Menu Bar

Home           Calendar           Topics          Just Charlestown          About Us

Saturday, August 22, 2026

This Flesh-Eating Fly Is Back in the U.S.

Scientists Are Tracking Where It Could Strike Next

By Mika Ono, University of California - San Diego

New World Screwworm Larva
Meet our little friend. New World screwworm larva close up, and the mouth hooks they use to eat living flesh. Credit: USDA

A wound no bigger than a tick bite can be enough for New World screwworm to take hold.

A female New World screwworm fly can deposit hundreds of eggs at a time in an animal’s or person’s wound. When those eggs hatch, the larvae do something most maggots do not: they burrow into healthy flesh and begin feeding. A single female may lay as many as 3,000 eggs during her lifetime.

For decades, the United States had largely escaped that threat. An ambitious eradication campaign eliminated New World screwworm from the country and eventually forced the parasite south to Panama. But after spreading north through Central America and Mexico, the fly has returned.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture confirmed the first animal case of the current U.S. outbreak on June 3, 2026. Since then, detections have been reported in Texas and New Mexico. Across Central America and Mexico, the wider outbreak has already produced more than 209,400 reported animal cases and 2,440 human cases. No locally acquired human infestations have been reported in the United States, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention say the current risk to the U.S. public remains very low.

Scientists Race to Predict Screwworm’s Next Move

The return is reviving memories of a pest that once inflicted enormous losses on American agriculture. In the 1950s, New World screwworm cost U.S. livestock producers tens of millions of dollars annually, with losses reaching an estimated $50 million to $100 million a year in the hardest-hit areas of the Southwest.

Now, researchers and public health officials are trying to answer an urgent question before the fly spreads farther: Where is it most likely to appear next?

The threat of more, expanded measles outbreaks looms with start of school

With measles on the rise, school gets riskier

Sarah Boden

CDC’s map showing where in the United States the most measles cases have been reported for 2026.  The states with the most cases are South Carolina, Utah, Pennsylvania, Texas and Virginia.
Map showing where the most measles cases have been reported in the United States in 2026. 
 Credit: CDC

School starts soon in north-central Colorado and pediatrician Shen Nagel, MD, is bracing for the possibility of a measles outbreak. 

In some ways this is par for the course. After major holidays and summer breaks, kids bring viruses back to their classrooms, and Nagel sees spikes of flu, respiratory syncytial virus and other respiratory illnesses, among his patients at Pediatrics West, a practice in suburban Denver.

Measles might soon be added to that list, though it wasn't a disease that pediatricians worried about much when Nagel started practicing 25 years ago. But post-COVID-19, dropping vaccination rates and conflicting federal messaging have created an opening for measles, widely considered the most contagious infectious disease known to humans. 

The good news is that most parents do get their kids the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, which is 97% effective after two doses. Experts who spoke to CIDRAP News for this story say that if a fully vaccinated child has a normal immune system, parents shouldn't worry about their child catching measles at school—especially if that school has a relatively high vaccination rate. Outbreaks are extremely unlikely in communities where overall MMR coverage is 95%.

Friday, August 21, 2026

“Travel with Natalie”

How three words from Jon Ossoff prompted an epic MAGA crash-out.

Tom Schaller

Donald Trump is easily triggered. That’s hardly news.

He’s temperamental and emotional in a way that supposedly disqualifies women from serving in powerful political or corporate roles. He lashes out at critics, opponents, the media, even his own staff. 

Were it not so frightening, it would be Veep-level hysterical that the man atop the world’s most powerful government and military lacks the impulse control of a high schooler.

But the questions now swirling around Trump’s personal assistant Natalie Harp — and especially the way Sen. Jon Ossoff unleashed a media firestorm this week by invoking her name — offer a long overdue lesson for Democrats on how to successfully bait Trump and his MAGA cohorts for maximum effect.

Harp strikes a chord

Let’s start by unpacking what Ossoff actually said last Sunday, which was not nearly as salacious as the ensuing MAGA meltdown would have you believe.

