Menu Bar

Home           Calendar           Topics          Just Charlestown          About Us
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Steering Committee. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Steering Committee. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, June 4, 2015

CCA Party rearranges the pool chairs

New Steering Committee roster posted with no fanfare
By Will Collette
New information emerges from the CCA Party's secret clubhouse
The Charlestown Citizens Alliance (CA Party) is all about restoring Charlestown to roughly the 1920s and 30s. Yes, the 1920s and 30s were the halcyon years and also when most of the current CCA Steering Committee members were born. The average age for the ten Steering Committee members is 76 years old, with the youngest at 63 and oldest at 87.

They would love to restore things to the way it used to be. The times after the Narragansett Tribe was declared extinct by the General Assembly in 1880 and 1882 when Charlestown’s leading families grabbed all their land but of course before the Tribe won federal recognition and a major part of its ancestral lands.

The time before the Ninigret Navy Auxiliary Air Field was built. The time when wealthy gentlemen farmers ruled the roost with their farms covering most of the land. If your family couldn’t trace itself back to the town’s first settlers, you were nobody.

The CCA Party does not make a big deal about its Steering Committee, even though they meet monthly to presumably decide the organization’s priorities. These meetings are not public and not announced. I’ve often speculated that they meet in a little hut in the reeds in the salt marsh or maybe a tree house in the woods, but no one outside the CCA Party inner circle knows.

How these meetings are conducted and how decisions are made is totally secret, even though the CCA Party controls every elected office, important commission and the hiring and firing of Town Hall Staff.

Who attends those meetings is also secret. I guess it has to be considering that they hold all five Council seats and all eight Planning Commission seats. If those members came to Steering Committee meetings and discussed anything related to Charlestown, they would be violating the state Open Meetings Act

Monday, July 18, 2011

CSI Charlestown - what happened to Tom Gentz and Dr. Krantz?

Tom Gentz: Have you seen this man?
UPDATED

Here's one for the Missing Persons Bureau—only one month after announcing an internal leadership shakeup and rearrangement of their officers' and Steering Committee members' roles, two of the CCA officers, Town Council President Tom Gentz and Dr. Milton Krantz, seem to have disappeared.

While you will soon be seeing their faces on the sides of milk cartons, your humble sleuths at Progressive Charlestown have launched an investigation into their disappearances.


Wednesday, May 16, 2012

CCA adjusts leadership as old members leave the state

Did they have elections and nobody knew?
By Will Collette

With no announcement, just some minor modifications to the leadership list on their website, the Charlestown Citizens Alliance (CCA) has changed its line-up. Their actual process for making such decisions is a closely held secret

CCA President Bernice Krantz will hand over the scepter of power to Virginia Wooten in June. Leo Mainelli will remain as the CCA’s Treasurer.

Mrs. Krantz and her husband Dr. Milton Krantz are moving out of state after selling their home on King Tom Road for well over a million dollars. They are remaining on the Steering Committee.

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Understanding the CCA, Part 1

Part of an American tradition of “Rich People’s Movements”
By Will Collette

It’s an election year and time for an updated review of the Charlestown Citizens Alliance (CCA Party), Charlestown’ rulers since 2008 which will be published here in at least two parts.  Click here and here for the 2012 versions.

They are running candidates for Town Council, Planning Commission, Chariho School Committee and Town Moderator – a total of 13 – and, if they all get elected in November, it will extend the CCA Party’s hegemony over Charlestown for at least another two years, if not longer.

With that in mind, it’s a pretty good idea for voters to take a long, hard look at the Charlestown Citizens Alliance – its history, what it stands for and what it has done to Charlestown.

Before we get into the details, here’s a warm-up exercise that will get your mind in the right place to understand the CCA Party. Click on the “Find the Invisible Cow” game and play it for a few rounds. It will make the rest of this article a lot easier to understand.

Like the Invisible Cow, the CCA Party is rarely seen until you come close to the interests of its wealthy backers. Then it becomes very loud and makes its presence felt. Click here for a prime example.

Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Environmentalism, Bizarro Charlestown–style

Previously in Bizarro Charlestown:

By Linda Felaco

In “Raiders of the Lost Platform,” I made passing reference to an incredibly insulting, condescending, and completely off-base lecture the Steering Committee of the Charlestown Citizens Alliance posted back in April in response to a “CCA e-mailer” who had the temerity to suggest, as we have several times here on Progressive Charlestown, that there’s more to environmentalism than just open space preservation and that the CCA should embrace green energy projects rather than obstruct them. In true Bizarro Charlestown style, the Steering Committee’s rant doesn’t even respond directly to the points made by the commenter but instead is addressed to several of what CCA’s most prolific blogger, Michael Chambers, has since termed “hobgoblins.”[1]

I found the CCA response so jaw-dropping that I’ve reread it several times, to make sure I didn’t imagine it, and also to make sure that the CCA hasn’t “disappeared” it. Apparently, they don’t even have the grace to be embarrassed by it.

Monday, May 16, 2011

A Guide to the Charlestown Citizens Alliance, Part 1

If you "join" the Charlestown Citizens Alliance (CCA), you will get an occasional e-mail that sometimes carries a little information, such as dry descriptions of recent meetings. But mostly, you will get a compilation of anonymous opinions about hot button issues.

The CCA has the right to address issues whatever way they choice, but I find their approach raises questions.

First, why doesn’t the CCA say where it stands, as an organization, on current issues?

Maybe they might feel no need to state a position. After all, they control Charlestown by owning every member of the Planning Commission. Plus, they have a working majority on the Town Council as long as Lisa DiBello stays aligned with them. So for all practical purposes, the CCA is our shadow government.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Things you’d like to know about the Charlestown Citizens Alliance – but were afraid to ask

2012 Field Guide to Charlestown’s shadow government, Part 1
By Will Collette

Former CCA President and present Town Council
Vice-President Deputy Dan Slattery
It’s time to update our Field Guide to Observing the Charlestown Citizens Alliance (CCA), last updated in October. It’s been almost four years since the CCA took control of Charlestown’s government, riding the crest of the wave of anti-Jim Mageau sentiment.

One of the main things the CCA has proven in its two terms in control of town government is that they are even more adept at stirring up dissension and dividing the community than Jim Mageau ever was.

Unconvinced? Think Whalerock, the Y-Gate Scandal, Ninigret Park and their willingness to give over control of town property to the federal government, Dark Sky Lighting, “Kill Bill,” the Planning Commission’s plutocracy, “the riot of the rich,” disdain for fair taxation, attacks against small business, their hostility to families with children, beach toilets, Deputy Dan Slattery’s jihads and Uncle Fluffy’s gaffes.

By the end of June, we’ll see what the CCA intends to do about extending its reign of mismanagement for another two years when it comes time to announce candidates. But in the meantime, for your campaign season convenience, here are the answers to the CCA questions you’ve been dying to ask.

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Rhode Island Braces for Impending Drought


Click for larger image. (Courtesy of NOAA)
By DAVE FISHER and TIM FAULKNER/ecoRI News staff

PROVIDENCE — The average Rhode Islander enjoyed our milder-than-usual winter. Record high temperatures were logged nearly every week from January through March, and daily temperatures rarely got close to average lows.
The high temperatures and lack of snow were an unexpected savings for municipalities that didn’t have to pay contractors or city/town employees to clear the white stuff from roads and parking lots, or buy road sand.
What a difference a few years make. 

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

CCA re-shuffles the deck chairs

The Charlestown Citizens Alliance sent out an e-mail message today about major changes in its officer ranks.

The message begins by noting how CCA began almost five years ago as an organization "dedicated to open and transparent town government" - and that "it remains so."

So naturally - in complete secrecy - the CCA "Steering Committee refreshes itself, picks new officers, and recruits members for the Steering Committee."

Sunday, October 2, 2011

UPDATED: FAQs about the Charlestown Citizens Alliance

Revised guide to Charlestown’s shadow government
By Will Collette

What is the CCA? That’s the Charlestown Citizens Alliance. It is an unincorporated association started in 2006 now registered with the state as a political action committee. The Board of Elections ruled they were raising money to work on electoral issues. According to their last campaign finance report (filed July 30), they had a cash balance of $2339.46.

