environmental abomination.

All of the main issues in Abel Collins’ campaign platform are mirrored – truly mirrored in that they are the exact opposite – in Michael Riley’s campaign.


Abel Collins was 21 years old when Al Gore ran against George W. Bush (and Ralph Nader), so I hope he remembers the election of 2000 as well as I do.

I liked Al Gore, but wasn’t too thrilled with his milquetoast, middle-of-the-road campaign. I knew George W. Bush was going to be a disaster. Nader entered the campaign thinking much the same way as Abel Collins – re-energize the electorate, challenge the big money interests, promote green initiatives, etc.

But it turned out to be a really big mistake. I respected Ralph Nader and appreciated the help he gave to Lois Gibbs and me when we were organizing communities to fight hazardous wastes. He was an inspiration to hundreds of grassroots environmental leaders who gathered at the first national grassroots environmental convention in 1993.

But he gave in to ego in 2000 and cost Al Gore the election. Take out the Nader votes and Gore would not only have won Florida but several other states and we would have been spared the horrors we still suffer under today. Ralph has never admitted that he gravely miscalculated the consequences of what he did.

Collins cites Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont and interestingly, not Ralph Nader, as the role model for his campaign. Bernie is a great Senator. He is officially listed as an independent, caucuses with the Democrats, but is proud to call himself a Socialist.

But one big difference between Collins and Bernie Sanders is that Bernie worked his way up through the ranks, running for and holding local office, including mayor of Burlington, before running for the House and after many years, moving up to the Senate.

I think Abel Collins would have been a dynamite candidate for South Kingstown Town Council, a dysfunctional body that needs fresh blood and new ideas. And it’s also a place where a novice can begin the process of getting some political seasoning.

Why challenge Jim Langevin and why now? The nationwide battle for control of the US House of Representatives, currently controlled by Tea Party Republicans is a national battle for survival.

The last thing Rhode Island needs is to send a Tea Party guy like Michael Riley to Washington. Indeed, given that all of Riley’s positions are anathema to Collins, you’d think that the best way for Collins to act on his convictions would be to fight to make sure Riley does not get elected by making sure that Langevin does.

Despite his non sequitur campaign slogan, “ElectAbel,” he’s not. And playing a Nader-style spoiler against Langevin is not the way to advance the noble positions he espouses.

9 comments:

  1. Abel has broad support from all sides of the political spectrum. He is speaking the truth that neither party can, about the need for reform of the economic sytem and for common sense reforms that will bring jobs back to Rhode Island. A look at his positions will show that his issues are beyond partisan.
    I remember the Nader debacle, but remember, Rhode Island is different from the nation at large. More voters are registered independents (unaffiliated) than are members of the parties. We are a very independent state, and in a race against a Langevin weakened by poor approval ratings and a primary, Abel Collins stands a good chance. Also, in the absence of term limits, after twelve years of very little action from Langevin, voters are ready to set their own limits. Better Collins than Riley, certainly.
    In addition to this, Riley may have a sign or two up, but a derivatives trader making comments regarding his willingness to "spend what it takes to win" is not an easy sell to today's voters. Rhode Islanders are not fools.
    Abel COllins is 34, by the way.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry about missing Abel's birthday. I used bio material from a June 15 Patch piece on his candidacy. Happy birthday.

    Look, I don't doubt his sincerity and am fine with his stances on the issues.

    I just think this is a bad time to mess around with a 3rd party Naderesque quest. Democrats will be fighting like hell to save David Cicilline's 1st District seat and really don't need the distraction in the 2nd District, especially with another right-wing gazillionaire teabagger in the race.

    I would like to see these "poor approval ratings" you say Langevin has. I'd also like to know what kind of primary threat you think Mattson the Carpenter poses that might "weaken" Langevin in the general election.

    Riley does plan, as you say, to "spend whatever it takes to win." I stand by my suggestion that the best way for Abel to act on his convictions is to help make sure Jim Langevin beats this guy in November, and not try to siphon off votes on the left.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Will, I usually agree with your analysis but I think you are off here on several counts.

    First of all, the so-called Nader effect is a farse. As Nader has demonstrated many times the math is wrong, we have a crazy electoral system not a popular vote system. There is no Nader effect. Next,
    Gore lost because Bush and the Republicans cheated. The election fraud- using caging lists to disenfranchise voters, the hanging chad's and a host of irregularities led to our the Supreme Court presidential decision, a court that "Bush the Smarter" stacked. Finally, I remember the election and Al Gore was a stuffy wonk that went right over peoples head, had he run as the "Inconvenient Truth" Al Gore that had a passionate connection with people it never would have been that close. As you suggest his campaign team should have made him a better candidate. I remember explaining Gore to people ad nauseum, Bush was politics for dummies.

    In the end the Democratic Party lost him the election by not challenging the fraud, which encouraged the Republicans to cheat again in Bush's reelection in Ohio. Remember the vote laundering? Before it could go to trial the guy who came clean died in a plane crash- just like in a Tin-Pot dictatorship.

