McKee goes all in on fossil fuels with executive order [possibly] delaying renewable energy and plastic industry CEOs standing behind him

Looks like he's written off the Green vote

Steve Ahlquist

Update: Acadia Center, Climate Action RI, Clean Water Action & Green Energy Consumers Alliance respond:

“Governor McKee continues to pin the blame of escalating energy prices on the very tools that serve to protect Rhode Island ratepayers from volatile supply costs and rising delivery costs,” said Emily Koo, Rhode Island Program Director for Acadia Center. “It is a glaring omission to report the costs of clean energy while ignoring all of the cost savings, one of the primary reasons for undertaking the energy transition in the first place. I would be surprised if the local businesses featured at tomorrow/today’s event have not themselves leveraged energy efficiency and solar to lower their energy usage and stabilize their energy supply costs – these are best practices, and they benefit all ratepayers.”

Rhode Island Governor Daniel McKee is responding to the climate denialism and dangerous energy policies of the Trump Administration not by pushing back against fossil fuels and championing renewable energy, but by embracing the logic coming out of D.C. and advancing policies that undermine Rhode Island’s historic 2021 Act on Climate legislation.

Rhode Islanders received a preview of Governor McKee’s new direction (which is not, truthfully, all that new) in his FY2027 Budget proposal. As Acadia Center [pointed out in a recent press release:

“At a moment when federal clean energy support is eroding, Rhode Island should be doubling down on the tools still firmly within the state’s control. Instead, Governor McKee’s FY 2027 budget sadly mirrors the short-sighted policies of the Trump Administration, cutting renewables and energy efficiency and delivering what would be a major blow to Rhode Island’s clean energy economy.”

Read Acadia Center’s analysis here: Acadia Center responds to severe clean energy rollbacks in Governor McKee’s proposed FY2027 budget

Make big bucks with no education

Attention, Karma fans

Release more Epstein files

How much game time is too much?

Study reveals how many hours of video games per week might be too many

By Samuel Jeremic, Curtin University

edited by Sadie Harley, reviewed by Andrew Zinin

Playing video games for more than 10 hours a week could have a significant impact on young people's diet, sleep and body weight, according to a new Curtin University-led study published in Nutrition.

Researchers surveyed 317 students from five Australian universities with a median age of 20 years old.

They split participants into three groups depending on the self-reported amount of time spent playing video games, from "low gamers" (0–5 hours per week) to "moderate gamers" (5–10 hours) and "high gamers" (10+ hours per week).

The team found while low and moderate gamers reported similar health outcomes, results worsened dramatically once a young person's gaming exceeded 10 hours a week.

Professor Mario Siervo, from the Curtin School of Population Health, said the findings suggested excessive gaming was the key issue, rather than gaming itself.

"What stood out was students gaming up to 10 hours a week all looked very similar in terms of diet, sleep and body weight," Professor Siervo said.

"The real differences emerged in those gaming more than 10 hours a week, who showed clear divergence from the rest of the sample."

The study found a decline in diet quality once gaming exceeded 10 hours per week, with a greater prevalence of obesity in the high gamers group, compared to the low and moderate gamers.

Trump's NIH Grant Disruptions Slow Down Breast Cancer Research

With amazing new cancer cures and vaccines on the horizon, now is not the time to cut funding

Martha Bebinger, WBUR 

Inside a cancer research laboratory on the campus of Harvard Medical School, two dozen small jars with pink plastic lids sat on a metal counter. Inside these humble-looking jars is the core of Joan Brugge’s current multiyear research project.

Brugge lifted up one of the jars and gazed at it with reverence. Each jar holds samples of breast tissue donated by patients after they underwent a tissue biopsy or breast surgery — samples that may reveal a new way to prevent breast cancer.

Brugge and her research team have analyzed the cell structure of more than 100 samples.

Using high-powered microscopes and complex computer algorithms, they diagram each stage in the development of breast cancer: from the first sign of cell mutation to the formation of tiny clusters, well before they are large enough to be considered tumors.

He often wears pink ties but not pink ribbons

Their quest is to prevent breast cancer, a disease that afflicts roughly 1 in 8 U.S. women over their lifetimes, as well as some men. Their ultimate goal is to relieve the pain, suffering, and risk of death that accompany this disease. And their painstaking work, unspooling across six years of a seven-year, $7 million federal grant, has yielded results.

In late 2024, Brugge and her colleagues identified specific cells in breast tissue that contain the genetic seeds of breast tumors.

And they discovered that these “seed cells” are surprisingly common. In fact, they are present in the normal, healthy tissue of every breast sample her lab has examined, Brugge said, including samples from patients who haven’t had breast cancer but have had surgery for other reasons, such as breast reduction or a biopsy that proved benign.

The next research challenge for Brugge’s lab is clear: Find ways to detect, isolate, and terminate the mutant cells before they can spread and form tumors.

Rightwing think tank issues shocking report showing immigrants delivered $14.5 trillion surplus to US economy over last 30 years

“MAGA’s claim that immigrants are a drain on government budgets? It’s a lie.”

