Scientists found that 10 different healthy diets were linked to slower biological aging

There's more than one way to eat your way toward healthier aging

DZNE - German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases

A large study involving approximately 7,500 people suggests that eating a healthy diet may help slow biological aging, and there is no single eating plan that stands above all others. Scientists at the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) investigated 10 different dietary patterns, including the Mediterranean, Nordic, plant-based, and DASH diets. The DASH diet was specifically developed to help reduce blood pressure.

Every dietary pattern examined was associated with slower biological aging, as measured by chemical changes in DNA that reflect the body's aging process. The findings were first identified using data from DZNE's Rhineland Study and then independently confirmed in another population. The research was published in Nature Communications.

"Our study suggests that healthy eating goes hand in hand with slower biological aging. The effects are not massive, but they are measurable and relevant for prevention. By slowing the aging process, the risk of age-related diseases such as dementia or cardiovascular disorders can be reduced. Thus, healthy eating contributes to healthy aging," says Prof. Monique Breteler, Director of Population Health Sciences at DZNE and head of the Rhineland Study. 

"Importantly, there is probably no single 'correct' diet. According to our data, various dietary patterns are associated with slower aging, some more, some less. That is an encouraging finding, because it leaves room to tailor healthy eating to personal and cultural preferences, budget and taste."

And all dark sky lovers clutch their pearls

An American startup wants to sell sunlight after dark. Who gets a say?

Richard de Grijs, Macquarie University

A US startup has booked two Indian rocket launches to test a planned service no company has sold before: sunlight at night.

California-based Reflect Orbital plans to place giant mirrors in low-Earth orbit, and use them to steer reflected sunlight onto selected locations on the ground.

The company wants to sell space-based illumination for a wide range of purposes, from keeping solar farms generating energy after sunset to search-and-rescue operations. Its first orbital demonstrator, Eärendil-1, will carry an 18-by-18-metre reflector.

Using space mirrors to deliver useful illumination will require overcoming formidable engineering challenges. But there’s another pressing question: who will decide where sunlight redirected from space is allowed to hit the ground?

Does candidate for US House District 2 Victor Mellor really live in Rhode Island?

Let’s look at the records and you can judge for yourself

By Will Collette

QUICK FACTOID: As of 4 PM Friday, October 30, more than a quarter of Charlestown's 6805 active registered voters (1778) have either cast early or mail-in ballots. That includes me (and Cathy). 

Florida MAGA guy Victor Mellor used to live in Rhode Island but left for Florida 30 years ago after charges of domestic assault. There he lives in a gated MAGA compound called “The Hollow” that he built himself.

For some reason, he decided last year to file a declaration of candidacy with the Federal Election Committee to run against incumbent Democratic US Representative Seth Magaziner. His initial filing was on November 1, 2025, and listed his address as 54 Burnett in Warwick:

However, this is somebody else’s house:

Mellor filed an amended form with the FEC on February 2, 2026, listing his residence as 1276 Bald Hill Road in Warwick:

Except that’s a storefront in a shopping center owned by an LLC in Fall River:

Now, remember that Mellor is a registered agent for the government of Cuba, a puzzle Mellor has never adequately explained, on June 26, 2026. He lists the Burnett Road Patterson family home as his business address and his Florida address as his home address. 

Note the timing: this Justice Department filing was four months AFTER his amended filing with the Federal Elections Commission. They contradict each other. 

Looking at Sarasota County, Florida’s tax assessor’s records, it sure looks like Vic and his wife are actively living at that Gnarled Road address in Englewood, Florida.

Can anyone point to where Victor Mellor actually lives? Is it the shopping center on Route 2 in Warwick? The basement of the Patterson family’s home? Or his compound in Florida?

Boo!

Don't be surprised if Trump orders THIS ballot to be impounded

JD Vance urges you to vote for Democrats in the mid-terms

Scientists Find That Cats and Their Owners Share a Surprising Biological Connection

Cats often relish close physical contact

By Kyoto University

The comfort you find in a cat’s company may have less to do with years together than with everyday closeness, a small observational study suggests.

Cat owners often credit their pets with making life better, but research has produced mixed evidence about whether owning a cat benefits human health and well-being. Some studies have found positive effects, while others have reported possible negative ones.

Researchers at Kyoto University wondered whether those differences might reflect the quality of the relationship between people and their cats, particularly their everyday interactions. 

To investigate, the team followed the daily lives of 29 cats and their 19 owners for one month, recruiting participants through flyers and social media. They assessed owners’ moods through questionnaires and observed how the cats behaved toward their owners and unfamiliar people.

To measure everyday physical closeness, the researchers attached small Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) beacons to the cats’ collars. Owners who spent more time physically close to their cats tended to report more positive feelings. How long they had owned their cats, however, was not associated with those positive mood states. The distinction suggests that daily contact may matter more to this aspect of owners’ well-being than the length of the relationship.

