A legislative victory in Connecticut is the first for
American consumers who are demanding the right to know if our food is
genetically engineered.
Do you have a right to
know how your food is produced?
Look at any label on
something made for human consumption. Whether it’s a bite-sized candy bar, a
box of cereal, or a gallon of pickles, you’ll see lots of information: a list
of ingredients, allergen warnings, calorie counts, vitamins, and even whether
that item contains trans-fats.
What won’t you see?
Whether your food was genetically engineered.
But this might change
in the near future. Consumers across the nation are demanding that information.
Connecticut recently became the first state to pass a law requiring the
labeling of genetically engineered foods.
Genetically engineered crops — plants with genes of another species inserted into their DNA — have grown increasingly common in our food supply since their introduction in the mid-1990s. While some organic food suppliers tout the lack of these ingredients, products containing these newfangled things are never labeled. Neither is our genetically modified produce, like sweet corn or papayas.
The
majority of corn, soybeans, and cotton grown in the U.S. are all genetically engineered. And I
dare you to pick up a box or a package of anything in a grocery store and find
cookies, cereal, or even a frozen dinner that contains no corn or soy. Even
your meat, milk, and eggs come from animals fed corn and soy.
Without labels, there’s
one way to avoid consuming genetically engineered foods: Buy
organic.
These “frankenfoods”
have been controversial from the get-go. Some consumers worry whether they’re
safe, some are concerned about their environmental impact, and others fear that
they’ll hurt our farmers. The lack of labeling isn’t due to a lack of consumer
demand for labels.
National labeling
requirements are up to the federal government. And the authorities in charge of
that work assert that genetically engineered foods are “substantially
equivalent” to normal food that has its original DNA intact. With no difference
between the foods, there’s no need for a label.
“If the foods are the
same, then what the heck are they patenting?” asks Nancy Casady, who manages
People’s Food Co-op in San Diego. She’s referring to the fact that each variety
of genetically engineered foods is patented, and farmers who buy them must sign
contracts prohibiting them from saving and replanting their seeds.
The way I see it,
consumers simply have a right to know how their food is produced, whether the
government says the food is “substantially equivalent” or not.
Even some proponents
of genetic engineering are starting to think that labels are a good idea. When
the industry fights hard against labels — often winning — it looks like they’ve
got something to hide. (This is what labeling advocates have said for years. If
these products are so great, why doesn’t Big Ag brag about them?)
Nearly two decades
since the first genetically engineered foods entered the American food supply,
we’re finally getting closer to labeling them.
Other right-to-know
consumer movements have worked hard to pass their own labeling requirements
without winning (yet), including California, Oregon, New
York, Vermont, and Washington.
That’s why it’s such a
big deal that Connecticut‘s measure passed with nearly unanimous
support in both chambers of the state’s legislature. There’s a catch, though.
The law includes two “triggers.”
Four other states must pass labeling laws
before Connecticut’s own law can go into effect. And some of those states must
be in the Northeast.
Why do we have to
fight so hard just to know how our food is produced? Shouldn’t it be our right?
OtherWords columnist Jill
Richardson is the author of Recipe
for America: Why Our Food System Is Broken and What We Can Do to Fix It.
OtherWords.org
