What ever happening to the Green New Deal (besides Donald Trum)?

The Green New Deal has evolved. Now it’s all about ‘affordability.’

Kate Yoder, Senior Staff Writer

This story was originally published by Grist. Sign up for Grist's weekly newsletter here.

Eight years ago, three little words took hold of the environmental movement: Green New Deal. Part popular slogan, part political philosophy, the phrase described a sweeping agenda to create jobs, advance social justice, and combat climate change through major public investment inspired by the New Deal of the 1930s. 

The term made its way from hats and protest signs to the halls of power, where it shaped local and national policy. Progressives even pressured future president Joe Biden to adopt plans to address the crisis in the lead-up to the 2020 election.

Congress eventually whittled his ambitions down to the Inflation Reduction Act, a package of green tax credits and incentives that became the nation’s first comprehensive climate policy. That is, until Republicans dismantled the law last year. 

Under Donald Trump, the national policy wins Democrats had scored by leveraging the Green New Deal’s momentum all but vanished. The party was left soul-searching, wondering how it should talk about climate change, or if those calling for solutions should even talk about it at all.

Progressives seem to have settled on an answer: Make everything about affordability. A new climate agenda released by the Climate and Community Institute, a left-leaning think tank, aims to lower costs for everyday people through home insurance rate caps, bans on utility shutoffs, and other measures. 

It promotes “green economic populism,” a framework to provide relief for the working class through policies that also happen to cut carbon emissions (such as free transit or a moratorium on data centers), while regulating the corporations contributing to climate change and the cost-of-living crisis. 

The architects of the so-called “working-class climate agenda” say they’ve learned lessons from the Green New Deal and the Inflation Reduction Act: One lacked political will, while the other failed to deliver tangible results to working-class voters quickly enough. 

No more

Let them eat peanuts

New research reveals that midlife in the U.S. is becoming more stressful and less secure.

Middle Age Is Becoming a Breaking Point in America, Study Reveals

By SciTechDaily.com

Middle age is often portrayed as a time of stability, career peaks, and established family life. It is also tied to familiar stereotypes, from the so-called “midlife crisis” to sudden lifestyle changes. 

In reality, researchers typically define midlife as the period between about ages 40 and 65, a stage that often brings competing demands rather than calm. Many adults are supporting children while also caring for aging parents, all while managing careers, finances, and their own health.

New research suggests that, in the United States, this phase of life has become increasingly difficult in ways that set it apart from other wealthy nations.

Another study on the positive health effects of coffee

Scientists Discover How Coffee Impacts Memory, Mood, and Gut Health

By University College Cork

Researchers at APC Microbiome Ireland, a leading research center at University College Cork, have, for the first time, closely examined how coffee produces positive effects on the gut-brain axis.

The study, published in Nature Communications and supported by the Institute for Scientific Information on Coffee (ISIC), shows that regularly drinking both caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee can shape the gut microbiome and influence mood and stress.

Although coffee’s benefits for digestion and mental well-being are well known, the biological processes behind these effects have not been fully understood. This study explored how coffee affects the microbiota-gut-brain axis, the two-way communication system linking the gut microbiome and the brain, using a wide range of measurements.

Candidates for Governor talk taxes and the economy

Gubernatorial candidates Foulkes, Gregerson, Guckian, and McKee speak out at EPI Tax Policy Summit

Steve Ahlquist

Front runners Foulkes and McKee

“What I’m hearing is visionary leadership,” said Weayonnoh Nelson-Davies, executive director of the Economic Progress Institute (EPI), to the audience gathered in the Hotel Providence. “The people in this room want our leaders to be moved, to dream, and to make things possible. We want leaders who can confront affordability and energy costs, but what does that mean when we’re making policy?

“I’m really inspired by the message that we don’t want a Rhode Island where we are surviving, we want a Rhode Island where we can thrive. That is my dream. I’m so competitive. Rhode Island has been my home state since I immigrated to the United States at 16. I want us to win so bad. I want that fire in our guts. We can make everyone jealous because they don’t live in Rhode Island.

“I’m also very grateful to the candidates running for governor who showed up to not just share with us what they think,” concluded Nelson-Davies, “but to listen to what the people they might be leading tomorrow think as well.”

The Economic Progress Institute held the People’s Tax Policy Summit and Gubernatorial Candidates Reception on Wednesday. The event brought together residents, advocates, and state leaders to discuss rising living costs, tax equity, and the state’s financial future. Here’s the video:

Four candidates for governor, including Helena Foulkes, Will Gregerson, Aaron Guckian, and incumbent Daniel McKee, were provided three minutes to address those in attendance. The candidates were introduced by Chelsea Speaks, from the RICJ (Rhode Island for Community and Justice), and Joseph Ortiz, a “Tax Justice Ambassador” with ARISE (Alliance of Rhode Island Southeast Asians).