Why should anyone care who or what they are? The CCA is Charlestown’s shadow government. They picked each and every member of the Planning Commission. Two of their long-time leaders head the Town Council and, with Lisa DiBello’s vote, hold the majority.


Wednesday, May 25, 2011

FAQs about the Charlestown Citizens Alliance

What is the CCA? That’s the Charlestown Citizens Alliance. It is an unincorporated association started in 2006 now registered with the state as a political action committee. The Board of Elections ruled they were raising money to work on electoral issues.

Why should anyone care who or what they are? Right now, the CCA is Charlestown’s shadow government. They picked each and every member of the Planning Commission. Two of their long-time leaders head the Town Council and, with Lisa DiBello’s vote, hold the majority.

To ignore the CCA is like ignoring the Republican Party’s control over the U.S. House of Representatives, or the Tea Party’s control over the Republican Party. Or the corporate interests that control the Tea Party. To understand power, you don’t just look at the puppets, but at the puppet masters.

Why are the CCA leaders and supporters so sensitive to criticism? That’s a good question and I don’t know the answer. I have a theory that they were traumatized by their experience with Jim Mageau. Maybe when they hear criticism, they think somebody is about to shove a camera at them.

Maybe they’re not feeling enough love for having ousted Mageau in 2008 – and for about the 10th time in writing in Progressive Charlestown, I say thank you for that, but not for the rest of what you have done to this town. 

The CCA functions as Charlestown’s controlling political party. With that power comes heat from those of us who do not agree with their vision or their actions. If they can’t stand the heat, drop out. Go fishing. Go back to Florida. But stop whining.

Sunday, February 6, 2022

The Muddy Genesis of the CCSPAA

Charlestown Citizens/Sachem Passage Alliance Association Emerges From The Mud Hole

By Robert Yarnall

In small towns, it is easy for small decisions and big mistakes, local squabbles and petty rivalries to become the business of everyone. This is the story of how one neighborhood’s disputes can have a major effect on everyone, residents and town employees alike.       

Part 5 Cash Flow Low? Try Quid Pro Quo!

The picture above was taken at the Sachem Passage Association kayak access located on its Oyster Drive property. The fake money was digitally added to contrast with the real money our association has been figuratively tossing into that mudhole for the past 22 years. 

The images below, from left to right, are Belgian block pavers fronting the kayak access; a pull-back view from the small parking area looking toward the kayak access; the kayak rack adjacent to the kayak access; the lone picnic table adjacent to the small parking area.   


These idyllic amenities are the prime features of the Oyster Drive property that interested the Charlestown Town Council and Planning Commission Chair Ruth Platner. The lot itself has been deemed unbuildable by the Town of Charlestown. Why? Wetlands. 

When it became apparent that the coveted recreational features were no longer included in the deal during the SPA’s November 8, 2021, Town Council presentation, Council President Deb Carney and her fellow councilors were less than pleased. 

SPA President Ronald Areglado claimed that the inconsistencies were attributable to his leave of absence from the SPA Board of Directors while he campaigned as the CCA-endorsed candidate for Charlestown Town Moderator. He suggested circumstances would have been more favorable had he been in the loop. 

The Town Council collectively shrugged off Areglado’s disclaimer. Beginning with Council President Carney, each councilor probed different aspects of the proposal. Even with assistance from SPA Attorney Nick Gorham, Mr. Areglado was unable to clear things up. He knew he was in trouble, and it showed. He jokingly offered to give the property away. It wasn’t a good look. 

Planning Commissioner Ruth Platner, de facto leader of the CCA, found herself in an uncomfortable position. Ms. Platner had followed the Oyster Drive property sale for over two years. It was exactly the type of open space acquisition she worshipped, undeveloped land with built-in passive recreational features. 

Ruth Platner was somewhat puzzled by the SPA’s withdrawal of the boat/kayak launch: 

“The boat launch was definitely part of the grant,” Ms. Platner commented, referring to the document package of the formal proposal that was the foundation of the SPA’s sale pitch. 

For those of us watching video of the Nov 8th Town Council Meeting, it seemed Ruth Platner was genuinely taken aback by the SPA’s transparent bait & switch maneuver. 

