Menu Bar

Home           Calendar           Topics          Just Charlestown          About Us

Sunday, July 12, 2015

In case you missed it: Council meets Monday night

Main items of interest: Toxic Waste and Toxic People
By Will Collette
JoAnn "Shingles" Stolle about to get full seat on Zoning
The Town Council annotated agenda for Monday's meeting was not posted on IQM2 until late Friday so this preview of coming attractions is delayed. 

As most readers may know, the Charlestown Town Council is the second most powerful decision-making body in town. Or maybe the third, since the Planning Commission, under the iron-fist of Planning Commissar Ruth Platner makes more of the actual decisions than the Council does.

But the single most important decision-making body in Charlestown is the Charlestown Citizens Alliance Steering Committee, that merry band of nonpartisan solons, who hold monthly meetings at secret times and secret locations with no public agenda. Just a bunch of public-spirited folks who control all of the key public bodies in Charlestown – the Council, Planning, Zoning and Budget – who get together to decide what will really happen.

They are totally outside of public view and as transparent as a full cesspool. Or a hazardous waste site.



One of the rumored sites for the CCA Steering Committee's secret
meetings. The "Free Hugs" thing is just a diversion. CCA members don't
hug. Or at least, not for free.
But we do get to see the product of their deliberations when the all-CCA Party Town Council holds its meetings and acts on what has already been decided in total secrecy.

To me, one of the most interesting items won’t even be discussed. That’s the re-appointment of CCA Party resident ideologue and Steering Committee member Cliff Vanover to a full term on the Zoning Board of Review that expires in 2020. 

Vanover is one of the most radical members of the CCA, quick to attack and prone to ignore the law when it gets in the way of his “Open Space Uber Alles” or anti-family philosophy. He’s already displayed some unusual behavior on the ZBR, raising issues with appellants that have nothing to do with the law – such as trying to get appellants to agree to install composting toilets.

Cliffie’s reappointment is on the “Consent Agenda,” meaning that it is considered non-controversial (gag) and will be voted on without debate or discussion in a bloc with the array of other supposedly non-controversial items. They're all marked "CA" on the official agenda, below.

Actually, it’s just as well that Cliffie is on the ZBR where his radical views and disregard for the law are on full display, rather than the more stealthy role he has played since the CCA Party’s launch in 2006. 

JoAnn “Shingles” Stolle is also up for an appointment as a full ZBR member until 2018. Stolle’s claim to fame was working to stall construction of the Blue Shutters Beach pavilion until there was a complete review of the types and colors of shingles that were to be used on the roof.

Three other items on the agenda caught my eye, two relating to Ninigret Park. The first of those is a plan to pay for Faith LaBossiere’s bike path about the Park with money drawn from the Ninigret Park Fund, not the recently approved Recreation Bond. There is a snarky, unsigned note in the agenda package that says this approach is preferable to continuing to argue whether or not the bike path is an appropriate use of the bond funding (which is a pretty bald-faced misrepresentation of the argument, but whatever).

Not toxic waste - it's "virgin petroleum"

The second Ninigret item is a rather detailed item with several documents attached regarding what is repeatedly described in the agenda materials as the presence of an amount of “virgin petroleum” (also known as petroleum naphtha) which is deemed by the memo authors as “non-hazardous.” The focal point of concern over this allegedly virgin, non-hazardous material is a location called “Site 8” in Ninigret Park where there were five leaking underground fuel tanks, each holding 25,000 gallons! See maps.


Unknown: how much left in those old tanks when the Navy left, how much leaked into the ground and how much is left. But don't worry, it's just non-hazardous virgin petroleum. You can sprinkle it on your oatmeal.









I spent a lot of years working on community hazardous waste problems, and I know bullshit when I see it, and in particular military bullshit. In 1986, I was awarded the “Uncensored” award for being one of the first to publicize the prevalence of hazardous waste on just every military installation. In 1988, I wrote a manual called “Dealing with Military Toxics” and that same year, I was hired by DOD to teach a workshop in how to deal with the public on military hazardous waste problem to military environmental officers.


This Army Corps of Engineers map defined known contaminated areas more specifically

The Ninigret Navy Auxiliary Airfield (NAAF), like just about every other military installation, was contaminated by fuel, solvents, explosives, old transformers and the like that were simply dumped in pits. Up until the 1970s, that’s what most industries did, so the military was simply following the norm during World War II and right up until it was decommissioned.

When Charlestown took ownership of Ninigret Park, a town ad hoc commission was set up to look at the potential hazards on site. The Commission was headed up by none other than the CCA Party’s current President, Virginia Wooten. They apparently only met once and left no records on the town website. Apparently, Virginia and her colleagues saw no cause for alarm.

Well, Virginia, not exactly. The issue described in the agenda materials for this Council meeting describe old, leaking underground storage tanks that were filed with aviation fuel – that’s the so-called “virgin petroleum” that is supposedly “non-hazardous.”

Since this “virgin petroleum” and “non-hazardous” stuff made no sense to me, I did a little research and discovered there is a peculiarity in the Rhode Island General Laws that classifies “virgin petroleum” as “non-hazardous,” so if you can get your toxic waste classified as “virgin petroleum,” you can skate on the usual environmental standards.

There is a case pending before the RI Supreme Court on exactly this subject. More details HERE. This Council discussion may be an attempt to get out ahead of any likely Court ruling since you can never count on the RI Supremes to take logical positions in their rulings.