The following has been edited for clarity.

Helena Foulkes

“It’s been so fascinating to listen to all of this, and I especially love Weayonnah’s call to all of us to be bold. It’s important. It’s easy to think about the barriers, but her challenge to dream big puts us on the map.

“Four years ago, I walked into a room of about 75 carpenters, and I’ll be honest with you, I thought I knew what that conversation was going to be about: wages, job sites, material costs, etc. Then the first man stood up and started talking about childcare. He talked about what it was doing to his family. I looked around the room and watched them nod, one after another, like he was saying out loud what all of them had been experiencing for years. That moment has never left me because that man wasn’t asking for anything special. He was asking for a Rhode Island that works for families like his, and we have not given it to him.

“The cost of infant care in this state is now higher than in-state college tuition and the average rent. The people who have been running this state will tell you we have universal pre-K, but they are not the parents on the waitlist, the ones who, year after year, get a letter that says there’s no more space.

“It’s not universal if it doesn’t apply to everyone. Less than a third of low-income children are enrolled in Head Start or pre-K. That is not a gap. That is a choice the people in charge of our state government have made year after year, with a $15 billion budget at their disposal. That ends with me.

“Earlier today, I announced the Rhode Island Employer Match Childcare Fund, a $20 million pilot that brings the state and Rhode Island employers together to share the cost of childcare. Employers who invest in childcare retain their workers, grow their teams, and build stronger companies. When families win, Rhode Island wins. I’ll expand tax credits for childcare assistance, and by the end of my second term, every Rhode Island family will have access to universal pre-kindergarten, not universal in name, universal in practice. Childcare is only the beginning because the truth is the squeeze does not stop there: Rhode Island is ranked dead last in the country in new housing starts last year. There’s not a single community in this state where a family making $100,000 a year can afford to buy a home.

“I hear it everywhere I go. People who grew up here, want to stay here, and love this state are being told by the cost of living that there’s no room for them anymore. That’s wrong, and it has to stop. My Rhode Island housing program will build 20,000 new homes and apartments that Rhode Islanders can actually afford, and the wealthiest Rhode Islanders will pay for it.

“And we’re done cutting RIPTA one year and then funding it again in an election year. If people can’t afford to live here and can’t afford to get to work, it doesn’t matter how many good jobs we attract or grow. I will invest $15 million in job access transit routes connecting workers to Quonset, hospitals, and other work sites. No one should have to leave a place they love because they can’t afford to stay.

“So here’s what I’m asking of you: Do not let them tell you this is the best we can do. Do not accept taglines that say ‘affordability for all’ when our state is not affordable. Talk to your neighbors, coworkers, and the parents on the wait list. Tell them things can be different.

“Sixteen years ago, I lost my mother to cancer. It was the hardest thing I’ve ever been through, but before she died, she gathered my siblings and me together, and she said something I’ve always carried with me: ‘Take care of each other.’ That’s why I’m running for governor, because that is what Rhode Island has always been at its best: Neighbors looking out for neighbors and people who show up for each other even when it’s hard. That’s the Rhode Island I believe in, and that is the Rhode Island we’re going to build together.”

US researchers say how the Trump administration’s science policies have affected them

Self‑censorship, more stress, tougher recruiting

Eric Welch, Arizona State University and Timothy P. Johnson, University of Illinois Chicago

The American academic research engine has long been the envy of the world. Generally well-funded, labs in the United States have been able to attract the best minds who generate breakthroughs and train the next generation workforce that powers the U.S. economy. But since the start of the second Trump administration in January 2025, new federal policies have destabilized the American scientific enterprise.

The disruption generated by the Trump administration’s funding, DEI and visa policies has been well reported by the media. On an individual level, though, what do academic researchers think of all these changes and how have they been directly affected?

We are researchers affiliated with Arizona State University’s scientist opinion panel survey, known as SciOPS, a 5-year research program designed to monitor, understand and improve how scientists communicate with the public. We wanted to know more about the reality inside today’s universities as researchers grapple with Trump administration policies.

Along with our colleagues, we fielded a survey of randomly sampled members of the academic science community participating in the SciOPS panel. We obtained responses from 280 scientists from several fields, including biology, chemistry, civil and environmental engineering, computer and information science engineering, geography and public health from 131 universities.

Our results show dramatic, mostly negative, effects of federal policy changes on researchers, the research system and American competitiveness.

Trumpism slime, set to rhyme

May 27: Westerly protest on Wednesday

May 30 open house and free paddling

 

WPWA Open House & Free Paddle Event   WHO: Members and General Public Welcome! WHEN: Saturday May 30th 1pm to 5pm WHERE: 203 Arcadia Rd. Hope Valley, RI 02832 WHAT: FREE Food, Fun, and Paddling   If you know anyone interested in joining the WPWA membership..... this is THE event to invite them to! Please help promote WPWA membership!   Schedule of Activities: 1:30pm Intro to Paddling Lesson 4:00pm Guided Wildlife Paddle   Thank you for helping us grow!