Jon Queally

A groundbreaking new report released Tuesday details how immigrants in the United States over the last three decades have contributed a massive surplus to the nation’s economy, resulting in a total of more than $14 trillion over that period due to the fact that immigrant families generate significantly more benefits to fiscal health than they take away in the form of benefits received or downside costs.

The white paper by the libertarian free-marketeers at the Cato Institute, not a left-leaning outfit, builds on an existing model developed by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) to create a first-of-its kind analyses to determine “how immigrants, both legal and illegal, and their children affect government budgets” in a cumulative manner.

Looking at 30 years of data, the 95-page report—titled “Immigrants’ Recent Effects on Government Budgets: 1994-2023”—discovered that immigrants overall “generated a fiscal surplus of about $14.5 trillion” over those years. In part, the NASEM-Cato model shows:

• Every year from 1994 to 2023, immigrants have paid more in taxes than they received in benefits.
• Immigrants generated nearly $10.6 trillion more in federal, state, and local taxes than they induced in total government spending.
• Accounting for savings on interest payments on the national debt, immigrants saved $14.5 trillion in debt over this 30-year period.
• Immigrants cut US budget deficits by about a third from 1994 to 2023, and fiscal savings grew to $878 billion in 2023.

For what it's worth, Trump caught taking ANOTHER huge bribe from Middle East potentate

Breathtaking corruption is Trump's business as usual

By Brad Reed for Common Dreams

A bombshell January 31 report from the Wall Street Journal revealed that a member of the Abu Dhabi royal family secretly backed a massive $500 million investment into the Trump family’s cryptocurrency venture months before the Trump administration gave the United Arab Emirates access to highly sensitive artificial intelligence chip technology.

According to the Journal’s sources, lieutenants of Abu Dhabi royal Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan signed a deal in early 2025 to buy a 49% stake in World Liberty Financial, the startup founded by members of the Trump family and the family of Trump Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff.

Documents reviewed by the Journal showed that the buyers in the deal agreed to “pay half up front, steering $187 million to Trump family entities,” while “at least $31 million was also slated to flow to entities affiliated with” the Witkoff family.

Weeks after green lighting the investment into the Trump crypto venture, Tahnoon met directly with Donald Trump and Witkoff in the White House, where he reportedly expressed interest in working with the US on AI-related technology.

Two months after this, the Journal noted, “the administration committed to give the tiny Gulf monarchy access to around 500,000 of the most advanced AI chips a year—enough to build one of the world’s biggest AI data center clusters.”

Pedophile protectors

Cross' Mills Library hosts Valentine concert on Feb. 13

 

Valentine’s Day Concert: The HeartThrobs

The HeartThrobs – Joe Parillo on piano, Ian Reyes on Bass, Doc Wood on guitar and vocal, and introducing Paula Claire on vocals – will be presenting songs of love both old and new, the familiar and the unfamiliar, from the worlds of folk music and jazz.

At the library on Feb 13, 2026, 6:00 pm - 7:00 pm

 Cross’ Mills Public Library, 4417 Old Post Rd, Charlestown, RI 02813-0909

Thank you, Senator Gu!

This week Senator Victoria Gu presented library director Sarah Ornstein with a Senate Legislative Grant in the amount of $1000, to be used to expand Cross’ Mills Library’s ebook collection.

Trump deportation push puts families of the elderly in a deep bind

The Ever-Shrinking Eldercare Workforce

By Cynthia Lien

Javier Erazo remembers lying beside his 93-year-old mother, her small frame helpless as she fell into the late stages of Alzheimer’s disease. He was exhausted from struggling daily to piece together a rotation of paid workers and family caregivers as his mother’s illness spiraled in unexpected ways. “She became more challenging, more confused,” he recalled. But placing her in a nursing home never crossed his mind.

“I will take care of her to the very end,” he had vowed.

During this time, I was Erazo’s mother’s geriatrician. Through the eyes and voices of caregivers for people with dementia, I have learned the value of consistent, quality care at every stage of the illness. In reality, however, finding such care can be arduous.

For increasing numbers of Americans, caring for their aging parents themselves could become their only option. A tsunami of frail elders is surging ahead just as the primary supply of direct care workers — many of them low-paid, untrained, and undocumented immigrants — is being depleted by political and economic forces.

“We have this level of need that’s coming, that we do not have the workforce or the systems to meet,” said Nicole Jorwic, chief program officer at Caring Across Generations, a national advocacy group that supports the rights of caregivers and care workers. “As a society, it’s the back-burner issue, but we’re running out of time.”

The final wave of baby boomers is approaching 65 and the number of people living with dementia in the U.S. will balloon from nearly 7 million in 2025 to 14 million over the next 35 years. Adults newly diagnosed with dementia are projected to reach 1 million per year by 2060, nearly twice the rate in 2020.

This rapid growth in older adults, chronically ill and care dependent, is poised to push America’s long-term care system to a critical tipping point. Already, before the surge, there were not enough workers to care for the aging population — even if those like Erazo had wished to lean on them.

