Menu Bar

Home           Calendar           Topics          Just Charlestown          About Us

Saturday, January 3, 2026

Offshore Wind Developers Fight ‘Unlawful’ Trump Admin Attacks in Court

“Trump’s attack on offshore wind is really an attack on our economy,” said Sen. Jack Reed."

Jessica Corbett for Common Dreams

Developers behind two of the five offshore wind projects recently targeted by the Trump administration took action in federal court this week, seeking preliminary injunctions that would enable construction to continue while the legal battles play out.

Empire Offshore Wind LLC filed a civil lawsuit in the US District Court for the District of Columbia on Friday, challenging the Department of the Interior’s (DOI) December 22 stop-work order, which the company argued is “unlawful and threatens the progress of ongoing work with significant implications for the project” off the coast of New York.

“Empire Wind is more than 60% complete and represents a significant investment in U.S. energy infrastructure, jobs, and supply chains,” the company highlighted. “The project’s construction phase alone has put nearly 4,000 people to work, both within the lease area and through the revitalization of the South Brooklyn Marine Terminal.”

The filing came just a day after a similar one in the same court on Thursday from the joint venture between Skyborn Renewables and the Danish company Ørsted, which is developing Revolution Wind off Rhode Island and Connecticut. That project is approximately 87% complete and was expected to begin generating power as soon as this month.

“Sunrise Wind LLC, a separate project and wholly owned subsidiary of Ørsted that also received a lease suspension order on December 22, continues to evaluate all options to resolve the matter, including engagement with relevant agencies and stakeholders and considering legal proceedings,” the Danish firm said. That project is also off New York.

As the New York Times noted Friday: “At stake overall is about $25 billion of investment in the five wind farms. The projects were expected to create 10,000 jobs and to power more than 2.5 million homes and businesses.”

The other two projects targeted by the Trump administration over alleged national security concerns are Vineyard Wind 1 off Massachusetts and Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind. The developer of the latter, Dominion Energy, launched a legal challenge in federal court in Virginia the day after the DOI’s lease suspension order, and a hearing is scheduled for this month.

Rhode Islanders may qualify for settlement cash in beef overcharge settlement

If you purchased beef products between August 1, 2014 and December 31, 2019, you may be entitled to a cash payment from Settlements 

The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota 

Court-Approved Notice.

If you are eligible, you must file a claim by June 30, 2026.

Who Is Included in the Settlement?

You are included—and may be eligible for a payment—if you are a person or entity who indirectly purchased any of the following beef products for personal consumption between August 1, 2014, and December 31, 2019

  • Beef (fresh or frozen) made from chuck, loin, rib, or round primal cuts. More details regarding the different beef products included in the Settlements is available at www.OverchargedForBeef.com.
  • Purchased in one of the following states/jurisdictions (known as "Repealer Jurisdictions" for this case): Arizona, California, District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Massachusetts, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.

"Indirectly purchased" means you did not buy the beef products directly from one of the Defendants. Instead, you bought it at a grocery store or supermarket.

Israel boots Doctors without Borders, other aid groups, from Gaza

Many in Gaza to ‘Lose Access to Critical Medical Care’ as Israel Suspends Doctors Without Borders

Jake Johnson

The Israeli government said that Doctors Without Borders, one of the largest medical organizations currently operating in Gaza, is among the 25 humanitarian groups that will be suspended at the start of the new year for their alleged failure to comply with Israel’s widely criticized new registration rules for international NGOs.

According to the Associated Press, Israel’s Ministry of Diaspora Affairs “said the organizations that will be banned on January 1 did not meet new requirements for sharing staff, funding, and operations information.” The Israeli government specifically accused Doctors Without Borders, known internationally as Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), of “failing to clarify the roles of some staff that Israel accused of cooperation with Hamas and other militant groups,” AP reported.

In addition to providing medical assistance to desperate Palestinians, MSF has been an outspoken critic of what has it described as Israel’s “campaign of total destruction” in Gaza. The group said in a report released last December that its teams’ experiences on the ground in Gaza were “consistent with the descriptions provided by an increasing number of legal experts and organizations concluding that genocide is taking place.”

EDITOR'S DISCLOSURE: Cathy and I have been long-time major donors to Doctors without Borders. They send doctors and medical professionals into war, plague, famine and disaster zones regardless of the risk to render aid to all who need it. Since the October 2023 Hamas attack and ensuing Israeli retaliation, 15 staff have been killed in the fighting.  - Will Collette 

Friday, January 2, 2026

Trump takes his "national security" policies to a truly bizarre level

Make America Weak

David R. Lurie

Trump during his press event at Mar-a-Lago (Tasos Katopodis/Getty) where he announced his plan for a "Golden Fleet" of giant, high-tech battleships at a time when drones are rendering large warships obsolete

The new White House “National Security Strategy” announced that the Trump regime will treat the democratically elected governments of most Western European nations as adversaries of the United States, and unveiled a plan to join longtime adversaries in seeking to undermine NATO and the European Union.

While such a course of action would gravely damage the US, it is of a piece with Trump’s assaults on the nation he was elected to lead.

