Thursday, June 26, 2025
Butler Hospital strike deemed lockout while Rhode Island Hospital, Hasbro nurses weigh walkout
State deems Butler has "locked out" union workers, making strikers eligible for unemployment benefits
By Alexander Castro, Rhode Island Current
As a June heatwave scorches through Rhode Island, labor tensions threaten to boil over in the state’s health care sector.
Unionized nurses at Rhode Island Hospital and Hasbro Children’s Hospital voted Monday night to authorize a potential strike, while medical and support staff at Butler Hospital, off the job since May 15, were formally deemed locked out by the state’s labor department on Tuesday, making them eligible for unemployment benefits.
“We are feeling strong and unstoppable — now management’s only option is to sit down with us and come to a fair and equitable agreement for everyone,” Joe Maini, a mental health worker at Butler and member of the bargaining committee, said in a Tuesday night statement.
The United Nurses and Allied Professionals (UNAP) Local 5098 represents roughly 2,500 nurses, case managers and technical and support staff who work at Rhode Island Hospital and Hasbro Children’s Hospital, both in Providence. SEIU 1199NE represents the 800-strong Butler workforce which comprises the nursing, clerical, dietary, technical and mental health staff at the Providence psychiatric hospital.
Both unions’ contracts expired on March 31, and both will have the chance to hash things out again with their employers.
On Wednesday, Butler workers and owner Care New England returned to the bargaining table after two days of bargaining last week proved fruitless.
Myth-busting study shows controversial seed oils reduce inflammation
Big surprise: Bobby Jr. was wrong to condemn seed oils as "poison" and promote beef tallow and lard
American Society for Nutrition

New research that used blood markers to measure linoleic
acid levels and their relation to cardiometabolic risk adds evidence that this
omega-6 fatty acid may help to lower risks for heart disease and type 2
diabetes. The findings challenge claims that seed oils are harmful to
cardiometabolic health.
Linoleic acid, which is found in vegetable oils --
especially seed oils like soybean and corn oil -- and plant foods, is the
primary omega-6 fatty acid consumed in the diet.
"There has been increasing attention on seed oils, with some claiming these oils promote inflammation and raise cardiometabolic risk," said Kevin C. Maki, Ph.D., adjunct professor at the Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington and chief scientist at Midwest Biomedical Research.
"Our study, based on almost 1,900 people, found that
higher linoleic acid in blood plasma was associated with lower levels of
biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk, including those related to inflammation."
Maki presented the findings at NUTRITION 2025, the flagship
annual meeting of the American Society for Nutrition held in Orlando, Florida.
The new results are consistent with those from observational
studies that have shown higher intake of linoleic acid to be associated with
lower risks for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular events, such as heart
attacks and strokes.
An awful substitution: putting children into jobs formerly held by deported immigrants
Let’s Get Child Labor Off Our Dinner Plates
By Todd Larsen, Charlotte Tate
When deciding what to make for dinner, many of us think about how to balance making something affordable, delicious, and healthy. And we might consider ethical questions, like whether our food is locally sourced, our meat is humanely raised, or our meals have a low climate impact..We probably don’t wonder whether child labor is involved.
But unfortunately, that’s
increasingly likely. In recent years, federal investigations have uncovered
children working in dangerous conditions to create the food we eat.
Tyson, Perdue, Cargill, and JBS have all been found to have
children working in slaughterhouses. Many of these children
are immigrants who are unlikely to speak up when they’re in danger.
They need these jobs to survive, but the jobs put their lives at risk.
Children all over the country, some as young
as 10, are working in agriculture, restaurants, and meatpacking.
There are an estimated 300,000-500,000 children
working in agriculture alone.
Their jobs can be dangerous — kids often go to school with
burns from restaurant stoves or cleaning chemicals. In the last two years, at
least three children have died on the job.
Fueling this rise are politicians attempting to roll back
child labor restrictions. They insist that children will benefit from these
“opportunities to work.”
But child
labor involves work that’s harmful
to children’s development and health — like cleaning dangerous
machinery in a slaughterhouse overnight, or being exposed to hazardous
chemicals. Other kids may simply work so many hours that they fall behind in
school and drop out.
Child labor puts an additional strain on local health care,
education, and social services when kids who are injured or fail to keep up at
school. It also harms the labor market by depressing wages — and puts
businesses that actually abide by labor laws or ethical standards at a
competitive disadvantage.
Some federal and state laws, such as federal
“youth wage laws,” even allow businesses to pay children and teenagers
less than adult wages for the first 90 days of employment. This lets companies
increase their bottom line at the expense of children and their communities.
Under the Biden administration, the Department of
Labor issued
multi-million-dollar fines and carried out investigations that were
widely covered in the media, which served as a deterrent. But it remains
unclear if the Trump administration will follow suit.