“While the sailors on the Lincoln fight his war, while he fruitlessly drains our munitions and oil reserves, the president sleeps through his meetings. He golfs and trades stocks,” said Ossoff, of Trump. “See, he doesn’t want to do the job. He wants to build his ballroom and travel with Natalie on their apparently defenseless flying palace gifted by the Emir of Qatar.”

In just four sentences, Ossoff’s carefully crafted language shattered Trump’s curated image as a tough, tireless, troop-loving, America First warrior. The Georgia senator indicted Trump’s military misadventures and octogenarian stamina. He highlighted Trump’s sloth and greed. Ossoff depicted Trump as a detached, spoiled, soft, and vainglorious brat who could make Charli XCX blush.

But the kicker was these three words: “travel with Natalie.”

Ossoff’s statement would have delivered the same critique of Trump as an entitled, lazy lout had he omitted any mention of Harp. But he dropped her name — and only her first name, plus the first-person plural “their” for emphasis — to pair them and suggest a degree of interpersonal intimacy.

Ossoff’s gambit worked perfectly. Americans immediately wanted to learn who Natalie Harp is. 

Answer: a “platinum blonde geyser of positivity, there to buck him up when the going gets rough,” as the New York Times described the young aide who serves as Trump’s personal, 24/7 “security blanket.”

Media journalist Brian Stelter reported that searches for “who is Natalie Harp?” surged an astounding 5,000 percent, and Fox News’ Jesse Watters had to admit on air that his program had not mentioned Ossoff in six years but now his network was talking about the young senator nonstop.

The White House and conservative pundits lost their marbles, crying foul about attacks on the young staffer and veiled implications of her and Trump having an affair.

More amusing and hypocritical is how conservative apologists rushed to Harp’s defense, depicting her as a child immune to attention or attacks, and the victim of sexist “dehumanization.” (In fact, Harp is 35 — an adult more than twice the age of the Central Park 5 Black youths when Trump called for their execution before they were even tried for a crime that, it turned out, they never committed.)

There’s more: Harp is apparently so obsessed with Trump she’s happy to serve as his emotional support companion.

In 2023, Harp twice dodged presidential security protocols and wary Trump staffers to get close to Trump — once, by securing a maid’s room at Trump’s Bedminster, New Jersey golf club, and then by sneaking into an SUV trunk in Trump’s motorcade. She behaves like a rock band groupie, not a presidential adviser.

Harp has also skirted security clearance checks, a fact that suggests Trump is willing to sacrifice national security to maintain his emotional “security blanket.” That’s the term Ossoff used to describe Harp when, instead of apologizing or backtracking as weak-willed Democrats often do when facing backlash, he doubled down on his Trump attack during a Monday television interview with MS NOW’s Jen Psaki.

Ossoff shows the way

But enough about poor Natalie — back to Ossoff.

The senator and his speechwriters clearly understand that powerful words do more than assert or indict: They create imagery.

Ossoff painted a picture of Trump flying in comfortable, Middle Eastern-supplied luxury, oblivious to the problems around him, his every need and indulgence fulfilled like some oleaginous sultan. That image contrasts sharply with his MAGA cult supporters’ rally flags depicting Trump as a bandana-wearing Rambo delivering rough justice.

Depicting Trump as Ossoff skillfully did generated paroxysms from Republican politicians and conservative talking heads.

The right-wing media narrative is lousy with depictions of liberals and Democrats living better than — and therefore condescending to — their lessors: those humble, hardworking, heartland Americans. Ossoff delivered this same appraisal of Trump in fewer words than a median-length William Faulkner sentence. The senator’s quip was a Thomas Nast cartoon sketched with four sentences.

And therein lies the key lesson of this episode: Trump can be weakened by policy attacks, especially on the economy and his foolhardy war with Iran. But politicians in the new media age who want to gain traction — no less run for the White House — need to talk less in stentorian policy tones, like a Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren, and more like Jimmy Kimmel or Chelsea Handler.

The Georgia senator whom many believe to be a frontrunner for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination understands that Democrats need more than “affordability” policy messages to win in 2026 and beyond. They need to depict Trump as feeble, selfish, and tone-deaf.