Farewell, Captain

 Fellow activist and cat person

Cathy and I first noticed him for his excellent performance in the 1976 BBC series, I, Claudius when he still had a full head of hair:

In lieu of flowers, memorial contributions may be made to: Johns Hopkins Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center Fund https://alzresearch.org/giving/ or Alzheimer’s Foundation of America Caregiver Resources https://alzfdn.org/donate/

What legal experts say about the Trump administration’s attempts to make a federal case out of state elections

How far will Trump push it?

Naomi Schalit, The Conversation

The Trump administration’s lawsuit against Alaska, which seeks to block certification of the U.S. Senate results there if the GOP candidate does not win, is the latest in a long series of actions throughout 2026 in which the administration has attempted to wrest control of federal elections from states.

In the Alaska case, the U.S. Department of Justice, directed by President Donald Trump, claims that it aims to “protect the integrity of the 2026 Senate election in Alaska.” 

If incumbent Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan does not win reelection in a close vote, the DOJ asserts, it’s likely the result of voter confusion because another candidate with a very similar name – Daniel J. Sullivan, with no party affiliation – is on the ballot, too. So in the event that Sen. Sullivan fails to win reelection, the DOJ demands that Alaska not certify the election and instead should conduct an inquest into who voters thought they were voting for.

The campaign of the Democratic candidate, Mary Peltola, whose potential win in the hotly contested election could help shift the Senate to Democratic control, has called the lawsuit “wholly baseless” and “an unprecedented pre-emptive strike on democratic elections” in a court filing. Another filing states that the DOJ lawsuit “asks the Court to preemptively nullify Alaska’s U.S. Senate election and disenfranchise Alaska voters without any legal basis whatsoever. It seeks to go where law ends.”

There’s lots of other heated language in the case’s legal filings. But colorful language and legal citations are a much longer way of articulating a simple fact: The U.S. Constitution gives the president no authority over federal elections. That authority rests with the states and, to a limited degree, with Congress.

Over the past year, as the 2026 midterm elections approached, The Conversation has published a number of stories illustrating this fundamental constitutional rule. Here is a selection of them:

Trump Tells Voters They Couldn’t Even Afford a Burger at His Private Club

And they feel so much better

Jake Johnson for Common Dreams

Big mistake to let him near sharp objects

Donald Trump, whose policies have significantly driven up food costs during his second term, said at a Texas campaign rally on Tuesday that voters likely wouldn’t even be able to afford “a hamburger and a small dessert” at his private Mar-a-Lago resort, remarks that came amid a worsening national hunger crisis fueled by Republican cuts to federal nutrition aid.

Trump made the comment in the context of his farcical pledge to send every American adult a $5,000 check if Republicans retain control of the US Congress in next month’s midterm elections. “The problem,” Trump said, “is that for $5,000 the most you’ll be able to buy is a hamburger and maybe a small dessert. I’m not even sure you could buy that.”

“No, don’t go there,” the billionaire president said of Mar-a-Lago, where he frequently hosts rich allies and donors. “That’s not a good place if you’re price-conscious.”

Watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAtdk0Om3mY

“Working people are struggling to make rent and pay for groceries, and President Trump wants to sell you a $5,000 hamburger at his private golf club. (Fries and a drink extra.),” the AFL-CIO wrote in response to the president’s remarks, which drew laughter from the audience gathered in Corpus Christi.

Who loves, ya?

It's funny to see how much communist leaders Putin, Xi and Kim rate as Donald Trump's trusted and dear friends, while Trump sends out fund-raising pitches offering donor's this free membership:

This was in Trump's e-mail pitch to me:

"After careful consideration, I want to present you with the ANTI-COMMUNIST CLUB Membership! It’s the highest honor I can bestow upon such an important supporter who DESPISES the radical left!"

Don't be like them

AI recaps Charlestown Town Council Oct. 26 meeting

Council Advances Ninigret Park Cell Pole, Reshapes Farm Committee

Adriana Vossari, RI & Local Government, is NOT an actual person but rather is an AI-bot used by UpriseRI to review and summarize public records. Click here for their explanation for how this is done: How we report meeting stories →

Charlestown, R.I. — The Charlestown Town Council voted 4-0 at Monday night's meeting to move forward with a Verizon Wireless cell facility at Ninigret Park, directing the town solicitor to rewrite the deal as a concession agreement and address questions about overhead wires, possible grave sites and lighting. That is according to the Charlestown Town Council's published meeting recording.

The council also updated the membership rules for the Charlestown Agricultural Preservation Committee, approved a Charlestown Land Trust cleanup at Ninigret Park on Saturday, Nov. 7, and passed its consent agenda. Councilor Stephen Stokes was absent, so every vote was 4-0. The meeting lasted roughly 17 minutes.

