Progressive Charlestown
a fresh, sharp look at news, life and politics in Charlestown, Rhode Island
Saturday, September 26, 2026
New website developed by URI researchers illustrates impact of nor’easters and hurricanes over decades
More than 60 years of beach survey data reveal extent of shoreline erosion
| URI GSO students Emily Hall (left) and Dasan McElroy get ready for another beach survey in December 2022. Hall and McElroy earned their master’s degrees in oceanography in 2023 and 2024 respectively. Hall is now a coastal geologist for the Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council. |
The University of Rhode
Island has made one of the world’s oldest and continuous beach survey efforts
available online via Rhode
Island Beach Dynamics Over Decades, a new public website.
Since 1962, about four dozen students and several
scientists from the URI Graduate School of Oceanography (GSO), the URI Environmental Data Center, the URI Department of Geosciences, and Eastern
Connecticut State University have monitored the shorelines of eight
Rhode Island beaches, collecting measurements and images that reveal short- and
long-term changes and the impact of severe storms.
This website took a year and a half to develop. The project
was funded through a grant from the Rhode Island Executive Climate Change Coordinating Council (EC4).
“I’m thrilled to have this website published, not only because we put in a lot of hard work to make it—but also because students and staff have been braving the elements and other challenges for decades,” said J.P. Walsh, URI professor of oceanography, marine geology, and geophysics. “It’s great to have this information compiled for all to see and use.”
Walsh spearheaded the website with Mary Klimasewiski, a
marine research associate in GSO.
“We’re excited to bring decades of beach survey data
together in a publicly accessible resource, making it easier for managers,
researchers, and the public to visualize and understand how our coastline is
changing over time,” said Klimasewiski.
Study links soaring health care spending to higher insurance premiums
Stating the obvious
By Mike Cummings, Yale University
Edited by Sadie Harley,
reviewed by Andrew
Zinin
Growth in health care spending in the United States is driving increases in health insurance premiums, limiting people's access to care and contributing to wage reductions, job losses and rising inequality, according to a new study co-authored by Yale economist Zack Cooper.
The study—an analysis of state-level data on insurance
premiums, health spending and insurer markups from 2011 to 2024—found that
rising spending accounted for 91% of the growth in premiums during the period
covered.
The finding suggests that measures to slow increases in
health insurance premiums should focus on reining in the growth of health care
spending, said Cooper, who directs the Health Care Affordability Lab at Yale.
"Insurance premiums are rising rapidly, putting an
immense amount of pressure on people across the country," said Cooper, an
associate professor of health policy at the Yale School of Public Health and of
economics in Yale's Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
"Our work shows that growth in premiums is being driven
by growth in health care spending. This means that efforts to address the high
cost of insurance premiums require thinking about how to make health care
spending more affordable."
The study was published in the journal JAMA Health Forum. Stuart V. Craig of
the University of Wisconsin-Madison is the study's co-author.
Trump finally releases federal disaster relief for farmers for weather losses in 2023 and 2024
Nearly $15M in Disaster Relief Available for RI Farmers
The Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (DEM) will make nearly $15M in disaster relief assistance available to eligible RI farmers and agricultural producers affected by weather events in 2023 and 2024.
DEM’s Rhode Island Disaster Relief
Program (RIDRP) will distribute $14,944,632.43 from the USDA Farm
Service Agency under the Disaster Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of
2025, to help cover agricultural losses that were not covered by other USDA
disaster programs. That Act included $220 million specifically allocated to New
England, Hawaii and Alaska for eligible losses including market loss, future
economic loss, poultry loss, timber, farm infrastructure, and other
agricultural damage.
Applications are expected to open the first week of October 2026. Technical assistance will be available to help producers understand program requirements and complete their applications. Check https://dem.ri.gov/ri-disaster-relief for updates and timely announcements.
Friday, September 25, 2026
Where the Hell Is the Oil Money Trump Stole From the People of Venezuela?
Trump refuses to say.
Thom Hartmann in Common Dreams

Bessent agreed with Trump, saying
the oil and oil money we’ve seized from that country is “one of the largest
assets to ever go on the U.S. balance sheet.” Billions and billions of dollars.
So Casten asked him a simple question: Can you tell us who
controls that money and where it is? Can you confirm “whether or not
those [funds] are flowing to U.S. persons?”
Bessent’s answer
was a shocking single word: “No.” He ain’t talkin…
Did Trump take the oil and the money from the oil? Bessent
refuses to say. Trump refuses to say. Nobody, in fact, in the Trump regime will
tell us where that money is or who controls it or even who’s making the money
accrued on its interest.
Here’s what we do know:
Three days after Trump kidnapped President Maduro and his
wife, he went on his Nazi-infested social media site and wrote that Venezuela’s oil revenues would be controlled by
him personally “as President of the United States.”
