A dozen superintendents in Connecticut issued a manifesto for real reform. It is one that parents and teachers–and students too!–would happily embrace in place of the current stale and test-driven juggernaut that crushes learning and creativity.
They say, in part:
“Our public school landscape is littered
with initiatives, while the vision for learning in Connecticut lacks clarity
and coherence. In this “vision void” our measures (i.e. test scores) have
become our goals, confounding the purpose of schooling and perpetuating yet
another round of piecemeal initiatives.
“The path we should avoid taking is the one that implements the NCLB waiver plan as the de facto vision for the education of Connecticut’s children. Instead we should identify a clear and compelling vision for education in our state and employ all of our resources to achieve it.
"Staying the course of current reform efforts without a deep analysis of the effects in actual classrooms across the state will further cement the system of compliance and “one size fits all” that grips our very diverse school districts like a vise.
“One way to clarify the vision is to
answer the direct and simple questions:
“What are the most worthy outcomes of
our public education system?
“Are we preparing our students for the
world they will enter when they graduate?
“Is our public education system
positioned for continuous improvement, as opposed to ranking, sorting and
punishing?
“To what extent do our laws increase
conformity at the expense of innovation?
“The answers to these questions imply
the need to foster the cognitive, social/emotional and interpersonal student
capacities for work, citizenship and life. Additionally, they demand a deep
analysis of the systemic efforts to continuously improve. Confronting these
questions, and others, will require:
- “A redefinition of the role of testing,
- “An accountability model (mandatory in the NCLB waiver) matched to a clarified vision for 21st Century learning in Connecticut
- “Statewide systems that incentivize innovation and a broad sharing of innovative programs…”
“Districts and teachers are suffocating
from a “one size fits all”, compliance-based approach to schooling. One size
does not fit all in education, no more than it does in medicine, social work or
any other endeavor in which human beings are at the core of the enterprise.
"In an era that rewards and requires innovative thinking to solve complex problems, public schools have endured a stifling of professional autonomy through increased standardization and homogenization. As a result, energy is drained, a passion for teaching and learning evaporates, and many teachers and leaders question the lack of purpose to their work. Some ways to foster innovation include:
"In an era that rewards and requires innovative thinking to solve complex problems, public schools have endured a stifling of professional autonomy through increased standardization and homogenization. As a result, energy is drained, a passion for teaching and learning evaporates, and many teachers and leaders question the lack of purpose to their work. Some ways to foster innovation include:
“Creating a “Districts of Innovation”
program through which the State Department of Education would administer a
rigorous process identifying various district approaches to current challenges
faced by schools, such as, reducing bullying, improving school climate,
evaluating the performance of individual teachers and administrators, etc.
"These districts would apply for a waiver or modification from state requirements in order to innovate their practices, while analyzing the impact. These districts could be required to partner with a university, commit to sharing their results, and, if successful, serve as a provider of professional development for other districts. The incubation of fresh, innovative ideas, by classroom teachers and administrators would exponentially grow the capacity of educators in the state.
"These districts would apply for a waiver or modification from state requirements in order to innovate their practices, while analyzing the impact. These districts could be required to partner with a university, commit to sharing their results, and, if successful, serve as a provider of professional development for other districts. The incubation of fresh, innovative ideas, by classroom teachers and administrators would exponentially grow the capacity of educators in the state.
“Working with Regional Education Service
Centers (RESC) to develop an “expert in residence” program with area districts.
Districts could grant a yearlong sabbatical to individual teachers to share
their innovative work and provide professional development to schools across
the state.
Pairing schools to work across different districts to collaboratively confront professional challenges. These partnerships could foster such promising practices as “lesson study”, peer to peer observations, and collaborative analysis of student work.”
Pairing schools to work across different districts to collaboratively confront professional challenges. These partnerships could foster such promising practices as “lesson study”, peer to peer observations, and collaborative analysis of student work.”
These are but a few of the good ideas,
grounded in experience and research, that these thoughtful superintendents
propose. It is a vision for positive reform that should replace the sterile
strategy of carrots and sticks.