The meeting opened with a moment of silence for Libby Bray, the town's assistant emergency management director, who the council president said was in charge of the special needs registry.

Ninigret Park cell facility

The item concerned an agreement between the Town of Charlestown and Cellco Partnership, doing business as Verizon Wireless, to install, operate and maintain a wireless communications facility at the park at no installation or maintenance cost to the town, according to the agenda.

The council president said the matter "has been percolating a while." The agreement was drafted as a lease, but the president said that since the park's utilization plan was approved, the town is now required to use concession agreements instead of leases.

Councilor Bonnie Van Slyke, who said she was not on the council when the matter was discussed before, raised several questions. She asked whether the National Park Service had been contacted, and said graves in that area of the park had come up during the master plan. Van Slyke said the spot is probably not in the 10-foot square, but the town should check. A speaker responded that the spot has already been designated but that they could check.

Van Slyke also pointed to language in the draft allowing overhead utility wires. A speaker said that area of the park is wired underground and that there would be no overhead wires. She also asked about commercial liability insurance, and a speaker said they would check with the trust.

Van Slyke asked why the equipment would go in the park rather than on the tower at the police station. In response, a speaker said portable units are typically brought in for large park events, that Verizon service at the park is poor, and that a permanent facility would help public safety services there. A speaker said the pole would be 40 feet or higher and that there should be no lighting on it.

Councilor Craig Marr moved to authorize the town solicitor to convert the document into a concession agreement and to address the overhead wire language, inspection of any grave sites, and a provision for no permanent lighting. Van Slyke seconded. Town Solicitor Peter Ruggiero said he was comfortable with the direction. The motion passed by voice vote, 4-0.

‘Voting is medicine’: These health professionals want you to vote in the midterms

Your vote matters

By Neha Pathak, Yale Climate Connections

When wildfire smoke drifts over a city or a heat wave blankets a community, doctors and nurses see the results firsthand. Asthma attacks, heart attacks, strokes, and heat-related illnesses surge.

Dr. Cynthia Mahoney, a retired California internist and nephrologist, helps lead Climate Health • Civic Health, an all-volunteer alliance of health professionals and organizations, alongside colleagues Margie Chen and Karina Maher.

Yale Climate Connections spoke with Mahoney about how climate change affects our health, why data centers have galvanized action, and what readers can do leading into Election Day.

The interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Yale Climate Connections: How does climate change affect people's health?

Dr. Cynthia Mahoney: Climate disruption and fossil fuel pollution impact our health from cradle to grave, and it's going to get much worse unless we change course now.

Think of a worker who collapses in 105-degree heat and ends up in the hospital. That's going to get worse. That's climate change.

What's so unique about climate change is that it's going to impact all of us. It puts us all in this together.

YCC: You practiced in intensive care units. Does that shape how you see this problem?

Mahoney: I was trained as a nephrologist and practiced a lot in ICUs. What I prided myself on was not just treating what I saw in front of me, but asking, "Where is this patient going? How do I intervene now to keep them from deteriorating?"

This is an ICU moment. The health of the people on Earth needs ICU-level care. We see where this is heading, and we need to intervene.

YCC: Why do you want people to vote?

Mahoney: Democracy is the way we change direction.

A lot of young people think, "Look what I've lived through. Voting hasn't helped me. Why should I bother?" Some people are cynical: The politicians are just in it for the money. There may be some truth to part of that. But that is furthering the goals of the people who are trying to corruptly extract our health from us. If voting wasn't important, they wouldn't be trying that hard to suppress it.

Trump’s FEMA Head Tells States to Prepare to Handle Disasters on Their Own

We have a federal government to handle problems too big to be managed locally

Trump tells campaign crowd no FEMA support unless they elect Republicans.

Stephen Prager for Common Dreams

As the climate crisis intensifies extreme weather events, Donald Trump’s head of federal disaster relief sent a stark message to states: You’re on your own.

Politico reported that Cameron Hamilton, the administrator of the US Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), told state officials at the National Emergency Management Association’s annual meeting in Little Rock, Arkansas, that they would need to allocate resources to respond to most disasters without help from the federal government.

“Every state must have the appropriate financial reserves” and other abilities “to ensure that recovery efforts can start immediately and not necessarily be held up simply because of the federal [disaster] declaration process,” Hamilton said, according to a recording of his remarks obtained by the outlet.

“A future that I hope we would shoot for is one where we wouldn’t require as many disasters because the capability of states is so high and so substantial,” Hamilton added, referring to presidential authorizations of federal disaster aid.

Trump has instituted dramatic cuts to FEMA that have hampered its response to disasters. When Texas faced floods last year that killed at least 138 people, for example, the administration’s spending restrictions delayed FEMA’s deployment of search-and-rescue teams for more than 72 hours, while lapsed call-center contracts left thousands of survivors’ calls for assistance unanswered.