Referencing Areglado’s earlier assertion that his leave of absence from the SPA Board of Directors was the source of the confusion, Platner offered to make sense of SPA’s double messaging… “…there have been different association heads, I think, so that’s probably why there’s a difference in what they are talking about, compared to what the other people are talking about.” 

Planning Commissioner Platner was necessarily nibbling at the corners, not quite sure what was going on with the Oyster Drive deal. If she knew that CCA Steering Committee member Joe Quadrato had been working on the proposal for nearly two years, including the past nine months in his capacity as SPA Real Estate and Finance designee, she wasn’t about to mention it, certainly not in a public forum. 

Ms. Platner knew that Joseph Quadrato had been a vital cog in the CCA’s political machine for nearly a decade. Quadrato’s natural fundraising prowess, a convenient extension of his professional sales career, earned him a 2014 appointment to the Zoning Board of Review. His sustained performance over the next two election cycles led to a coveted seat on the CCA Steering Committee alongside Zoning Board colleague Cliff Vanover, Platner’s spouse. 

CCA Treasurer Vanover soon learned that Quadrato’s services came with a price tag, in addition to the pair of political plum appointments. Starting with the 2012 election cycle and continuing through the 2020 campaign, Vanover wrote six checks totaling $4,515.32 to Quad Products, Mr. Quadrato’s home-based small business. For the CCA, it must have been worth every penny, even if it came with a whiff of quid pro quo…

It’s likely that neither Mr. Vanover nor Ms. Platner knew that Mr. Quadrato may have had more in mind than a measly handful of Quad Product orders tossed his way in recognition of his contributions to the CCA political fiefdom.

In July of 2020, property owners of Sachem Passage received a newsletter from then-SPA President Paul Raiche. A thirteen-member sub-committee had developed three options in a quest to get rid of an asset that had turned into a liability. 

The group settled on exploring option #2, donating the land to a non-profit conservation group, and kicked its recommendation upstairs to the Board of Directors. 

The SPA Board of Directors consists of SPA officers and SPA directors. In 2020, the SPA officers were also its directors. This meant that President Paul Raiche, VP Joe Quadrato, Secretary Ron Areglado and Treasurer Tom Gilligan were also the Board of Directors. 

Aside from Mr. Raiche, the fate of the Oyster Drive property was now in the hands of Messrs. Areglado, Quadrato and Gilligan, the same SPA power trio that led the SPA proxy, Illwind, the group that dovetailed with the CCA during the entirety of the Whalerock Wind Turbine saga, 2010-2013. 

It was during Whalerock that CCA stalwarts Tom Gentz and Dan Slattery recognized Joe Quadrato’s formidable fundraising skills. Quad Products began showing up in the CCA’s Expenditure Reports. Joe Quadrato meant business. The CCA bought in. 

As Whalerock was playing itself out, Illwind was able to offload its litigation-based financial worries onto the backs of Charlestown’s taxpayers. The CCA-controlled town council spent $50,000 to hire Special Council John Mancini to represent a group of “anonymous abutters.” 

When the town plunked down $2.14 million to buy the 78-acre idyllic not-to-be-Whalerock open space, now the Moraine Preserve, the voluminous pretext associated with Illwind faded from the public discourse. Illwind, the SPA clone, had been bailed out at taxpayer expense, while Charlestown’s CCA-dominated Town Council looked the other way. 

The “anonymous abutters” turned out to every remaining Illwind litigant who had persevered through the 2010-2013 courtroom marathon. There were twenty-nine individuals representing sixteen households. All but two households were SPA members. Every SPA officer and director from 2010-2020 was on the list. 

The Town’s role in Illwind’s bailout cemented a mutualistic relationship between the CCA and the SPA that has lasted for a decade, due primarily to the fundraising skills of Joseph Quadrato. 

Over the next three election cycles, Quadrato maintained his CCA workload while also accepting an appointment to the Zoning Board of Review. By 2019, however, the floundering SPA required his attention as well. He knew what had to be done. He rounded up his Illwind posse and got to it.    

January 2020: SPA Treasurer Tom Gilligan contacts Andolfo Appraisal Associates to commission an appraisal report to establish the fair market value of Lot 95-5, Oyster Drive. The report includes photographs of the property’s waterfront, woodlands, parking area, boat launch, kayak rack, and picnic area. The fair market value is determined to be $426,000, if and only if the wetlands lot is buildable. Unfortunately, it is not. 

