Progressive Charlestown
a fresh, sharp look at news, life and politics in Charlestown, Rhode Island
Friday, June 19, 2026
Monday Charlestown Town Council meeting loaded with big issues
| |||||||||||||
|
Coal pollution is cutting solar power output, study finds
Will Trump look for ways to use coal to kill wind turbines?
University of Oxford
![]() |
| Trump's 2-for-1 obsession: promote coal, kill green energy |
The new study mapped and assessed more than 140,000 solar PV installations worldwide using satellite data.
By combining this with atmospheric data on air pollution, the researchers calculated how much sunlight is lost and how this reduces electricity generation. They found that aerosols - tiny particles suspended in the air - reduced global solar electricity output by 5.8% in 2023. This is equivalent to 111 terawatt-hours (TWh) of lost energy – the amount generated by 18 medium-sized coal-fired power plants.
Crucially, these losses represent a significant and often overlooked constraint on the clean energy transition.
MAHA’s Treatments for Autism: Camel’s Milk, Stem Cell Injections — And Spelling Therapy
Kennedy turning health science inside out
By Arthur Allen
Elizabeth Bonker is a silent woman with a loud mission. She wants government agencies to cover the costs of training people with autism in a form of communication called assisted spelling. One problem: Leading professional organizations don’t believe it works.
“All nonspeakers above the age of 5 should be given the opportunity,” typed Bonker, who is 28 and cannot talk. Her mother, Virginia Breen, held a wireless keyboard for her. They sat on a hotel patio before an April 27 meeting with a senior aide to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
“We are misunderstood and underestimated,” Bonker typed, occasionally humming or lightly groaning as she considered where to place a slender forefinger on the keyboard.
Assisted spelling is used to help nonverbal people communicate by pointing to letters on boards or using keyboards with physical help from another person.
Supporters say assisted spelling has improved the lives of thousands of people with autism, such as Bonker, and they have powerful allies. Kennedy appointed Bonker and another autistic “speller,” as they call themselves, to a 20-member autism panel made up largely of parents with children whose autism they attribute to vaccinations.
At the reconfigured panel’s first public session on April 28, three other members said their nonspeaking adult children were learning to communicate through spelling. The panel issued a resolution with language from Bonker stating that “robust” communications programs are essential for autistic people. Bonker has urged the Department of Health and Human Services to support training in assisted spelling for those who want it.
But leading professional groups for autism science, as well as those representing psychologists and speech pathologists, point to research showing that these methods — premised on the idea that people with autism have the normal range of cognitive powers but are imprisoned in malfunctioning bodies — are flawed or fraudulent.
Trump issues rules for sick people on Medicaid
"Throw down your crutches and go pick cotton"
By Sam Whitehead
The Trump administration has issued final rules on how states should ensure that millions of Medicaid enrollees prove they’re working or completing other activities, such as job training, volunteering, or being enrolled in an educational program.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services released the rules on June 1. That deadline was set last year in the GOP tax-and-spending law known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which established a work requirement for certain people enrolled in Medicaid, the state-federal health insurance program for people with low incomes or disabilities.
Medicaid agencies are scrambling to rework IT systems and make sure they have staff to effectively enforce the rules, while also keeping enrollees from losing coverage for administrative reasons, such as difficulty navigating state eligibility portals.
The newly announced regulations offer a clearer picture of what roughly 18.5 million Medicaid enrollees will have to do to prove they qualify for benefits.
Jim Torres, who helps people enroll in health coverage at the Samuel U. Rodgers Health Center in Kansas City, Missouri, said a “very small percentage” of his clients have heard of the changes coming to Medicaid.
Thursday, June 18, 2026
Sen. Victoria Gu gives her review on the recently ended General Assembly session
Highlights from a productive session
By Victoria Gu
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
‘AI gravity’ is pulling you toward dependency.
Here’s how to push back
By Beth Stackpole, MIT Sloan School of Management
As businesses pull out all the stops to integrate artificial intelligence tools into mainstream workflows and business practices, they may be overlooking the longer-term implications of widespread AI use on institutional knowledge and critical thinking.