By inserting Harp into the national political discourse, Ossoff inverted the national narrative about which side is politically soft and entitled. The 2028 presidential election is more than two years away, but this week Ossoff put his party and the punditry on notice that he will be a skilled and formidable contender.

A flustered Trump dismissed Ossoff as “Pee Wee Herman.” Weak tea.

Trump’s snide derogatories have lost their oomph. More to the point, like all bullies his feckless response proves he can throw a punch but can’t take one.

And the senator’s invocation of “Natalie” — leaving out her last name to imply some special intimacy between Harp and Trump — was the shiny frame that drew millions of eyes to the Trumpian imagery Ossoff so deftly painted.

Troll bridge to 2028

Conservative media routinely dismiss Trump’s opponents by attaching the “Trump Derangement Syndrome” label to those who dare to criticize their MAGA champion. But nobody is more troll-able and deranged than the thin-skinned, fragile male egoist who currently occupies the Oval Office.

Narcissists like Donald Trump cannot abide criticism, and no critique is more effective with insecure narcissists than mockery. Making fun of Trump as a lazy, unpatriotic, and ineffective president cuts to his bone. Trump commits ample policy and political errors without provocation, but he is far more prone to blunder when under attack and on the defensive. And so are his allies.

Trump’s supporters warn that if Democrats recapture the House this fall, they will immediately impeach Trump for a third time. His self-dealing corruption, which makes Watergate look like a parking ticket, alone warrants his removal. But to paraphrase a time-worn maxim, if you try to kill a wannabe king you better succeed. Even if Democrats flip the Senate, they will not have enough Republican support to convict Trump on any House impeachment article.

The better way to impeach Trump is to rattle his confidence and destroy his heavily-curated image as a tough and competent patriot. This week, Jon Ossoff separated himself from the pack by providing liberals and Democrats a perfect formula for how to do so.

Thanks for reading Public Notice. This post is public so feel free to share it.

Too much?

Early voting has begun. Do you need a ride?

Sunday Women's Equality Day event in Westerly

Trump Threatens to ‘Bomb the Shit’ Out of Oman as Strait of Hormuz Traffic Again Grinds to a Halt

Add another US ally to the list of formerly friendly nations Trump wants to bomb

Brad Reed for Common Dreams

Donald Trump threatened to bomb a US ally in the Middle East if it gets in the way of a perpetually elusive deal with Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

Speaking with Fox News, Trump was asked about talks that Iran and Oman have been conducting about jointly overseeing operations of the strait, which has been shut down ever since Trump started an illegal war in late February.

Trump replied that “if Oman gets in the way” of reopening the strait, “we’ll bomb the shit out of them.”

It is unclear how effective Trump’s threats against Oman will be, as the US military still hasn’t forced Iran to reopen the strait even after burning through massive stocks of munitions—including what military sources have described to The Military Times as “virtually all” of its Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM).

Bug report: High risk of West Nile Virus

Will flu, COVID-19 vaccines be available this fall?

What road blocks will Bobby Jr. and Trump throw up?

Meghan Holohan

As fall nears and the respiratory illness season begins, many people are wondering if they’ll be able to receive updated flu and COVID-19 vaccines amid the turmoil created by the federal government about vaccines. Some worry that recent changes could mean they have to pay out of pocket for their annual doses. 

But experts say Americans don’t have to worry about vaccine coverage—this year, at least. 

“There will be available an updated influenza vaccine and an updated COVID vaccine. So far, that’s pretty normal,” William Schaffner, MD, professor of infectious diseases at Vanderbilt Health and spokesperson for the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), told CIDRAP News. “Insurers, that is, the medical insurance industry, have said that they would cover those vaccines.” 

While Actively Trying to Deny Millions This Right, Trump Again Votes by Mail

Is it possible Trump votes by may BECAUSE it is "inherently corrupt?"

Stephen Prager for Common Dreams

Donald Trump has pushed to strip millions of Americans of the right to vote by mail. But he doesn’t seem to think these restrictions should apply to him.

The White House confirmed to The New York Times that the president voted by mail ahead of Florida’s Republican primary on Tuesday, marking at least the third time he has done so since becoming president. He also voted by mail in a state legislative special election earlier this year and in the 2020 Republican primary.