States are also backsliding. Many are lowering the ages that
children can work in unsafe jobs and increasing the hours they can work.
According to the Economic Policy Institute, 31 states have
introduced bills to weaken child labor protections in recent years.
Wednesday, June 25, 2025
General Assembly gives Charlestown authorization to create a Homestead Tax break
Goes to Governor for signature
By Will Collette
This bill gives the Charlestown Town Council the authority
to craft an ordinance so those of us who make Charlestown our home can get a break
on our property taxes in what’s called a “Homestead Exemption.” The
legislation allows the town to exempt up to 10% of your assessed value.
For a house assessed at $500,000, that would knock the
assessment down by $50,000. At the anticipated July 1 tax rate of $5.93, that
would save around $300.
Many coastal communities offer permanent residents this tax
break because we pay year-round for an infrastructure that can accommodate
absentee landowners and other summer people.
Summer people also take their toll on our nerves through
increased traffic, trash and noise. Other than their taxes, they contribute
little to Charlestown’s economy other than the occasional meal at our few local
restaurants and grocery shopping at Rippy’s and the Mini-Super.
Out of state landowners have been buying up Charlestown
beach properties at unheard prices. Most recently, 18
Ninigret Avenue just sold for $5.5 million to a buyer who lives on Park
Avenue in Manhattan. They paid more than $2.2 million above the home’s assessed
value of $3,292,600.
So far this year, almost a dozen posh homes have sold to non-residents
all at premium prices well over their assessed value. While none match the $2.2
million premium paid for 18 Ninigret Avenue, all but two of the other
high-rollers paid more than $350,000 above assessed value. In second place
after Ninigret Avenue are the Massachusetts buyers of 14 Highland Road who paid
$718,900 above assessed value.
These folks seem to have money to burn.
Here’s the complete list of $1 million+ Charlestown sales in
2025 from our Tax
Assessor’s office. Note that Starett Road is a duplicate entry:
![]() |
Eight buyers live in Massachusetts and Connecticut (4 each). New York, New Jersey and Florida each had one. |
During the years the Charlestown Citizens Alliance (CCA) ruled Charlestown, they stifled any notion of giving local homeowners any tax break that would come at the expense of non-resident landowners.
The issue crested in December 2011 and ended in what I
dubbed “The Riot of the Rich.” Town Hall was packed with rich
non-residents, CCA devotees, right-wing nuts like Jim Mageau and Harry Staley
and a few sadly misinformed locals who denounced the Charlestown Democratic
Committee proposal for a Homestead Tax Credit as the opening salvo in a class
war.
It was unfair to the wealthy, they said, and claimed that raising their taxes would drive them to move out, make them boycott local businesses and not give to local charities. They said all this with a straight face.
Since absentee landowners provide a substantial portion of the CCA’s election fund, there was no way the CCA leadership would support the idea. They stomped the homestead credit to death for the duration of their reign.
Then the CCA was finally beaten by
Charlestown Residents United (CRU) in 2022 and in 2024 when an all-CRU Town
Council slate was elected. That made it safe to talk about issues banned by the CCA.
The Council is currently chaired by Deb Carney (D) who was
one of the few brave voices to speak out for the homestead credit in 2011. It
was after her Council resolution that state Representative Tina Spears (D) introduced a
bill modelled on the recently passed South Kingstown legislation.
Here’s the official timeline for the bill’s quick passage:
House Bill No. 6247
BY Tina Spears
ENTITLED, AN ACT RELATING TO TAXATION -- LEVY
AND ASSESSMENT OF LOCAL TAXES (Grants the town council of the town of
Charlestown the authority to enact a homestead exemption ordinance.)
04/23/2025 Introduced, referred to House Municipal
Government & Housing
04/25/2025 Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (05/01/2025)
05/01/2025 Committee recommended measure be held for further
study
06/06/2025 Scheduled for consideration (06/10/2025)
06/10/2025 Committee recommends passage
06/13/2025 Placed on House Calendar (06/16/2025)
06/16/2025 House read and passed
06/16/2025 Placed on the Senate Consent Calendar (06/18/2025)
06/18/2025 Senate passed in concurrence
06/18/2025 Transmitted to Governor
Once McKee signs, the action shifts back to the Town Council who must craft and present a new ordinance for public hearing. They will need to decide whether to do it (and I hope they will) and if so, at what percentage of assessed value. If they act quickly, we could have an ordinance in place when the legislation kicks in on December 31, plenty of time for applying the exemption to next year's tax bills.
The legislation details what properties are eligible.
Here’s the text of the bill:
AN ACT RELATING TO TAXATION -- LEVY AND ASSESSMENT OF
LOCAL TAXES
Introduced By: Representative Tina L. Spears
Date Introduced: April 23, 2025
Referred To: House Municipal Government & Housing
It is enacted by the General Assembly as follows:
SECTION 1. Chapter 44-5 of the General Laws entitled
"Levy and Assessment of Local Taxes" is hereby amended by adding
thereto the following section:
44-5-89. Charlestown homestead exemption.