Three days after that, he signed an executive order
declaring a “national emergency” involving that oil so no court or
creditor could touch the money, screwing the bondholders and oil companies to
which Venezuela owed
roughly $150 billion.
Then Trump started selling the oil we’d seized from
Venezuela. The first load, according to Reuters and Semafor, went to commodity
trading companies Vitol and Trafigura for about $500 million, groups that the Washington Post
said both carry histories of bribery schemes tied to oil sales.
And that money didn’t go to the Treasury account that was
described in Trump’s own executive order. Instead, it went to a bank account in Qatar, right after that country’s leaders
gave him a $400 million jet. A senior official explained to Semafor that Qatar was chosen as a
“neutral location” where money “can flow freely” without risk of seizure.
Senator Elizabeth Warren
was outraged, and told the world what most of us were thinking at the time:
“There is no basis in law for a president to set up an
offshore account that he controls so that he can sell assets seized by the
American military. That is precisely a move that a corrupt politician would be
attracted to.”
In January, Secretary of State Marco Rubio testified
to the Senate that $300 million had been sent to Venezuela to cover government
payroll needs and another $200 million was “still sitting” in Doha. He referred
to the entire operation as “novel” and “a short-term mechanism.”
But a month later, Energy Secretary Chris Wright said on CNBC that the account had been closed and no more
money would be flowing to or through Qatar…and nobody has identified where it
went, or where it is, since then.
Where’s the money?
Oct. 3, celebrate Cranberry Thanksgiving
This year, the sassiminneash, Narragansett for cranberry, takes center stage in cooking demonstrations featuring Narragansett chef Charles Hankinson, a Johnson & Wales graduate.
The free public event will be held Saturday, October 3rd, 2026, from noon to 4 p.m. at St. Jame’s Parish in Charlestown, Rhode Island. Presented by Rhode Island’s only Indigenous-led museum, it offers an opportunity to experience the importance of the cranberry harvest through archival memories, traditional ecological knowledge, storytelling, social dances, food and art vendors, children’s activities and more. For more information, visit www.tomaquagmuseum.org/events.
St. James Parish, 2079 Matunuck School House Road, Charlestown, Rhode Island 02813
Westerly Town Council meeting features argument over "riff raff"
At least they didn't say "people from Providence"
Adriana
Vossari (an AI-created avatar)
No decisions were made on Westerly's proposed short-term rental zoning amendments at Monday's workshop. Any change would still require a solicitor-drafted ordinance, a vote to advertise, at least three weeks of advertising and public hearings, which the council was told likely leaves action to the next council. Council members sent questions to the solicitor, including on caps and a pause on new applications.
A Westerly Town Council workshop on short-term rentals turned tense Monday night when a council member challenged a resident's remark about "riff raff" earning $30,000 a year, then left the discussion after being told the session would not allow back-and-forth.
Another council
member then apologized to the audience for what they called disrespectful and
condescending remarks, according to the Westerly Town Council's published
meeting recording.
The workshop was called to review
short-term rentals and hear from the public. No votes were taken on the
proposal. In opening remarks, the council was told the session would follow
Robert's Rules, with people speaking one at a time, and that there would be no
dialogue back and forth between individual council members and the public.
The resident's remark
The phrase came from a resident who owns a short-term rental
and spoke during the first round of public comment. The resident urged the
council to grandfather existing registered rentals and questioned the town's
housing goals.
Arguing that other affluent towns have affordable housing,
the resident said the median income in Westerly is $100,000 a year. "So
you're not bringing in riff raff that only makes $30,000 a year," the
resident said, adding that there are qualifications for people to get in.
Scientists Identify a Smartphone Habit That May Be Worse Than Screen Time
Save yourself
By Semmelweis University
Research from Semmelweis University suggests that problematic smartphone use is shaped less by personality alone than by weak self-control and a strong fear of missing out (FOMO). The findings also reveal a divide between mental and physical effects: how people use their phones appears closely tied to attention and memory, while total screen time is more strongly associated with bodily consequences.
Published in Acta Psychologica, the study examined
smartphone habits, mental health, physical well-being, and cognitive
performance among students ages 18 to 35. Participants reported how long they
actively used their phones each day, what they did on them, whether phone use
had disrupted planned tasks, and whether they thought about their devices even
when not using them.
Researchers also evaluated neuroticism, self-control, and
FOMO. Neuroticism describes a tendency to experience emotions such as anxiety,
sadness, fear, and anger. The results suggest that these personality traits may
create vulnerability but do not necessarily lead to problematic phone use
without difficulty controlling impulses or anxiety about missing social
experiences.
