How to Take Advantage of the IRA Tax Credits Before Trump’s GOP Kills Them
Bill Mckibben for The Crucial Years

It was supposed to be a steady source of funding that would
last a decade, giving this energy transition time to find its feet, and giving
the U.S. a foothold in the fight with China to determine the future. But in the
course of a few months the White House and the fossil-funded GOP Congress have
overturned all that except the extra gifts to the fossil fuel industry.
(Antonia Juhasz provides the best account yet of all the excruciating
details in Rolling Stone.)
The IRA won’t last a decade. Its funding starts running out
at the end of September—if you’re in the market for an electric vehicle, that
has to be done now. (And there may be some excellent lease deals). And if you’re even considering getting solar
on your home, that needs to happen by the end of the year if you want the tax
credit.
Normally we talk about these things as political
questions—but today I asked a few experts to share their take on what
individual Americans might want to do over the 165 days.
Here’s Cindy del Rosario-Tapan, from the very experienced
Solar United Neighbors (who are sponsoring a webinar later this week to go over the same ground and
more):
- The
impacts of this new law will be severe. We expect the solar market to
shrink significantly and will readjust over time. It’s likely many
companies will have layoffs or go out of business in the near-term.
- Our
advice to homeowners is to act now:
- If you
are a homeowner and planning to pay cash or finance your system through a
loan, we highly recommend you go solar in 2025 to benefit from the tax
credit and that you do so soon. Homeowners should proceed with caution and
consult a tax adviser to determine the extent to which their project is
eligible.
- The
safest way to ensure your project will qualify for the tax credit is to
have it “placed in service” before the end of 2025. “Placed in service” is
a gray area, but a conservative interpretation would be when your system
is ready to be connected to the grid.
My old 350.org colleague Phil
Aroneanu has been hard at work at Climate United trying to protect what they
can of the IRA funding. He breaks it down a little further:
If you're hoping to put solar on the roof of your home, and
you want to own the system (not lease it), the 30% residential clean energy tax
credit (25D) will sunset at the end of 2025, 10 years sooner than what was
written into the Inflation Reduction Act.
If you own a business or nonprofit, or work at a school or city government
agency and want to install solar OR you want to lease a solar array for your
home rather than own it outright, you'll need to get started as soon as
possible to qualify for the up to 60% investment tax credit (48E) and bonuses
available.
Onerous restrictions will kick in by the end of 2025 making it more difficult to claim the tax credits for projects that aren't yet under construction—and the Trump administration just released an Executive Order that will add even more red tape to these tax credits.
If you're hoping to buy and electric vehicle, the tax credits expire on September 30, and if you're planning to install heat pumps, windows, or take other energy efficiency measures, most of those tax credits expire at the end of the year.
And here’s Andrea Karelas from RE-Volv, a
group that helps nonprofits go solar. (He’s also the author of the
excellent Climate
Courage), who analyzes it from the point of view of an average
homeowner or project sponsor
So basically, before the big terrible bill, thanks to the IRA, if you went solar in the U.S., you got an Investment Tax Credit for your system worth 30% of the value (for storage as well) as a base amount and that credit would have been in place through 2032.
So if your solar system cost $10K, you'll have $3K less taxes to pay next April, so essentially your system is only $7K. Then there are bonus adders that stack based on certain criteria. If your project is in an "energy community" (which basically is a place that has been historically impacted by fossil fuel production, or has many people working in energy production), you get an extra 10%.
If you are in a low to moderate income community you are eligible for a 10-20% adder (but those are first come first serve). And if your equipment is made using majority domestic content (which is basically impossible) you'd get another 10%.
So the
solar ITC for residences (25d) or non-residential (48e) start at a minimum of
30% savings. If someone qualified for all the bonus adders, it would be 70%
covered by the ITC. Many of our projects, for example, get 40 or 50% because
they are in an energy community and serve an LMI population.
Now, thanks to the big terrible bill, the residential credit (25d) will expire
Dec 31 2025. So basically your system price goes up by a minimum of 30% if you
don't have it fully installed before January 1 2026. (And you could be missing
out on up to 70% of the system cost covered if you qualify for the bonus
adders.)