April 2020: SPA Secretary Ron Areglado files an Open Space Inquiry with the Town Clerk, leading to interactions with Megan DiPrete, Chief of Planning for RI DEM, Town Manager Mark Stankiewicz, and Town Planner Jane Wideman. Weidman files a $213,000 grant application based on the SPA’s conditional appraisal of $426,000, ignoring Tax Assessor Ken Swain’s definitive, standards-based rationale of the town’s $61,900 fair market value assessment.     

February 2021: The Charlestown Town Council decides that all negotiations pertinent to Oyster Drive Lot 95-5 property will be based on a third-party appraisal by Newport Appraisal Group, listing a fair market value assessment of $75,000. The SPA Board of Directors does not reference the $75,000 third-party appraisal in its February mailing, nor in any other subsequent interactions, with its members. Joseph Quadrato is appointed as Resource for Finance and Real Estate, a position created specifically for him. 

September 2021: CCA Steering Committee member Joseph Quadrato delivers an update on the property sale to thirty-one SPA members attending the September 16th Annual Meeting, among them Charlestown Town Councilor Susan Cooper. Quadrato states bluntly, “… I have two contacts at Town Hall. They have told me that one individual, who I will not name, is not cooperating with us.”

President Ronald Areglado refuses to allow Quadrato’s statement into the official minutes, aware of its political implications. 

November 2021: Newly elected SPA President Ron Areglado hand-delivers the SPA’s Oyster Drive Prospectus in a 90-minute, live-streamed opus during the November 8th Town Council Meeting, and promptly drops the ball. The Town Council lambastes his performance, noting that although the SPA’s asking price remains at $426,000, this newest SPA offering no longer includes the kayak/canoe access, the watercraft rack, or the picnic area. The Councilors’ comments indicate they recognize the bait-and-switch tactic for what it is. SPA Real Estate guru Joseph Quadrato, architect of the proposal, is nowhere to be seen. 

December 2021: President Ronald McDonald Areglado sends a snail mail update referencing the November 8th Town Council Meeting by providing an unlinked ninety-three-character URL address - it must be entered from a keyboard - to access the video of the meeting. “Good luck with that…,” he muses.

Also included in the holiday greeting is a terse mea culpa that the association has neither the expertise nor the money to address the issues raised by the Town Council, ergo “…we voted unanimously to retain the property at this time. We will bring this recommendation to the members at our next Annual Meeting in May 2022.” There is no mention of Resource Person for Real Estate and Finance Joe Quadrato. 

If there was ever a chance that the CCA would again bail out the SPA á la Whalerock, Joe Quadrato killed it by way of his awkward braggadocio referencing his “two contacts at Town Hall,” arguably Town Manager Mark Stankewicz and Town Planner Jane Weidman. 

Implicit in Quadrato’s admission is the discomforting notion that both Stankewicz and Weidman “were cooperating with us,” and that only he, Joe Quadrato, wielded enough influence around town hall, by virtue of his Zoning Board familiarity and CCA Steering Committee status, to extract their “cooperation” for the financial well-being of the SPA. 

During routine business, in his capacity as a Zoning Board Official through June 2021, Quadrato would presumably interact with town officials, especially in Planning (Jane Weidman) and Administration (Mark Stankewicz). What he had to say, and how he said it, is anybody’s – and everybody’s – guess. Especially Ruth Platner. 

Although Charlestown’s rank-and-file employees have workplace protections afforded them by virtue of union representation, administrators and department heads are not part of the bargaining unit.

They are represented by their own “association,” essentially serving at the whim of the decade-long CCA-dominated Town Council. 

Those “whims” are explicitly defined for them by the policy-making priorities of the CCA Steering Committee, which gives Joseph Quadrato top dog billing as its top producing cash cow. 

Apparently, those “whims” don’t include a CCA Courtesy Bailout for the SPA this time around, a mere decade after the Whalerock alliance, Joe Quadrato’s fundraising skills notwithstanding. 