Top of Form
Eric So, a professor of global economics and behavioral science at the MIT Sloan School of Management, believes that AI is changing the way people’s brains operate, creating a trap where users become overly dependent on the technology, with potentially serious ramifications for business.
“We are increasingly deferring tasks that our brains are
meant to handle to AI systems that think for us, write for us, and create on
our behalf,” said So, presenting recently as part of the MIT Sloan speaker
series, “AI + X: How AI Is Changing Management Practice.”
“Each time we engage in this sort of cognitive outsourcing,
we’re participating in dramatic societal change” — one that shouldn’t be taken
lightly, said So, who addresses those changes in depth in his forthcoming book,
“The Collision:
What AI Does to Us.”
“We need to do as much as we can to preserve our
capabilities, to recognize when these tools are wrong, to understand when they
are missing something, and to be able to take action when these systems fail,”
he said.
mRNA Cancer vaccine sustains 49% melanoma reduction after 5 years
Trump and Bobby Jr. are trying to kill this type of vaccine
edited by Sadie Harley, reviewed by Robert Egan
The combination of a vaccine and a drug, which both harness the immune system to attack cancer cells, has proven successful in cutting the risk of skin cancer recurrence and death by 49%, a new study shows. This reduction was calculated five years after patients had their tumors surgically removed and remains unchanged.How the melanoma trial worked
Led by researchers at NYU Langone Health and its Perlmutter
Cancer Center, the study tested the vaccine, called intismeran, in combination
with mainstay immunotherapy pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in 107 patients who had
been randomly chosen after melanoma surgery to determine whether the
combination therapy prevented their cancer from recurring.
Intismeran is a personalized immunotherapy strategy that is
developed with information from a patient's individual tumor. These results
were compared with those from a randomly selected group of 50 melanoma patients
who had only received pembrolizumab postoperatively, a current standard of
care.
Federal flood insurance carries 2 moral hazards – which you face depends largely on how wealthy you are
The high costs of climate risk
Anyone who has been through a flood or hurricane knows the scene: waterlogged furniture piled on curbs, gutted homes with mold creeping up the walls, families displaced for months. But the recovery isn’t the same for everyone.
While federal flood insurance subsidizes risky coastal and waterfront development for wealthier homeowners by lowering the cost of living in these areas, many low-income households in flood-prone areas remain stuck with risky properties and little help.
As a disaster recovery researcher, I’ve witnessed how perverse incentives create different cycles of vulnerability across income levels. The problem with federal disaster insurance today isn’t just about subsidizing wealthier coastal homeowners – it’s equally about leaving low-income households systematically underinsured without resources to either protect themselves or leave.
Federal flood insurance’s moral hazards
The National Flood Insurance Program was established by Congress in 1968 to provide affordable flood insurance to the public while encouraging floodplain management.
Communities that participate in the program are required to adopt regulations to reduce flood risk in their areas for their residents to qualify. The insurance policies, around 4.7 million today, are purchased either through the program or insurance companies but administered and underwritten by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the nation’s disaster response agency. When the policy cost is lower than the risk, the property is being subsidized by the federal program.
The National Flood Insurance Program did succeed in providing accessible insurance for many people, but it also produced a “moral hazard,” where people take on risk without bearing its full consequences. What’s less well understood is that this operates differently by income level.
FEMA is currently working to adjust flood insurance prices to more closely match each property’s actual risk. The program’s Risk Rating 2.0 changes, which began in 2021, aimed to transition policies to full-risk pricing for everyone. The annual premium increases are capped by law at 18% for primary residences, so full-risk pricing won’t be fully reached until around 2037, according to federal estimates.
But there’s another, less visible problem: Federal flood insurance already wasn’t affordable for many people.
In low-income neighborhoods, more than 90% of households are estimated to be underinsured, and their uninsured losses when they experience flooding often exceeds 20% of their annual income.