Why aren't more older adults getting flu or COVID-19 shots?

Why NOT take simple, safe steps to save your life?

It's not too late to get your flu and COVID shots, and RSV as well

By University of Michigan

Edited by Sadie Harley, reviewed by Andrew Zinin

National Poll on Healthy Aging data from adults age 50 and over who replied to a poll in late December 2025 and early January 2026 saying that they had not received a flu vaccination in the last six months and/or had not received a COVID-19 vaccination in the last year, showing the main reason why they had not done so. Credit: Emily Smith—University of Michigan

This winter's brutal flu season isn't over, and COVID-19 cases have risen recently too. But a new poll taken in recent weeks shows that vaccination against both viruses lags among people 50 and over, and the national survey reveals key reasons why.

In all, the University of Michigan National Poll on Healthy Aging shows, 42% of people over 50 haven't gotten either flu or COVID-19 vaccines in the past six months, though 29% have gotten both and 27% have gotten just the updated flu shot.

The poll also asked about COVID-19 vaccination since it became available in 2021: 49% of people over 50 said it's been more than a year since their last dose, and 15% said they've never received it.

The leading reason people over 50 gave for not getting updated vaccines?

They didn't think they needed them.

In all, 28% of people over 50 who didn't get a flu vaccine in the past six months, and 29% of those who didn't get a COVID-19 vaccine in the past year or ever, gave this as the main reason.

That's despite clear evidence showing that staying up to date on both vaccines reduces the risk of serious illness and death in older adults, whose immune systems need regular "reminders" with updated vaccines tailored to recent mutations in the viruses.

Coming in second among reasons for not getting vaccinated recently were worries about the vaccines' side effects (19% for flu and 27% for COVID-19), followed by a belief that the vaccines aren't effective (18% and 19%, respectively).

Far fewer (10% for flu and 6% for COVID-19, respectively) said they just didn't think of it. A few (4% and 3%) wanted to wait, and from 1% to 4% cited time, cost, insurance, availability, or eligibility concerns.

TrumpRx Denounced as Corrupt Scheme to Line Pockets of Big Pharma—and Don Jr.

Not many but Don Junior likely to benefit

Jake Johnson

This is its actual logo. Always classy!

Donald Trump on February 5 launched a website, branded with his name, in a purported effort to help patients buy prescription drugs at lower prices.

But experts, watchdog groups, and Democratic lawmakers said TrumpRx will likely do little for consumers—or for the broader goal of bringing down exorbitant medicine costs—while further enriching Big Pharma and potentially lining the pockets of his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr.

TrumpRx.gov, launched in partnership with pharmaceutical giants, points users to direct-to-patient sales platforms hosted by drug companies to facilitate the purchase of an extremely limited selection of medications. For example, TrumpRx’s listing for Farxiga links users to AstraZeneca Direct, where patients can pay out of pocket for the type 2 diabetes medication.

Donald Trump Jr. is on the board of BlinkRx, a prescription drug platform that stands to benefit from the Trump administration’s promotion of direct-to-patient medicine sales. In December, the president’s son reportedly met with top drug company executives and administration officials responsible for regulating the pharmaceutical industry—a gathering hosted by BlinkRx.

Frank Pallone Jr. (D-NJ), the top Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said in a statement Thursday that TrumpRx “not only threatens patients’ health, safety, and privacy, but also likely includes kickback schemes designed to enrich President Trump, his family, and their friends.”

As Insurance Prices Rise, Families Puzzle Over Options

Slaves to health care costs

Lynn Arditi 

New York-based performer Cynthia Freeman, 61, has been trying to figure out how to keep the Affordable Care Act health plan that she and her husband depend on.

“If we didn’t have health issues, I’d just go back to where I was in my 40s and not have health insurance,” she said, “but we’re not in that position now.”

Freeman and her husband, Brad Lawrence, are freelancers who work in storytelling and podcasting.

In October, Lawrence, 52, got very sick, very fast.

“I knew I was in trouble,” he said. “I went into the emergency room, and I walked over to the desk, and I said, ‘Hi, I’ve gained 25 pounds in five days and I’m having trouble breathing and my chest hurts.’ And they stopped blinking.”

Doctors diagnosed him with kidney disease, and he was hospitalized for four days.

Now Lawrence has to take medication with an average cost without insurance of $760 a month.

In January, the cost of the couple’s current “silver” plan rose nearly 75%, to $801 a month.

To bring in extra cash, Freeman has picked up a part-time bartending gig.

Millions of middle-class Americans who have ACA health plans are facing soaring premium payments in 2026, without help from the enhanced subsidies that Congress failed to renew. Some are contemplating big life changes to deal with new rates that kicked in on Jan. 1.

It often falls to women to figure out a family’s insurance puzzle.

Women generally use more health care than men, in part because of their need for reproductive services, according to Elizabeth Tobin-Tyler, a professor at Brown University’s School of Public Health.

Women also tend to be the medical decision-makers for the family, she said, especially for the children.

Stephen Miller for President