The hard truth: we simply have to stop producing so much plastic
A report published by Greenpeace exposes the plastics industry as “merchants of myth” still peddling the false promise of recycling as a solution to the global pollution crisis, even as the vast bulk of commonly produced plastics remain unrecyclable.“After decades of meager investments accompanied by
misleading claims and a very well-funded industry public relations campaign
aimed at persuading people that recycling can make plastic use sustainable,
plastic recycling remains a failed enterprise that is economically and
technically unviable and environmentally unjustifiable,” the report begins.
“The latest US government data indicates that just 5% of US
plastic waste is recycled annually, down from a high of 9.5% in 2014,” the
publication continues. “Meanwhile, the amount of single-use plastics produced
every year continues to grow, driving the generation of ever greater amounts of
plastic waste and pollution.”
Among the report’s findings:
- Only a
fifth of the 8.8 million tons of the most commonly produced types of
plastics—found in items like bottles, jugs, food containers, and caps—are
actually recyclable;
- Major
brands like Coca-Cola, Unilever, and Nestlé have been quietly
retracting sustainability commitments
while continuing to rely on single-use plastic packaging; and
- The US
plastic industry is undermining meaningful plastic regulation by making
false claims about the recyclability of their products to avoid bans and
reduce public backlash.
“Recycling is a toxic lie pushed by the plastics industry
that is now being propped up by a pro-plastic narrative emanating from the White House,”
Greenpeace USA oceans campaign
director John Hocevar said in a statement. “These corporations and their partners continue
to sell the public a comforting lie to hide the hard truth: that we
simply have to stop producing so much plastic.”
“Instead of investing in real solutions, they’ve poured
billions into public relations campaigns that keep us hooked on single-use
plastic while our communities, oceans, and bodies pay the price,” he added.
Greenpeace is among the many climate and environmental groups supporting a global plastics treaty, an accord that remains elusive after six rounds of talks due to opposition from the United States, Saudi Arabia, and other nations that produce the petroleum products from which almost all plastics are made.
Honed from decades of funding and promoting dubious research
aimed at casting doubts about the climate crisis caused
by its products, the petrochemical industry has sent a small army of lobbyists
to influence global treaty negotiations.
In addition to environmental and climate harms,
plastics—whose chemicals often leach into the food and water people eat and
drink—are linked to a wide range of health risks, including infertility,
developmental issues, metabolic disorders, and certain cancers.
Plastics also break down into tiny particles found almost
everywhere on Earth—including in human bodies—called microplastics, which cause
ailments such as inflammation, immune dysfunction, and possibly cardiovascular
disease and gut biome imbalance.
A study published earlier
this year in the British medical journal The Lancet estimated
that plastics are responsible for more than $1.5 trillion in health-related
economic losses worldwide annually—impacts that disproportionately affect
low-income and at-risk populations.
As Jo Banner, executive director of the Descendants
Project—a Louisiana advocacy group dedicated to fighting environmental racism in frontline
communities—said in response to the new Greenpeace report, “It’s
the same story everywhere: poor, Black, Brown, and Indigenous communities
turned into sacrifice zones so oil companies and big
brands can keep making money.”
“They call it development—but it’s exploitation, plain and
simple,” Banner added. “There’s nothing acceptable about poisoning our air,
water, and food to sell more throwaway plastic. Our communities are not
sacrifice zones, and we are not disposable people.”
Writing for Time this week, Judith Enck, a
former regional administrator at the US Environmental
Protection Agency and current president of the environmental
justice group Beyond Plastics, said that
“throwing your plastic bottles in the recycling bin may make you feel good
about yourself, or ease your guilt about your climate impact. But recycling
plastic will not address the plastic pollution crisis—and
it is time we stop pretending as such.”
“So what can we do?” Enck continued. “First, companies need
to stop producing so much plastic and shift to reusable and refillable systems.
If reducing packaging or using reusable packaging is not possible, companies
should at least shift to paper, cardboard, glass, or metal.”
“Companies are not going to do this on their own, which is
why policymakers—the officials we elected to protect us—need to require them to
do so,” she added.
Although lawmakers in the 119th US Congress have
introduced a handful of bills aimed at tackling plastic pollution, such
proposals are all but sure to fail given Republican control of both the House
of Representatives and Senate and the Trump administration’s pro-petroleum
policies.