Many families are unable to afford federal flood insurance premiums – only 37% of all policyholders pay less than $1,000 per year, according to FEMA. Instead, homeowners may skip insurance, gambling that disasters won’t strike. When floods do occur, these households can face catastrophic uninsured losses.
Homeowners and renters may also choose federal flood insurance plans with lower premiums but that provide less coverage in a disaster, and even those plan costs can be high.
Because the federal flood insurance program doesn’t specifically help those who cannot afford premiums, this creates a structural trap: Wealthier homeowners receive government-subsidized insurance support for risky properties, while many lower-income households fall outside the system entirely.
EDITOR'S NOTE: Last year, Cathy and I received two homeowner insurance cancellations because of climate risk. A final carrier agreed to cover us on the condition we also buy federal flood insurance even though we are up on the tip of the moraine north of Route 1. That added an additional $1200 to the high premium charged by the new carrier. - Will Collette
Wednesday, June 17, 2026
Charlestown Democrats - Don’t be fooled
There is only ONE Democrat running in the September 9 primary
By Will Collette
| Boisclair sign in front of Jim Mageau's house. Photo by Will Collette |
Here in Charlestown, September 9 will decide who will represent Charlestown in the Rhode Island House of Representatives.
It will
feature incumbent Rep. Tina Spears, running for a third term versus
self-described sex crime lawyer Leah Boisclair who is backed by
rich MAGA gun nut Dave Levesque.
Here is her "menu" of sex crimes she is willing to defend from her own website:
![]() |
| Rape, child rape, child pornography, sex trafficking, slavery are all crimes Boisclair will defend |
Boisclair is running as a Democrat even though she has no connection to the Democratic Party other than to say she’s a Democrat this year. Her signs are popping up along South County Trail, including in front of the house of Charlestown’s most vocal Trumper Jim Mageau.
Her record is that of running a law practice that takes
pride in representing child abusers, rapists, spouse beaters, bad drivers, crooks
and cheats. She uses her website
to advertise these specialties and to seek more such clients.
Sure, under the Constitution, everyone is entitled to the
presumption of innocence and to legal counsel. But LAWYERS choose who
they will represent.
Even public defenders have discretion under the Code
of Professional Responsibility to decline representation to a client if
they are unable to mount a rigorous defense. In fact, the Rhode Island version
of the Code expressly acknowledges “[A] lawyer is also guided by personal
conscience and the approbation of professional peers.”
Boisclair CHOOSES to represent scumbags. Don’t believe me? READ her own website, as well as the screenshots I have presented taken directly from that site. I was particularly impressed with her graphics in this section on her representation of men accused of crimes against women:
But wait, there's MORE! Here are the other types of crime she will defend:
How is Boisclair different from, for example, a mob lawyer? Or a Trump lawyer? Or a lawyer defending men in Jeffrey Epstein’s circle of friends? Or any other pedo protector? I dunno…you tell me.
I would not want to spend a lot of time in her office's waiting room.
On this alone, I could never support Boisclair. Frankly, why would ANY Charlestown voter want Boisclair to represent then in the General Assembly? I’d rather
bring back Flip Filippi, even though he represented
the January 6 insurrectionists, the Oath Keepers. But as the saying goes,
“but wait, there’s more!”
Boisclair’s main backer, far right MAGA gun nut Dave Levesque, set up 40, count ‘em 40, political action committees under the banner of the “League of Rhode Island Businesses” (LORIB). He has a statewide plus 39 “local” PACs, supposedly for each Rhode Island city and town. Their registrations all look the same, with no local people on any of the PACs and that includes the Charlestown LORIB PAC.
See if you can find any connection to Charlestown in the Charlestown LORIB PAC:
Levesque uses these PACs to get around the state campaign finance law limiting PACs to $2000 in contributions to a single candidate. Since Levesque controls all the LORIB PACs, he simply cuts checks to endorsed candidates from several of his PACs.
Levesque owns the Brewed Awakenings coffee shop chain and is
a long-time anti-gun control activist. The gun lobby is also heavily backing
his candidates.