Now, the nonresidential credit (48e) on paper looks like it gets a better deal
because you can theoretically get project construction started a year from when
the bill was signed (so July 4 2026) or get it completed by the end of 2027.
BUT they also added requirements regarding Foreign Entities of Concern to limit
the use of Chinese parts or equipment that are so unworkable that it makes the
ITC unusable, even with these extended timelines. The FEOC requirements kick in
January 1 2026. So in essence, nonresidential projects now also have a December
31 2025 deadline.
All of this would be easier to navigate with devoted help
from blue state officials: Here, for instance, is some good advice from
NYSFocus on how New York Gov. Kathy Hochul could help, and some excellent analysis along the same lines from Noah Ginsburg. But
I think the bottom line is clear—this summer and this fall are the right times
to work with a trusted local provider to get your project up. If nothing else,
it’s a good way to disappoint the GOP and their fossil fuel friend group.
While you’re doing that, of course, we also need to be
standing up for clean energy in general. That’s why we’re hard at work on SunDay.
Part of that work involves the solar industry reinventing
itself for the world past subsidies—which is not impossible. Its old model
won’t work without federal support, but that’s not necessarily the end: Solar
flourishes without much in the way of subsidy elsewhere, in places like
Australia, because they’ve evolved a lower-cost business plan. Permitting
reform is key (and a key focus of SunDay), as Ryan Kennedy makes clear in
this piece from PV Magazine just
yesterday:
Permit applications can cause delays of two to six weeks or
more, causing a poor customer experience and higher project cancellation rates.
Permitting also drives up costs. In New Jersey, for example, permit approvals
and related barriers add an estimated $3,800 to $4,500 to average project
costs. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) said the cost could be in
excess of $6,000 to $7,000 for an average project.
New Jersey regulators, among other states, recently passed legislation to require automated permitting for
residential solar, cutting timelines and costs. Tools like the Department of
Energy’s (DOE) SolarApp+ can facilitate permitting in your
jurisdiction, and DOE provides technical assistance for implementing the tool.
Birch estimates an average U.S. installation could shed $0.98 per W from
automated permitting fixes alone.
Since that hasn’t happened yet, it doesn’t make the
immediate blow any easier. As Aroneanu says:
Multiple recent analyses of
the budget bill estimated that cutting clean energy and
manufacturing tax credits will scale back solar and other renewable generation
capacity by up to 72% in the next decade, raise household electricity prices up
to $290, trigger the closure or cancellation of 331 solar and storage
factories, and erase $286 billion in local investment in American communities,
killing 760,000 jobs in the process.
Make no mistake: The Trump administration is doing everything in its power to
try to kill clean energy.
Still, it seems impossible that American ingenuity won’t
start to figure out some ways, especially since the rest of the world is
surging confidently ahead. (Here, somewhat randomly, are updates from Turkey, Africa, and of course China). As Karelas says:
We know solar is the cheapest form of electrons ever created. Last year 90% of new generation built in the U.S. was clean energy, 78% of it solar. (No wonder they're coming after it this hard.) There are some in the residential space who are trying to make the most of the situation by saying, “Look, the industry had a nice cushion with these tax credits for many years.”
Tax credits also made project financing more complicated—there's a
world where the solar industry bounces back from this after cutting costs,
streamlining various processes, and will be stronger than ever… So, light at
the end of the tunnel, but definitely a terrible blow.
Our job is to magnify that (sun)light, shorten that tunnel,
and not fall any further behind the rest of the world than we have to. So, to
work on all fronts!
© 2022 Bill McKibben
Bill Mckibben is the Schumann Distinguished Scholar at Middlebury College and co-founder of 350.org and ThirdAct.org. His most recent book is "Falter: Has the Human Game Begun to Play Itself Out?." He also authored "The End of Nature," "Earth: Making a Life on a Tough New Planet," and "Deep Economy: The Wealth of Communities and the Durable Future."