(a) The town council of the town of Charlestown is
authorized to annually fix the amount, if any, of a homestead exemption, with
respect to assessed value, from local taxation on taxable real property used
for residential purposes or mixed purposes, defined as a combination of
residential and commercial uses, in the town of Charlestown, and to grant
homestead exemptions to the owner, or owners, of residential real estate, or
combination residential and commercial real estate, in an amount not to exceed ten
percent (10%) of the assessed value. The exemption shall apply to property used
exclusively for residential purposes, and improved with a dwelling containing
less than five (5) units, or real property used for a combination of
residential and commercial uses. When real property is used for mixed purposes,
the percentage of the assessed value shall be a prorated amount. The prorated
amount shall be the percentage of square feet of the parcel used for
residential purposes, multiplied by the percentage of the homestead exemption.
In order to determine compliance with the homestead exemption as outlined in
this section, the town council shall provide, by resolution or ordinance, rules
and regulations governing eligibility for the exemption established by this section.
(b) In the event property granted an exemption under this
section is sold or transferred during the year for which the exemption is
claimed, the town council of the town of Charlestown, 19 1 upon approval of the
town council, may provide for a proration of the homestead exemption in 2 3 4
cases where title to property passes from those not entitled to claim an
exemption to those who are entitled to claim an exemption.
SECTION 2. This act shall take effect on December 31,
2025.
How does coffee affect a sleeping brain?
It's actually helpful
University of Montreal
Coffee can help you stay awake. But what does caffeine actually do to your brain once you're asleep? Using AI, a team of researchers has an answer: it affects the brain's 'criticality'.
Caffeine is not only found in coffee, but also in tea,
chocolate, energy drinks and many soft drinks, making it one of the most widely
consumed psychoactive substances in the world.
In a study published in April in Nature
Communications Biology, a team of researchers from Université de Montréal
shed new light on how caffeine can modify sleep and influence the brain's
recovery -- both physical and cognitive -- overnight.
The research was led by Philipp Thölke, a research trainee
at UdeM's Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience Laboratory (CoCo Lab), and
co-led by the lab's director Karim Jerbi, a psychology professor and researcher
at Mila -- Quebec AI Institute.
Working with sleep-and-aging psychology professor Julie
Carrier and her team at UdeM's Centre for Advanced Research in Sleep Medicine,
the scientists used AI and electroencephalography (EEG) to study caffeine's
effect on sleep.
They showed for the first time that caffeine increases the
complexity of brain signals and enhances brain "criticality" during
sleep. Interestingly, this was more pronounced in younger adults.
"Criticality describes a state of the brain that is
balanced between order and chaos," said Jerbi. "It's like an
orchestra: too quiet and nothing happens, too chaotic and there's cacophony.
Criticality is the happy medium where brain activity is both organized and
flexible. In this state, the brain functions optimally: it can process
information efficiently, adapt quickly, learn and make decisions with
agility."
Added Carrier: "Caffeine stimulates the brain and
pushes it into a state of criticality, where it is more awake, alert and
reactive While this is useful during the day for concentration, this state
could interfere with rest at night: the brain would neither relax nor recover
properly."
40 adults studied
To study how caffeine affects the sleeping brain, Carrier's
team recorded the nocturnal brain activity of 40 healthy adults using an
electroencephalogram. They compared each participant's brain activity on two
separate nights -- one when they consumed caffeine capsules three hours and
then one hour before bedtime, and another when they took a placebo at the same
times.
"We used advanced statistical analysis and artificial
intelligence to identify subtle changes in neuronal activity," said
Thölke, the study's first author. "The results showed that caffeine
increased the complexity of brain signals, reflecting more dynamic and less
predictable neuronal activity, especially during the non-rapid eye movement
(NREM) phase of sleep that's crucial for memory consolidation and cognitive
recovery."
The researchers also discovered striking changes in the
brain's electrical rhythms during sleep: caffeine attenuated slower
oscillations such as theta and alpha waves -- generally associated with deep,
restorative sleep -- and stimulated beta wave activity, which is more common
during wakefulness and mental engagement.
"These changes suggest that even during sleep, the
brain remains in a more activated, less restorative state under the influence
of caffeine," says Jerbi, who also holds the Canada Research Chair in
Computational Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroimaging. "This change in the
brain's rhythmic activity may help explain why caffeine affects the efficiency
with which the brain recovers during the night, with potential consequences for
memory processing."
People in their 20s more affected
The study also showed that the effects of caffeine on brain
dynamics were significantly more pronounced in young adults between ages 20 and
27 compared to middle-aged participants aged 41 to 58, especially during REM
sleep, the phase associated with dreaming.
