Setting the Record Straight
Chariho United
Recently, School Committee members Ed Lowe and Larry Phelps circulated handouts on Facebook and at the July 6 Hopkinton Town Council meeting during public comment, making claims about school facility costs and student performance in Chariho. Some of the underlying numbers come from state reports. The headlines and conclusions do not. Here's what the record actually shows.
Claim: Administrative neglect caused a $40 million increase in elementary school repair costs
Lowe and Phelps compared elementary school facility needs identified in a 2017 report to a 2025 report and landed on roughly a $40 million increase, framing it as proof of neglect by district administration.
Two things are at play. First, these facility assessments were not conducted or commissioned by Chariho administration. Both the 2017 Jacobs report and the 2025 Bureau Veritas reports were commissioned by the Rhode Island Department of Education. Second, and more importantly, Bureau Veritas explicitly warns against comparing the two reports' dollar figures directly, because nine years of construction cost inflation makes a straight comparison misleading. Its own methodology applies a 144.3% inflation multiplier, based on the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics' Producer Price Index, specifically so the 2017 numbers can be fairly compared to 2025 dollars.
When you run that same math across all four Chariho elementary schools, the real increase is about $29.9 million, not $40 million. Lowe and Phelps's number appears to come from skipping the inflation adjustment the state's own consultant says is necessary.
It's also worth looking at what that money is actually for. Across all four elementary schools, only about 4.9% of the total identified need is classified as "Performance/Integrity," meaning a system that has failed or is unreliable. Zero dollars are classified as safety issues. The remaining 87 to 96% of costs at each individual school fall under "Aged But Functional" or "Lifecycle/Renewal," meaning normal, expected aging of buildings that are 60 to 90 years old, not evidence of neglect. At Richmond Elementary, the report also notes that Chariho facilities staff had already identified and priced a fix for the one item flagged as a failed condition, a leaking facade and gutter system, before the assessment was even completed.
These are public documents. Read
the full assessments for yourself rather than taking anyone's summary,
including ours


.png)