The Real Fix for Social Security
We may be on the brink of a bipartisan solution that’s fair
Today I want to talk to you about Social Security.
The trustees
of Social Security — of which yours truly was once a member — say the program
will be able to pay full benefits only until 2033. After
that, Social Security will be able to dole out only roughly 77
percent of benefits due.
This summer, Ohio’s Republican Sen. Bernie Moreno joined
Sen. Elizabeth Warren in proposing to raise the payroll tax cap so people with
higher incomes pay more into the program.
Fairly suddenly, the idea is emerging as an acceptable fix
among other GOP lawmakers, including Rep. Tom Cole (Oklahoma), the
influential chair of the House Appropriations Committee.
Cole thinks the political blowback from Social Security
benefit cuts would be far worse than a comprehensive solution that includes
raising taxes.
It’s another example of Republicans deserting Trump, who
thinks the “fix” for Social Security is to repeal taxes on Social Security
benefits. Trump’s fix will not save Social Security. In fact,
quite the opposite. Without the revenue from Social Security taxes, the Social
Security trust fund will run out of money even sooner.
I’m encouraged by what looks like the start of a Republican
turnaround on this. Not only are Republicans deserting Trump, but they’re
beginning — just beginning — to become sensitive to what average voters need
and want.
Contrary to conventional wisdom, the reason Social Security
is running out of money is not because so many boomers are
retiring.
The Social Security trustees anticipated the boom in boomer
retirements. This is why Social Security was amended back in 1983, to
gradually increase the age for collecting full retirement benefits from 65
to 67. That change is helping finance the boomers’ retirement.
The real reason Social Security is running out of money
is something the trustees never anticipated: how much of the nation’s total
income is going to the top.
Thursday, September 24, 2026
The United States’ human rights practices are taking a nosedive
Rights violations have become widespread and systematic, and not just against immigrants
On one hand, some have pointed to a number of potential human rights abuses committed by the U.S. government inside and outside its borders in the past two years.
On the other hand, while marking the United States’ 250th anniversary this year, Donald Trump called the country “the home of freedom,” “the land of liberty” and “the most extraordinary, most exceptional, most incredible nation ever to exist on the face of the earth.”
“We’re doing better now than we’ve ever done before,” he said.
So which is it?
According to many of the human rights data sources available, the U.S. lags behind most other high-income democracies – countries that are both members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and classified as high income by the World Bank. The U.S.’s poor performance spans civil and political rights, such as the right to be free from torture and the right to political participation, as well as economic and social rights, including the rights to health and food.
In fact, the U.S. has been a relatively poor performer across many of these rights for quite some time, regardless of the political party in power.
Even accounting for the U.S.’s prior poor practices, however, new data from the Human Rights Measurement Initiative shows that in 2025 the country’s civil and political rights performance deteriorated even further.
As a human rights scholar who has been measuring human rights practices for 20 years – and as one of HRMI’s co-founders – I believe this data raises serious questions about the United States’ commitment to human rights.
Donald Trump's big meeting with China's leader
![]() |
| Satire (AI generated), though this could be real. |
Former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau shares insights into Trump policies with Brown University audience
Says Trump’s ‘win-lose’ approach is hurting U.S.-Canada relations
By Christopher Shea, Rhode Island Current
The last time former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was in Rhode Island, he spoke to a gathering of U.S. governors to advocate for free trade amid tensions between the two North American neighbors.
Nearly a decade later, Trudeau returned to Providence where he said the relationship has moved beyond ordinary trade disputes to what he described as a threat to Canada’s sovereignty under the Trump administration
“Canadians are feeling rightly, deeply destabilized by this,” Trudeau told a crowd of more than 2,000 people inside Brown University’s Pizzitola Sports Center Tuesday. “And it seems to have no logical point.”
The former Canadian prime minister’s remarks came as part of Brown’s 106th Stephen A. Ogden Jr. ’60 Memorial Lecture on International Affairs. Much of the hour-long discussion with University President Christina Paxson focused on differences between the two countries’ healthcare systems, the value of diversity and the increasingly strained relationship between the U.S. and its northern neighbor.
Trudeau, 54, served more than nine years as Canada’s 23rd prime minister after leading the Liberal Party to a historic majority government in 2015. Amid declining support and poor polling, he announced in January 2025 that he would resign as prime minister once a successor was chosen. He was succeeded by fellow Liberal Mark Carney that March.
His time in office was marked by the COVID-19 pandemic and the global economic disruptions it caused, along with a domestic agenda that included a gender-balanced cabinet, a national $10-a-day childcare program, efforts toward reconciliation with Indigenous peoples and climate policies aimed at encouraging clean energy investment.



.webp)



.webp)








