Keep the nuclear launch codes away from this woman
![]() |
| Don't let Connie Baker near this |
By Will Collette
Connie Baker, one of CCA’s candidates for Planning
Commission, is currently a member of the Affordable Housing Commission (AHC).
Baker joined the AHC because she doesn’t like, or believe in, affordable
housing as a responsibility of the town, despite the state law that mandates
it.
She wants to make the move to Planning, believing that she can be more
effective at blocking affordable housing developments there, where Planning has shown it holds the ultimate Power to Obstruct.
But meantime, she’s stuck at AHC.
An alert reader tipped me off and suggested I read the draft
minutes that were, at the time, posted on Clerkbase. On July 19, due to the
absence of the AHC’s Secretary Suzanne Ferrio, Baker took on the job of acting
Secretary. She really showed her stuff when she stepped up to this greater
responsibility.
If you read the minutes Baker took for that meeting, you’ll be in for a little surprise,
though.
Not only does Baker display some interesting ways of
spelling “Ferrio” – three different ways, which should make Suzanne hesitate
before she misses another meeting – but there’s also this gem:
As soon as I saw these minutes, I made sure to copy them.
Good thing I did, because they have since been pulled down from the Town’s
web site, but the toothpaste is out of the tube, thanks to Connie Baker.
Ms. Baker will need a little remedial work so that she can
better understand the CCA’s policy on “openness and transparency,” namely that
the CCA expects openness and transparency in others, not in themselves. Rarely
do you ever hear a CCA-endorsed town official criticized for disclosing
too much.
Baker may also pose another problem for the CCA slate.
Apparently, Baker does not like long meetings. According to those same (now disappeared) minutes, Baker pushed her colleagues on the Affordable Housing
Commission to adopt her motion limiting AHC meetings to 90 minutes.
Apparently, the CCA didn’t vet her on this issue, which seems
to be one of great importance to them. Under the nimble leadership of Council
Boss Tom Gentz, Town Council meetings routinely turn into marathon affairs,
rarely going under three hours. Often, these meetings not only exceed three to
three and a half hours, but also require a second, continuation meeting that
often runs another two or three hours.
Each time this happens, Gentz cracks jokes that he’s willing
to continue the meeting until 2 or 3 AM. My theory is that he learned from his long
years as a health insurance executive how to run the clock to exhaust the
energy and patience of his opponents. It doesn't seem to matter to Gentz that he himself tends to fall apart after ninety minutes and sometimes less – he sure does love his long meetings.
The Planning Commission – the office that Connie Baker seeks
to be elected to in November – is even worse. Under the leadership of Planning
Commissar Ruth Platner, the Planning Commission holds two monthly meetings – a regular
meeting and a “workshop” – and these meetings each take three hours, whether
they have anything to talk about or not.
Is Baker up to that? Can she handle the kind of endurance-test-level meetings that the CCA's elected town officials have made the standard for Charlestown? Or will she poop out – or bug out – of meetings that last more than 90 minutes?
Yep, another fine specimen of public service.
Editor's note: the link to the original document has been redacted to remove an inappropriate personal comment by Council President Gentz about a town employee to preserve the privacy of that employee. For an explanation, see the comment below from Evelyn Smith.
Editor's note: the link to the original document has been redacted to remove an inappropriate personal comment by Council President Gentz about a town employee to preserve the privacy of that employee. For an explanation, see the comment below from Evelyn Smith.

Iron Lady: Gotta love it! Just doesn't get any better than this in Charlestown...or should I say "Wonderland."
ReplyDeleteMeeting minutes are a matter of Public Record once they are posted. Just WHO pulled them and under WHAT AUTHORITY? Another screaming example of why Uncle Fluffy must go in November.
ReplyDeleteCCA claims to promote professionalism in town government, and yet the officials elected under the CCA banner don't seem to display a whole lot of it, do they.
DeleteThose were draft minutes, not approved meeting minutes, so they can be pulled down for any reason of inaccuracy.
DeleteTY for clarifying that, Fred...
DeleteFor the record, Will, I am the one who asked that the DRAFT minutes be taken down from the web site because they inappropriately reported personal health information about a town employee, AND FOR NO OTHER REASON. I assure you that everything else in the draft minutes will be fully reflected in the minutes that will be approved by the full Commission on Thursday and posted in accordance with the Open Meeting Act. There is no requirement that Draft Minutes be posted, unless approved minutes are not available within the time permitted. Although the AHC tries to put draft minutes up as soon as possible, in this case I felt it necessary to wait for the approved minutes out of respect for the privacy of the employee whose health issues should not have been included in the public record.
DeleteAlso for the record, Mr. Gentz and Ms. Baker did NOT reveal any confidential information about the Washington County Community Development Corporation's proposed Church Woods project, a proposed elderly housing complex to be situated on land adjacent to the Church of the Holy Spirit. That proposal has already been publicly reviewed by the AHC for bond funding suitability, and has been awarded a bond grant for pre-application expense, as well as a conditional approval of a land acquisition grant, at public Town Council meetings. The pre-application grant was to be used to complete engineering that would be needed, among other things, to determine the number of units that could be supported by the property, so that a fair purchase price could be negotiated.
Mr. Gentz reported to the Commission that the project was moving forward, into purchase price negotiations. This was welcome news for the Commission, as it indicated that the engineering studies had confirmed the feasibility of the project. The "information" Mr. Gentz and Ms. Baker referred to as not being "for public knowledge at this time" was the purchase price being negotiated by the WCCDC. That information will be disclosed in the course of the actual project application, when that is ready to be submitted.
So, no big mystery, no big gaffe, no misunderstanding of confidentiality, no reason for taking down the draft minutes to be found in that paragraph.
I trust that before posting this reply, you will look again at your Google doc copy and do the right thing, respecting the employee's right to privacy, and take down the draft minutes or at least excise that invasive and otherwise irrelevant paragraph.
Evelyn - thank you for your comments, as always. I will redact the personal reference in the draft minutes and re-post them.
DeleteI don't dispute the decision to pull the minutes off the town website. As soon as I saw them, I could see the problem. I think you made the right decision. My point was to question the acts and the judgment of Connie Baker, and also those of our Town Council President Tom Gentz.
Gentz made the inappropriate remarks at a public meeting, Baker recorded them, and they were put up on the town's website.
You were able to correctly deal with the last of those acts, but of course, there's nothing you can do about Gentz's and Baker's poor judgment.