Trump's only apparent strategy is to enrich himself, his families and his buds
He also loves making people, markets and countries jump whenever he tries out some new idea that pops into his head
![]() |
| Trump's only strategy is self-enrichment |
To anyone paying attention, it should be pretty clear that Donald Trump is clueless about the economy.
Just to take an obvious example to make the point:
Trump has repeatedly promised to lower drug prices by
800, 900, or even 1,500%. As he rightly says, no one thought it was possible.
It wouldn’t be a big deal that he got confused once or twice
and forgot that you can’t lower prices by more than 100%, unless you envision
drug companies paying people to use their drugs. But Trump has done this
repeatedly, over many months.
This tells us two things. First, he really doesn’t have even
a basic understanding of arithmetic and percentages. That would be bad in and
of itself. After all the president is sometimes directly negotiating deals, and
it would be bad if he agreed to something and then had to call back his
negotiating partner and tell them he didn’t understand what he had agreed to.
But the other issue is even more serious. Surely people like
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Kevin Hassett, Trump’s national economic
adviser, understand percentages. But apparently, they are too scared of Trump
to explain how they work. Instead, they let him go out week after week and make
a fool of himself by making nonsensical promises on lowering drug prices.
This fact is crucial if we are trying to assess whether
Trump has a coherent economic strategy. The point is he is obviously confused
about many things when it comes to the economy. He seems to think that other
countries pay tariffs and
send the US checks. He also seems to think that wind and solar power are
very expensive sources of energy. And he seems to think that the economy was
collapsing when he took office.
All of these claims are 180° at odds with reality, but it is extremely unlikely that his aides would be able to correct him on these or other absurd views that Trump seems to hold. Given how out of touch Trump is with reality and the inability of his aides to correct him on anything, why would anyone think that he has a coherent economic strategy?
As many of us have pointed out, even most hardcore free
traders will concede tariffs can serve a useful purpose. They can be used
strategically to build up important industries. This is what Joe Biden tried to
do when he used tariffs, along with subsidies and regulatory changes, to
promote domestic production of advanced computer chips, electric vehicles,
batteries, and wind and solar and other forms of clean energy.
But what is the coherence in a tariff policy when some of
the highest tariffs, like Trump’s 50% tariff on imported steel, are reserved
for intermediate goods that are inputs for other manufacturing industries? How
does it make sense to impose an extra 10 percentage point tariff on imports
from Canada because Trump didn’t like a television ad they ran during the World
Series? And India got
whacked with a tariff of 50% on its exports because its president would not
support Trump’s drive to get a Nobel Peace Prize.
Anyone trying to weave together these and other tariff
decisions by Trump, along with many other economic decisions he has made since
taking office, is really stretching if they think they can find anything
coherent. It is bad for the country and the world that policy in the United States is
being determined by a man child who has no idea what he is doing beyond
stuffing his pockets, but that is the reality.
There may be a market for thoughtful pieces describing the
grand Trump strategy in major intellectual outlets, but that is yet one more
example of market failure. There ain’t nothing there.
Dean Baker is the co-founder and the senior economist of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR). He is the author of several books, including "Getting Back to Full Employment: A Better bargain for Working People," "The End of Loser Liberalism: Making Markets Progressive," "The United States Since 1980," "Social Security: The Phony Crisis" (with Mark Weisbrot), and "The Conservative Nanny State: How the Wealthy Use the Government to Stay Rich and Get Richer." He also has a blog, "Beat the Press," where he discusses the media's coverage of economic issues.