![]() |
| Support - LORIB Main PAC |
He set Boisclair up with six LORIB checks totaling $10,500
coming from six LORIB PACs. There’s the Charlestown LORIB PAC of course, plus
the LORIB PACs purporting to be from Westerly, South Kingstown, North
Kingstown, Newport and Block Island.
Levesque also opposes any attempt to tax the rich. He was a
big opponent to last year’s “Taylor Swift” tax that imposes a state levy on
multi-million properties owned by non-residents. He also unsuccessfully fought
this year’s “Millionaire Tax” that imposes a 1% income tax surcharge on
millionaires.
His candidates, including Leah Boisclair, toe that line. They
should have a generic LORIB bumper sticker reading “Don’t regulate guns. Don’t tax the
rich.”
Levesque
has targeted nearly every Democratic woman legislator in South County
because their progressive stances. He is bankrolling opponents to our state
Senator Victoria Gu as well as South Kingstown Dems Teresa Tanzi, Carol
McEntee, Alana DiMario, Kathy Fogarty and Bridgette Valverde.
Sen. Alana DiMario and Rep. Kathy Fogarty, both targeted by
Levesque, introduced legislation to close what ought to be called the “Levesque
Loophole” (2026-S
2720, 2026-H
7450) by extending
the $2000 limit to apply to multiple PACs that have the same owner.
Unfortunately, that legislation did not pass.
Finally, Boisclair’s land use legal work ought to earn her
the opposition of the Charlestown Citizens Alliance (CCA), especially this case
that was covered by ecoRI (CLICK
HERE). So should Jim Mageau’s support for Boisclair.
Those are the negatives. Let’s look at your positive
alternative
Why you should vote for Tina Spears
| Here's where I stand. Photo by Will Collette |
Tina points
to these achievements from the recently completed General Assembly session:
We were able to make life in
our community better by:
·
Fully funding library aid
·
Increasing education funding,
especially for special education
·
Securing funding for the
Charlestown Breachway rebuild
·
Passing the South Kingstown
High School bond
·
Advancing legislation allowing
New Shoreham to increase landing fees, manage its water district, and better
structure its taxing authority.
I am especially proud to have sponsored and
passed two bills:
The Act on Coasts provides Rhode Island with a roadmap to strengthen coastal
infrastructure in the face of rising seas. Rather than debating the causes, I
am focused on preparing our communities, particularly in District 36, for the
changes we are already seeing along our coastline
The Purple Alert establishes an early alert system when individuals with
disabilities go missing, making Rhode Island one of a small number of states to
prioritize this vulnerable population. In partnership with advocates, families,
and public safety officials, we turned a tragic situation into meaningful
action that strengthens our public safety response and saves lives.
Tina has a long
record of community service, while Boisclair has none. Tina often teams up
with other legislators such as state Senator Victoria Gu to boost her ability
to get bills passed. She meets often with voters in her district. On top of
that, she’s a genuinely kind and warm-hearted person.
Vote for Tina Spears in the September 9 Democratic primary. You must be a registered Democrat to vote in this primary.
And Tina DOES NOT protect pedos.
How often do people pass gas?
There's now an app for that
By Sanjukta
Mondal, Medical Xpress
Edited by Sadie Harley,
reviewed by Robert
Egan
![]() |
| In his case, constantly |
It is, however, an essential
bodily function that allows the digestive system to keep pressure within the
intestinal tract low and prevents painful stretching of the stomach and
intestines. Even though it is normal to fart, it remains unclear what counts as
a healthy number.
A study by researchers from the Commonwealth Scientific
and Industrial Research Organisation wanted to measure how many times people
pass gas in a day. So they designed a mobile phone application, Chart Your
Fart, that allowed more than 6,400 Australians to log their farting patterns in
real time.
They found that most people, on average, passed gas five
times a day, with men doing it more often than women. Flatulence patterns were
not the same throughout the day.
They observed a gradual increase that typically peaked
between 6 p.m. and 10 p.m., coinciding with the time when people generally
consume the most calories and fiber.
The findings are published in JAMA Network Open.


.webp)