Though Trump has repeatedly characterized mail-in voting itself as a form of “cheating” and pushed to abolish it for most Americans under his proposed SAVE America Act, White House spokesperson Olivia Wales said it was a “non-story” that he chose to participate in the practice himself.

“The SAVE America Act has commonsense exceptions for Americans to use mail-in ballots for illness, disability, military, or travel— but universal mail-in voting should not be allowed because it’s highly susceptible to fraud,” she said. “As everyone knows, the president is a resident of Palm Beach and participates in Florida elections, but he obviously primarily lives at the White House in Washington, DC.”

Florida notably does not distinguish between absentee and other forms of mail-in voting, allowing residents to cast votes without an excuse—so the system Trump used to vote by mail is the same one he wants to make illegal.

Failing to pass his SAVE America Act through Congress, Trump has attempted to restrict mail-in voting via executive order.

Thursday, August 20, 2026

Inside Trump’s Failed Hunt for Noncitizen Voters

You want to find voter fraud? You're looking in the wrong place

By Peter ElkindJen FifieldDoug Bock ClarkKen B. Morales and Andy Mannix for ProPublica

Looking for voter fraud? Here are filings by Vic Mellor, Republican, on June 16 with the Justice Department as an agent of the Cuban government. Mellor wants to win the Sept. 9 Republican primary here in Rhode Island so he can run against Rep. Seth Magaziner (D) for the Second Congressional District seat.
Aside from the huge question of what the hell is Mellor doing representing the Cuban government, note that on his filing he lists his home address as Florida. Mellor filed his candidacy notice on November 1 with the Federal Election Commission, giving a Rhode Island address. That is contradicted by this filing made by him more than six months later. One of these two failings was false.

It was late March when Joe Teirab, the second-in-command at Minnesota’s U.S. attorney’s office, received an urgent email from Washington.

The federal government was scrambling to find criminal cases to back up President Donald Trump’s claims that illegal voting by noncitizens was tipping the scales in American elections. Agents from Homeland Security Investigations, a massive federal law enforcement agency, had been dispatched to work leads across the country, including hundreds in Minnesota.

Teirab was already under pressure. In an earlier missive, Nick Davis, a high-ranking Justice Department appointee helping to lead the election fraud crusade, had reminded him the cases were so high priority that Teirab and his staff couldn’t decline to move forward on them without express approval from agency higher-ups. On March 24, Davis demanded a status report — within hours.

Teirab, a former Marine and a Harvard Law graduate who’d run unsuccessfully for Congress as a Republican, responded with a blunt reality check.

“Bottom line up front,” he replied in an email reviewed by ProPublica. After subpoenaing records on about 130 people, only one had been referred for prosecution, his staff had told him. Agents had deluged local election offices with calls and demands for voting histories, demonstrating “a complete lack of understanding” of illegal voting investigations.

“The HSI task force has been disjointed and disorganized,” Teirab wrote. The entire process, he said, had been “dysfunctional.”

Ken Paxton wants to find voter fraud.
Did he look here...

Since Trump regained the White House, his administration has launched a series of unprecedented initiatives to find and prosecute voting by noncitizens, which he’s long claimed, without evidence, is rampant.

He’s stepped up this push in recent weeks, saying in a nationally televised speech that the American election system was “so vulnerable that no one can possibly defend it.” To support that assertion, the Department of Homeland Security, HSI’s parent agency, released documents asserting it had found more than 250,000 noncitizens on voter rolls in just four states, all led by Democrats. The documents included no explanation of how that number was calculated.

It’s well known the administration has tasked HSI — a force established to combat drug cartels, terrorism and other cross-border criminal enterprises — with leading the campaign to find election fraud cases in the United States.

Did he look in the mirror?

But an investigation by ProPublica reveals for the first time how the Trump administration came to harness HSI’s personnel, technology and sweeping legal authority in service of its election agenda — and how meager the results have been, despite the prodigious resources sunk into the effort.