Young adults showed a greater response to caffeine, likely
due to a higher density of adenosine receptors in their brains. Adenosine is a
molecule that gradually accumulates in the brain throughout the day, causing a
feeling of fatigue.
"Adenosine receptors naturally decrease with age,
reducing caffeine's ability to block them and improve brain complexity, which
may partly explain the reduced effect of caffeine observed in middle-aged
participants," Carrier said.
And these age-related differences suggest that younger
brains may be more susceptible to the stimulant effects of caffeine. Given
caffeine's widespread use around the world, especially as a daily remedy for
fatigue, the researchers stress the importance of understanding its complex
effects on brain activity across different age groups and health conditions.
They add that further research is needed to clarify how
these neural changes affect cognitive health and daily functioning, and to
potentially guide personalized recommendations for caffeine intake.
Materials provided by University of Montreal. Note:
Content may be edited for style and length.
Save Public Radio and Television!
From a press release:
Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha co-led
a coalition of 21 attorneys general in filing an amicus brief in support of two
lawsuits brought by National Public Radio (NPR) and
the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) that seek to
block proposed funding cuts to their organizations and local affiliates.
“Make no mistake: when the Trump Administration attacks
NPR and PBS, they are attempting to severely limit the public’s right to
receive critical information,” said Attorney General Neronha. “NPR and PBS are
American institutions responsible for delivering emergency information,
educational programming, and reliable news, all of which Americans use to
inform how they live their lives. These massive cuts would have dramatically
negative impacts on the flow of public information, especially in rural and
tribal areas, with potentially life-threatening consequences. We must fight to
protect every American’s ability to access information, regardless of income
level or zip code. We must fight to protect our public stations.”
At issue in the case is an executive order signed by
President Trump on May 1 directing the board of the Corporation for
Public Broadcasting and executive branch agencies to end federal
funding for NPR and PBS. On May 27, NPR and three Colorado public radio
stations—Colorado Public Radio, Aspen Public Radio, and
tribal-serving KSUT in southwestern Colorado—sued to block the
proposed cuts. PBS and a Minnesota-based affiliate filed a separate lawsuit on
May 30.
The coalition of attorneys general, led by those from Rhode Island, Colorado, Arizona, and Minnesota, argues that public broadcast stations serve a critical role in delivering information to the public, and the proposed cuts would severely harm Americans.
Tuesday, June 24, 2025
Democratic South County women win passage of lots of good legislation
General Assembly powerhouses
By Will Collette
In case you haven’t noticed it, most of South County’s
General Assembly members are Democratic women. Among the few exceptions are
Charlestown-connected Rep. Bob Craven of No. Kingstown, one of the body’s most
powerful members, and two Westerly DINOcrats, Sen. Sam Azzinaro and Rep. Brian
Patrick Kennedy. Thank you Tina and Victoria
Then there’s MAGA outlier Sen. Elaine Morgan (R) whose
contribution this session has consisted of embarrassing MAGA stunts including one where she impersonated a DOGE agent to try to get into a homelessness
program in Providence.
The dominance of South County’s Democratic women shows in
their remarkable output of significant legislation and, this year in particular,
their ability to get these bills passed.
Now that this year’s General Assembly has closed, my inbox
is filled with notices of bills passed. Sponsors of these bills include
Charlestown’s Senator Victoria Gu and Tina Spears, South Kingstown’s Rep. Carol
Hagan McEntee, Sen. Sue Sosnowski, Reps. Teresa Tanzi and Kathy Fogarty, and
Sen. Alana DiMario.
Today’s roundup only includes bills passed at the end of the
session, not the bills passed earlier. I’ve usually posted notices about those
bills as they happened.
Rep. Megan Cotter (Richmond, Hopkinton, Exeter) scored her
impressive achievements on bills to protect lives, land and homes in the past
few weeks.
The greatest achievements are in the areas of affordable
housing, land use and health care.
I congratulate them all. Trying to get anything done in the
General Assembly is hard and often disappointing work but they can all take
pride in their ability to get things done to benefit South County and the rest
of Rhode Island.
Below, I’ve pasted in the reports on the bills that passed at the session’s close.
July 9 program in Charlestown on well water quality
Safe well water? Test to be sure
In Rhode Island, private well owners are responsible for testing and maintaining the quality of their own well water.
To provide residents with information on private well water testing, treatment, and maintenance, water quality expert Alyson McCann with the University of Rhode Island’s Cooperative Extension Water Quality Program will hold a free program on Wednesday, July 9, from 6 to 7 p.m. at the Cross’ Mills Public Library, 4417 Old Post Road, in Charlestown.
This program is held in partnership with the Charlestown Conservation Commission and the Cross’ Mills Public Library.