If you look through the documents, it seems that Charlestown is about to sign off on an agreement that plays along with the farce that dumped aviation fuel is "non-hazardous" except that nobody should go digging around the area. And the farce that all those thousands of gallons of oil and fuel spilled into the ground over the past 60+ years have been all safely cleaned and contained. And the farce that no more groundwater monitoring needs to be done.

Why not wait until the RI Supremes decide the case? Why sign a document that holds absolutely no self-interest for Charlestown or its citizens, but rather lets the DOD and DEM off the hook?

Boosting business by cutting taxes for business by $40.62

According to the CCA Party business geniuses, a tax break of $40.62
will  "make it easier for businesses and entrepreneurs to prosper
in Charlestown"
That's a direct quote.
The third item of interest up for discussion on the agenda is another unsigned memo and proposal for a cut to the town’s business license fee – from the current $25 to $10 – and an exemption of the first $10,000 of inventory valuation from town taxation. 

This proposal bears a twisted resemblance to the Homestead Tax Exemption idea that town Democrats proposed in December 2011. At that time, the CCA Party and the RI Statewide Coalition eviscerated the proposal, saying it was unfair to non-residents that year-round Charlestown residents should get a tax break.

Now the CCA Party thinks it’s time to try to give Charlestown businesses a break, but they want to do it in the cheapest, least effective way possible. While I don’t dispute that some small businesses will benefit, the total amount the CCA Party seems willing to invest is $13,000. That’s the amount of tax revenue Tax Assessor Ken Swain estimates the town will lose by granting this exemption. 

According to the memo in the agenda packet, there are 320 registered business owners in Charlestown, so if you spread that $13,000 among them, the average tax break would be $40.62 each.

Now how is that going to change Charlestown’s anti-business reputation? Incidentally, that reputation recently took another hit on page one of the Westerly Sun – click here.

I’ve offered several tangible, practical ideas for ways Charlestown can improve the town’s economy and boost business and employment. CLICK HERE for the details. But, yeah, let's see what $40.62 will do to reduce our unemployment rate.

Here is a cut-and-paste of the actual agenda including links to agenda materials. My usual snide remarks are in bold red.


Charlestown Town Council
Regular Meeting
7/13/2015 7:00 PM
Council Chambers
Town Hall   4540 South County Trail   Charlestown, RI 02813
Downloads:
 Agenda             Agenda Packet 
CALL TO ORDER, Moment of Silence, Pledge of Allegiance
ROLL CALL
Roll Call
PROCLAMATIONS
document
a.
NOTE: this is actually quite old news. Thanks to hard work by Building Official Joe Warner and other Town Hall staff, Charlestown has met the standards set by FEMA for storm emergency preparedness and scored the best level of any municipality in the state, a level 7. This means that property owners along the shore will qualify for a 15% discount on their federal flood insurance. There was much rejoicing over this in Quonnie.
document
a.
PUBLIC COMMENT for items not on the Agenda
COUNCIL COMMENTS
ADMINISTRATOR and COMMISSION REPORTS
document
B. Commission Reports
ANNOUNCEMENTS
document
a.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
document
a.
FISCAL MATTERS
document
a.
b.
c.
document
a.
document
a.
document
a.
b.
document
a.
b.
COUNCIL SITTING AS BEVERAGE LICENSING BOARD
Motion to sit as the Beverage Licensing Board
document
a.
Motion to open the public hearing
Motion to close the public hearing
Motion to grant Frosty Drew Nature Center for a Class F Liquor License, fee to be waived, for the Night Under the Stars event to be held at Ninigret Park on July 25, 2015 from 5:30 p.m. until 8:30 p.m. subject to receipt of all required paperwork and all stipulations and rules and regulations as required by the Liquor Control Administration and the Town Council
document
a.
Motion to open the public hearing
Motion to close the public hearing
Motion to grant St. James Chapel for a Class F Liquor License, fee to be waived, for the Lobster Bake event to be held at 2079 Matunuck Schoolhouse Road on July 26, 2015 – alcohol served from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., subject to receipt of all required paperwork and all stipulations and rules and regulations as required by the Liquor Control Administration and the Town Council
Motion to adjourn as the Beverage Licensing Board.
OLD BUSINESS
document
a.
NOTE: this item is a proposed resolution for an unexpected fight between the CCA Party and the folks who won voters’ support for a $1 million bond measure to carry out the long-delayed improvements to Ninigret Park called for in the Ninigret Park Master Plan.

The argument was over whether the bike path being pushed by one of the CCA Party founders Faith LaBossiere was in the Master Plan or even needed. The argument devolved into who said what during the run-up to the June 1 town financial election.
This bit of unsigned snark was included in the meeting agenda packet:

Although two leading members of the Parks & Recreation Commission promoted funding of the bike path to gain voter approval of the Ninigret bond initiative, the Parks and Recreation Commission subsequently declined to issue an advisory to the Town Council on the funding source. Rather than enter into a distracting, and perhaps premature, debate over the appropriate use of the voter-approved Ninigret bond funds, I move that the Town Administrator be authorized to appropriate the necessary financing of the bike path from the Ninigret Park Fund




b.
NEW BUSINESS
document
a.
b.
c.
d.
document
a.
document
document
CONSENT AGENDA
Motion to accept, approve and place on file the following as the consent agenda: "CA" A - "CA" K
document
document
a.
document
a.
document
a.
document
document
a.
b.
document
a.
b.
document
a.
document
a.
document
document
a.
b.
document
a.
b.
document
a.
b.
document
a.
document
a.
b.
document
a.
b.
c.
document
a.
b.
c.
document
a.
document
a.
b.
document
a.
document
a.
b.
c.
ADJOURNMENT