According to interviews and internal emails reviewed by ProPublica, career staffers at the Justice Department warned that transferring voter rolls to HSI to enable it to search for noncitizen voters could violate federal privacy laws. Similarly, longtime HSI insiders cautioned that using the agency’s databases and tools to search these lists would yield mismatches and wildly inflated results.

The administration plowed forward anyway.

Meet the CRU slate for Charlestown municipal office on August 25

 

Dan McKee declares "I AM the state of Rhode Island"

Helena Foulkes objected to McKee talking over her during their final debate and provoked King Dan's reply:

This was during their final debate before the September 9 Democratic Primary.

Westerly Residents Demand Action on License-Plate Cameras

Councilors Say They Have No Power Over Them

Adriana Vossari, RI & Local Government

Two license-plate reading cameras operate in Westerly — one privately owned, one run by state police — and councilors said the town has no contract with the company and no direct power to remove them. No vote was taken.

Residents used the second public comment period at the Westerly Town Council's Monday, August 17 meeting to object to automated license-plate reading cameras in town, and councilors responded that the town has no contract with the camera company and, by their own account, no direct authority over the two devices now operating here.

The exchange, captured in the Westerly Town Council's published meeting recording, produced one concrete factual point from the town manager: the town has never subscribed to the license-plate reader service, does not hold a contract with it, and its own downtown and beach camera footage stays in municipal hands. The practical takeaway for residents is that the cameras they are worried about are not the town's to switch off.

What the speakers said

A lifelong Westerly resident, speaking before the council for the first time, said he was driven to attend out of "grave concern" over the growing presence of the cameras. He told the council that communities nationwide have canceled contracts or banned the devices, and cited the Institute for Justice's tally of more than 100 documented cases of license-plate reader abuse. He said South Kingstown had become the 100th community to reject the readers, attributing that count to a camera-tracking project, and referenced a Rhode Island lawsuit over a wrongful arrest he said stemmed from a false positive. Those figures are his characterizations; the transcript contains no independent verification of them.

He also raised data-sharing, citing a 2018 Electronic Frontier Foundation study he said found only a fraction of a percent of scans are tied to public safety, and said some municipalities had shared data with more than 800 agencies. He said the company shortened its default data retention period from 30 days to seven, but called the changes minimal.

Looking for ways to take the stain out of well water

URI team to address remediation challenges of manganese in R.I. drinking water

By Krysta Murray, writer, College of Engineering.

Black and brown stains shown here in a sample sink
are classic effects of manganese.

A partnership between the University of Rhode Island and Rhode Island Department of Health will study manganese levels in Rhode Island’s drinking water. The project, “Statewide Support for Manganese Management in Rhode Island,” will be funded by a grant from the Emerging Contaminants in Small and Disadvantaged Communities through the health department’s Center for Drinking Water Quality and Rhode Island Infrastructure Bank. It runs through Sept. 30, 2030.

Manganese is naturally occurring and comprises an appreciable portion of the earth’s crust. New England has higher concentrations of manganese than other parts of the U.S., due to glacial drifts that make up the region’s geology. Rhode Island depends on groundwater sources that have contact with the subsurface. Groundwater supplies roughly 26 percent of the state’s population with drinking water with an estimated two-thirds of that from public water supply and another third from private wells.

Bunker, left, a graduate student in the civil and environmental department and primary graduate student assigned to this project, and Joe Goodwill assess a water system in Rhode Island.

“Manganese in drinking water is a pervasive health issue and treatment challenge across Rhode Island,” said Zach Shepard, principal environmental health risk assessment toxicologist on the project for RIDOH and a URI alumnus. “Public water systems, especially small systems and private well owners, are impacted by manganese in their water. In this project, RIDOH has partnered with URI to provide technical assistance to people who are impacted by manganese.”

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency established a lifetime human health advisory benchmark of 0.3 mg/L of manganese. In trace amounts, it is essential for human survival, metabolism, and bone health. RIDOH enforces safe manganese limits in drinking water at 0.3 mg/L for infants aged one year or younger and 1.0 mg/L for everyone older than a year. Too much manganese can lead to neurological effects, especially with long-term exposure.