    Why did the Democratic Party take this lying down? Why do they run these Right of Center, unprincipled, middle of the road campaigns? It gets back to Nader's critique, which is the real comparison between Nader and Collins. Both parties represent Multi-National Corporate interests first and formost- the duopoly. Collins wrote eloquently about this in his OpEd in Projo. Collins has taken a principled stand and it will interesting to see how Rhode Islanders respond. If 40 progressive independents won and caucuses with the Progressive Caucus in the House, leadership would not be able to stymie them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mattson provides an alternative and it will see how he fares as the wheels of the Democratic Party Machine in RI attempt to crush him to protect their pet incumbent who votes like a rubber stamp with party leadership 95% of the time. As past elections have shown, about 40% of Rhode Islanders in CD2 want a more progressive representative. If Mattson loses who will they vote for, Riley or Russo?

    As Democratic Polling guru Mark Penn pointed out, this election is more about appealing to independents. Independents are the majority in RI, not Democrats, and Mattson will have to distinguish himself as the better alternative. There are a lot of old fashioned conservatives who think that Wall Street has gotten away with murder- they are equal opportunity exploiters and they have raided their bank accounts as well. When they listen to Collins talk about how LIBOR interest rigging scandal shows the multi-national too big to fail banks have conspired against everyone including cities and towns with phony bond products and ratings, they get it. Also Collins has worked to build up a sustainable economy in RI which has brought back RI small farming, the only growth sector in our economy which has had a lot of appeal to the usually more conservative rural voters in the district that usually trend Republican.

    If Mattson wins it will be a very interesting debate, you might decide you prefer the Brown educated political scientist whose positions are carefully thought out and grounded sounds better to you than Mattson, who has been a Republican and an Independent in the past.

    In the end, in Washington, I believe that an Independent will have the advantage. Party leadership will not be able to stifle him and will be forced to work with him, which is where the Sanders comparison with Collins is instructive. Also, Abel is an activist, with a history of working for working people and common sense solutions, not a party hack that is in it for h.is personal gain. If elected, this is one seat the people of RI will own, no corporation is sponsoring him

    I also think you overestimate Riley and possibly the money factor in RI. Riley couldn't get himself elected to Narragansett Town Council. Russo, who did work her way up, another bit of conventional wisdom that is over-rated, is a full on Capital T Tea Partier with passion to spare but position far to the right of RI Republicans. I heard the sound bite of Riley's announcement and my impression was that he was a know-it-all New Yorker from Wall Street who thought that this is a good time to buy an election. No positions, no plans, just grease the palms. There is an article in Tuesdays Projo that basically says the same thing.

    Native Rhode Islanders don't take kindly to transplants coming in and taking over- maybe the Riley campaign will implode from foot in mouth syndrom & Russo will be the Republican.

    Right left and center hate the Citizens United decision and the national corporate TV slime fest is on. We don't know the effect but it's possible it will numb the public and strengthen the effect of word of mouth. Rhode Island is a small State where everybody knows someone.
    It will take a lot of citizen engagement and open minded discussions to get Abel over the top.
    Technically, that is what democracy is all about.

    ReplyDelete
  5. When you get to hear Abel speak you may find it difficult not to tell someone what he has said. Ask any one that has heard him speak on behalf of the Sierra Club at the Statehouse or watch the videos on his website. He's running for congress because that's where the issues he wants to address are, they are not Town Council issues.

    Finally, Jack Kennedy was 29 when he was first elected to congress. He had no experience and he turned out pretty good. Abel doesn't have the Kennedy machine behind him, all he has is everyday people if we give him a chance and stand on principle. Congress's rating has inched up to 16%, isn't it time for a change in a progressive direction?

    Thanks for listening Will, I am tired now but I read this yesterday and it's been on my mind.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jack Kennedy was groomed by his father his whole life to be President.

      Delete
    2. It's not accurate to say JFK was groomed by his father for his whole life to be President. JFK's father intended that eldest son Joseph Jr. would be the man Joseph Sr. would groom and push to power.

      It was only after Joseph Jr. was killed during World War II that Jack Kennedy, reluctantly, became the heir apparent.

      Regarding the statistics about Congress's standing, there is no question that polls show terrible numbers for this Congress, largely due to the leadership of the right-wing loonies running the House of Representatives.

      But it's an unwarranted - and unsubstantiated leap to project those poor poll numbers for Congress in general onto Rep. Langevin in particular. In fact, he enjoys a high approval rating among his constituents.

      Delete
  6. Beth Richardson comments
    If we want to change Washington there must be turnover in Congress. Sticking with the same ole same ole will bring more of the same. Congress' approval rating is in the gutter (I read somewhere that it is lower than American approval of polygamy!) yet incumbents keep being elected. Dems blame Reps; Reps blame Dems.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I know Mike Riley. He is so off base in his views. I am from New York and I worked with him. He thinks if you are a liberal as i am that he can read your mind. He is extreme and is not worthy of the congress.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated so your comment will not appear immediately.