Trump makes progress toward becoming history's worst mass murderer
![]() |
Kevin Siers |
"For many LMICs [low- and middle-income countries], the
resulting shock would be similar in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed
conflict," the researchers wrote. "Unlike those events, however, this
crisis would stem from a conscious and avoidable policy choice—one whose burden
would fall disproportionately on children and younger populations, and whose
consequences could reverberate for decades."
A 'staggering number of avoidable deaths'
Scientists in Brazil, Spain, Mozambique, and the United
States analyzed data from 133 countries and territories—including all
LMICs—receiving no to very high USAID support.
The team modeled demographic, socioeconomic, and healthcare
data to estimate the impact of USAID funding on all-age and all-cause deaths
from 2001 to 2021, as well as effects by age-, sex, and cause-specific groups.
Last, they used microsimulation models to estimate the effects up to 2030.
Our estimates show that, unless the abrupt funding cuts
announced and implemented in the first half of 2025 are reversed, a staggering
number of avoidable deaths could occur by 2030.
Higher USAID funding levels—mainly for LMICs in Africa—were tied to a 15% reduction in age-standardized, all-cause deaths (risk ratio [RR], 0.85) and a 32% cut in deaths among children younger than 5 years (RR, 0.68). This indicates that USAID financing prevented 91.8 million all-age deaths, including 30.4 million preschool children, from 2001 to 2021, the authors said.
The financial support was linked to a 65% reduction in
deaths from HIV/AIDS (representing 25.5 million deaths) and reductions of 51%
and 50% from malaria (8.0 million) and neglected tropical diseases (8.9
million), respectively.
Significant declines were also seen in deaths from
tuberculosis, malnutrition, diarrheal illnesses, lower respiratory-tract
infections, and maternal and perinatal conditions. Models predicted that
continued USAID funding cuts could lead to more than 14.1 million excess all-age deaths,
including 4.5 million in
children younger than age 5, by 2030.
"Our estimates show that, unless the abrupt funding
cuts announced and implemented in the first half of 2025 are reversed, a
staggering number of avoidable deaths could occur by 2030," the
researchers wrote. "These results provide essential evidence for policy
makers, planners, and advocates navigating the future of US global health
engagement."
Around 90% cuts to essential public health efforts
USAID, the world's largest funding agency for humanitarian
and development, is estimated to have helped avert more than 91 million
deaths—including 30 million in the pediatric population—over the past 20 years.
It has been funded by high-income nations around the world.
In January 2025, the Trump administration suspended
foreign-aid programs other than emergency food assistance and military aid. In
March, the United States announced the cancellation of 83% of USAID programs.
"These cuts are already being challenged in court, and
the outcome of the process is uncertain, at least for the current fiscal
year," the authors wrote. "Assuming the cancellations stand, this
could include a potential 88% cut in support to maternal and child health aid,
87% to epidemics and emerging diseases surveillance, and 94% cuts to
programming for family planning and reproductive health."
In a news release from the Barcelona
Institute for Global Health, coauthor James Macinko, PhD, of the University of
California Los Angeles, said, "US citizens contribute about 17 cents
per day to USAID, around $64 per year. I think most people would support
continued USAID funding if they knew just how effective such a small
contribution can be to saving millions of lives."