It remains to be seen how Mr. Quadrato will react to the CCA’s thumbs-down. If he was counting on the standard 6% real estate commission, a $426,000 sale would have netted him 25,560 clams. He may just decide to pick up his marbles - what’s left of them - and go home. 

Joseph Quadrato will never admit to the impetuous speech he gave that autumn evening at St. Andrew Lutheran Church. Indeed, his confidante, Ronald Areglado, refused to allow the verbatim text into the official minutes. And John Kaptinski, SPA Archivist, will swear that “If it isn’t in the minutes, it didn’t happen.” 

But for most folks, especially Councilor Susan Cooper, it happened loud and clear. 

The mouse that roared turned out to be the elephant in the room. 

To read the earlier episodes in this series:

For Part 1, click here

For Part 2, click here

For Part 3, click here

For Part 4, click here  

Monday, July 8, 2024

Charlestown Republican chair denounces Charlestown Citizens Alliance “election deception

CCA runs stealth ticket to confuse voters

By Will Collette

I’m not the only one who thinks the Charlestown Citizens Alliance (CCA) has come up with a new trick to continue cheating its way to power in Charlestown. CLICK HERE for my commentary.

Since 2008, the CCA ran its candidates exclusively as “independents.” They disparaged traditional parties and claimed their candidates were the only ones without strings.

They don’t mention that every person running under the CCA banner swears to obey the CCA platform, which changes depending on the whims of campaign donors. If elected, they must follow orders from the secretive CCA Steering Committee, usually conveyed by CCA founder and de facto leader, Charlestown Planning Commissar Ruth Platner.

In 2022, Charlestown voters ousted the CCA and elected a supermajority on the Town Council who were endorsed by Charlestown Residents United (CRU). CRU candidates ran openly under the party affiliations and have governed as a coalition.

In 2024, the CCA decided – without explanation – to toss out its founding principle of nonpartisanship. Most of its Council candidates are running under a party label whether or not they have any real ties to that party. The practical effect is to scramble the ballot, mixing CCA and CRU candidates without differentiation.

The Charlestown Republican Town Committee (CRTC) is also outraged at this decision based on this statement from CRTC Chair Laura Rom:

The CCA deception machine is beginning the campaign season in full swing.

Ruth Platner and Bonnie Van Slyke were registered Democrats until they declared a run on Wednesday for Town Council as "Independent Candidates".

Angela Jalbert was a registered Independent until she declared for Town Council and is now a registered Republican, however the very active Charlestown Republican Town Committee has never heard her name.

All the best to all the Candidates that are willing to make the commitment to help better Charlestown. Let's make this an honest campaign, the voters of Charlestown deserve that from all the candidates.

Laura Rom, Chair Charlestown Republican Town Committee

Ruth Platner responded in Nextdoor.

Ruth Platner

Carolina Back - S County•14h

I have run in non-partisan elections for more than 20 years and have been unaffiliated, namely "Independent". In RI statewide politics most of the real choice is in the primaries. I voted in the governor's office primary in 2022 and probably failed to disaffiliate.

I discovered that this spring and [SIC] you can't disaffiliate close to an election if you are a candidate. I have also voted in Republican primaries. RI has open primaries and unaffiliated voters can vote in either primary.

One of the laws this general assembly passed was to make disaffiliation automatic for unaffiliated voters who vote in primaries. Had the law been in place, I would have automatically been returned to unaffiliated after voting in the primary.

When John Chafee was our US Senator, I was registered as a Republican as his brand of pro-environment politics very closely fit my political view. Claudine Schneider was our congressional representative then, a Republican, and also a strong environmentalist.

Political parties are not one thing, they change, and town political committees don't own the ballot. There are a lot of different ways to be a Republican or a Democrat or an Independent. You should vote for the person and not the party.”

Platner does not address the party affiliation of her faithful servant, Bonnita Van Slyke, nor the other CCA candidates running under party labels even though they never asked for party endorsements. Indeed, the CCA slate carries nobody’s endorsement other the CCA Steering Committee, which means Ruth Platner.

So begins what Republican Chair Laura Rom calls the CCA’s “campaign of deception.”

NOTE: For clarity, I added line breaks to both Rom’s and Platner’s statements rather than run them in one long block of text as published in Nextdoor.