Will Trump look for ways to use coal to kill wind turbines?
University of Oxford
![]() |
| Trump's 2-for-1 obsession: promote coal, kill green energy |
The new study mapped and assessed more than 140,000 solar PV installations worldwide using satellite data.
By combining this with atmospheric data on air pollution, the researchers calculated how much sunlight is lost and how this reduces electricity generation. They found that aerosols - tiny particles suspended in the air - reduced global solar electricity output by 5.8% in 2023. This is equivalent to 111 terawatt-hours (TWh) of lost energy – the amount generated by 18 medium-sized coal-fired power plants.
Crucially, these losses represent a significant and often overlooked constraint on the clean energy transition.
Between 2017 and 2023, new PV installations added an average of 246.6 TWh of electricity each year, while aerosol-related losses from existing systems reached 74.0 TWh annually - equivalent to nearly one-third of the gains from new capacity. This highlights a previously unrecognized interaction between fossil fuel use and renewable energy, where emissions from one system directly reduce the performance of the other.
To identify the sources of these aerosol-related losses, the researchers traced their origins and found coal-fired power generation to be a major contributor. This effect is particularly evident in China, where solar and coal capacity have expanded in parallel and are often co-located. Regions with high coal capacity aligned closely with areas experiencing the greatest solar PV losses.
China is the world’s largest solar producer, and generated
793.5 TWh of solar PV electricity in 2023 (41.5% of the global total). But it
also experienced the largest losses from aerosols, with total output reduced by
7.7%. The researchers estimate that around 29% of aerosol-related solar PV
losses in China come specifically from coal-fired power plants. Coal plants
emit fine pollution particles that scatter and absorb sunlight, reducing the
amount that reaches nearby solar panels. As a result, the panels generate less
electricity than they otherwise could.
“Air pollution doesn’t just block sunlight - it also changes clouds, which can cut solar power even further. That means the real impact is likely to be bigger than we’ve measured, so we may be overestimating how much solar power can contribute to reducing emissions if we do not get pollution from coal power under control.”
Interestingly, China was found to be the only major region showing a sustained improvement. Aerosol-related solar PV losses declined by an average of 0.96 TWh per year (−1.4% annually) between 2013 and 2023. This is likely due to stricter emission standards and widespread adoption of ultra-low-emission technologies within coal-fired power plants, rather than a reduction in coal capacity itself.
To carry out the analysis, the researchers combined
satellite imagery and machine learning to identify and map more than 140,000
solar installations worldwide. They then integrated these data with atmospheric
observations and a validated solar energy model to estimate how much
electricity each site generates and how much is lost due to air
pollution.
Corresponding author Professor
Jan-Peter Muller (Mullard Space Science Laboratory at UCL) said:
‘Global satellite imaging enabled us to map the inexorable rise of cheap
non-polluting solar power during daylight hours. In the near future, we will be
able to observe the impacts of dust and smoke particles on reducing solar
energy at the Earth’s surface in real-time every 10 minutes from geostationary
satellites spanning the Earth.’
Co-author Dr Chenchen Huang (School of Management, University of
Bath) said: ‘Our findings send a clear warning to the Sustainable Development
Goals: overlooking pollution-induced solar energy losses can lead to a
systematic overestimation of renewable energy output by governments, businesses
and the broader community. To stay on track, policies must account for this
hidden drag and shift fossil-fuel subsidies away from coal.’
Professor
Myles Allen (Department of Physics, University of Oxford, and founder
of Oxford Net Zero, who was not involved in the study) adds: ‘All scenarios
that meet the goals of the Paris Agreement show a rapid transition away from
unabated coal, which isn’t happening. The reason is that coal power is still
remarkably cheap – as this study shows, that’s because the real costs are
hidden.’
The study ‘Coal plants persist as a large barrier to the
global solar energy transition’ will be published in Nature
Sustainability.
An
interactive dashboard developed by Dr Rui Song is available here. This
enables you to explore where solar installations are located, when they were
built and how much energy they generate under real-world atmospheric
conditions.
.webp)