Our Contact Information Wood Pawcatuck Watershed Association 203 Arcadia Rd. Hope Valley, RI 02832 401-539-9017 http://www.wpwa.org

Senate passes Sosnowski bill to create medical school at University of Rhode Island

One step closer

The Senate passed legislation introduced by Sen. V. Susan Sosnowski that would establish a medical school at the University of Rhode Island. It’s part of the Senate’s 17-bill package of healthcare legislation centered on supporting Rhode Islanders in crisis, protecting patients and providers, and strengthening the state’s health workforce.

Last year, a special legislative commission undertook an independent feasibility study that recommended the establishment of a public, M.D.-granting medical education program at URI, and outlined a proposed four-year, five-phase plan that would culminate in the launch of the program’s charter class in autumn 2029.

The act (2026-S 3604) would establish the framework to create the medical school and provide an initial appropriation of $5 million as the first phase of a multi-year investment for its development.

Foulkes Unveils Phase Two of “Believe in Rhode Island” Economic Plan

Focus on the basics

Helena Buonanno Foulkes shared the second component of her Believe in Rhode Island economic plan. This phase is centered around the belief that you cannot have an economic plan that ignores where people can afford to live, how they can get to work, and whether they have affordable childcare to rely on. 

“Rhode Islanders work hard. They deserve a state that works just as hard for them. With the high cost of childcare, transportation, and housing, even good-paying jobs aren’t enough to help lower costs for Rhode Islanders,” said Helena. “Today, I’m proud to announce the second part of my Believe in Rhode Island economic plan, which invests in the services that jobs depend on, like childcare and transportation, so Rhode Islanders can afford to go to work in the good-paying jobs we’re creating in the Ocean State.”

Helena’s Plan for Working Families includes:

• Childcare and Pre-K that’s accessible and affordable: A Rhode Island employer-matched childcare fund, starting with a $20 million pilot, designed to reduce the cost of care for working parents.
• Greater housing supply and lower housing costs: Helena previously announced her Rhode Home Program, a comprehensive proposal to tackle our state’s housing crisis head on by creating a billion-dollar revolving loan fund—paid for by a marginal tax increase on Rhode Islanders making over a million dollars—to spur the construction of 20,000 new homes and apartments statewide. 
• Job-access transit routes: A $15 million first-year appropriation for job-access routes connecting workers to Quonset, ProvPort, hospital campuses, and the warehouse corridor. This will include expanded transportation routes and access to jobs in the ocean economy, allowing workers throughout Rhode Island to benefit from state investments in a growing industry that depends on skilled workers to fill good-paying jobs.

 Read Helena’s Childcare & Transportation for Working Families plan here.

Trump and Bobby Jr.'s vaccine cover-up

Why the FDA tried to bury studies showing vaccines are safe

Jake Scott, MD

In October, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) scientists were directed to withdraw two COVID-19 vaccine safety studies that had already been accepted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. In February, top officials refused to sign off on submitting two abstracts on the Shingrix vaccine, used to prevent shingles, to a major drug safety conference. Christina Jewett at the New York Times reported the scope of these decisions.

A spokesman for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) confirmed the withdrawals on the record, saying the studies were withdrawn because "the authors drew broad conclusions that were not supported by the underlying data" and that "the F.D.A. acted to protect the integrity of its scientific process and ensure that any work associated with the agency meets its high standards." 

The studies are public. Anyone can read them. The FDA's own scientists, working with the active surveillance system Congress mandated after the withdrawal of Vioxx, an anti-inflammatory pain reliever, in 2004 after it was tied to increased heart attacks and strokes, produced findings consistent with every major post-market analysis of these vaccines published worldwide since 2023. 

The work was buried for reasons that have nothing to do with the underlying data.

What the studies actually found

One of the COVID vaccine studies, involving US adults 65 and older, was withdrawn from the journal Drug Safety after acceptance. It analyzed more than 7 million Medicare beneficiaries who received the 2023-24 vaccine. The investigators evaluated 14 specific health outcomes, ranging from heart attacks and strokes to Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), an autoimmune condition that has been linked to certain vaccines. 

They identified one statistically meaningful signal: a small elevation in anaphylaxis (a severe allergic reaction) following the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. After they adjusted for the possibility that some "anaphylaxis" billing codes did not represent true cases, the signal disappeared. The attributable risk, before that adjustment, was less than one excess case of anaphylaxis per million doses administered. The investigators concluded that no new safety signals had been identified.

Returning to the flock

Let's try having a king again

credit: Jesse Duquette