As the first year of Trump’s would-be dictatorship concludes, it’s clear that the president considers the rules-based democratic and economic order a barrier to his goal of establishing an autocracy. Given his dictatorial ambitions, it makes perfect sense for his regime to cozy up to strongmen while treating America’s principal democratic allies as enemies.

The future of the United States, and likely of many of our allies, will depend on whether Trump’s systematic assaults on democratic nations and institutions here and abroad are successful.

Weakening allies, strengthening adversaries

Trump’s “National Security Strategy” declares that the US will focus on “cultivating resistance to Europe’s current trajectory within European nations.” That amounts to a declaration that America will promote regime change in countries that remain governed by pro-democracy parties that support the existence of the EU and NATO.

In attempting to justify this bizarre remaking of US foreign policy, the “Strategy” complains that the leading democracies of Europe — which collectively represent one of the largest and most prosperous economic zones in the world — are in a state of crisis. It even declares they are at risk of “civilizational erasure,” purportedly because they — perish the thought — continue to permit immigration.

In place of our longstanding and prosperous European allies, the “Strategy” indicates Trump will attempt to build a new core of allies, comprised largely of those European nations that have elected highly nationalist (and in many cases, pro-Russian) governments, such as Hungary. It also implies Trumpers will try to use their newly reconstituted core of pro-Russian European allies as a mechanism for weakening both the EU and NATO, despite the fact that the US is the leader of the latter alliance and has long promoted the former.

In fact, the plan set forth in the “Strategy” document is already being implemented.

For example, Vice President JD Vance and then-Trump acolyte Elon Musk openly meddled in German politics earlier this year by encouraging citizens of that country to vote for the neo-fascist (and pro-Russian) AfD party.

And Trumpers not only valorize the authoritarian regime of Hungarian prime minister (and Trump stooge) Victor Orban, but have used Orban’s actions as models for their assaults on media, educational, and cultural institutions within the US.

Furthermore, Trump is now pressuring Ukraine — over the objections of European democracies — to accept “peace” terms that include surrendering territory in Donetsk that constitutes that nation’s bulwark against Russian invasion of the entire country. 

A Ukraine vulnerable to a complete invasion by Russia will, inevitably, also mean a Europe vulnerable to attack, particularly if Trump withdraws the bulk of US forces from the continent (which he’s already started doing).

Consistent with Trump’s now overt plan to effectively switch sides in Europe, his “peace” envoy Steve Witkoff declared that Russia — which nightly bombs Ukrainian in relentless terror attacks — “remains fully committed to achieving peace in Ukraine.” Meanwhile, Trump’s director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, told a Turning Point USA audience over the weekend that the “deep state,” EU, and NATO are “undermin[ing] President Trump’s efforts towards peace” and scheming to “pull the US military into a direct conflict with Russia.”

If this increasingly explicit scheme to gut longstanding alliances with European democracies “succeeds,” it will not only be potentially catastrophic for Europe, but also for the US — the principal economic and political beneficiary of the post-war international order that Trump and his cronies are assaulting. Indeed, the Trump “Strategy” is entirely consistent with the goals of both Putin’s Russia and China’s authoritarian regime, both of which have long viewed the weakening of the Western alliance as a key part of their effort to displace the US as the leading power in the world.

Accordingly, Trump’s “Strategy” for weakening our allies in Europe is effectively a blueprint for weakening the United States.

The war within

Except you can't come back. Says ICE: "Self-deportation through
the 
CBP Home app is the best gift that an illegal alien can give
themselves and their families this holiday season. It’s a fast, free,
 and easy process: Just download the app, fill out your
information, and DHS will take care of the rest – including
arranging and paying for your travel back home."
This is real, not a joke.
Trump is the first president of any party to make it the US policy to gravely weaken the country’s standing in the world. 

Yet, as the first year of the his second term comes to a close, it has become clear that his efforts to sabotage America’s economic, political, and defense relationships with major democracies abroad are part and parcel of “policies” he’s been pursuing at home — all calculated to make our nation more susceptible to autocracy.

For instance, Trump’s scheme to culturally cleanse the US of the foreign born is succeeding, but at the great expense of the nation.

While he campaigned on a purported plan to “secure the border,” Trump and his acolytes have since made clear that their actual ambition was to gut nearly the entire post-war immigration system.

The scheme has been remarkably “successful” in that — for the first time in decades — Trump has engineered net negative emigration. The problem is that this comes at a grave cost. For decades, immigrants have been a crucial economic engine for the US, allowing our economy to grow and be far more resilient than virtually any peer country.

While Trumpers like Vance celebrate the expulsion of immigrants, contending it “frees up” homes and jobs for those who remain, the reality is that an aging US — one with fewer productive workers — will inevitably become less prosperous. The Trump regime, however, is more concerned about increasing the white and “native born” population for the sake of remaking of the nation. As Vance put it at the recent Turning Point gathering, his movement wants an America in which “you don’t have to apologize for being white anymore.”

Meanwhile, Trump’s assault on trade has empowered America’s adversaries and competitors. He sold his unilaterally imposed tariff “policies” as a means of increasing prosperity at home, and of harming China, the US’s principal economic rival. But in fact, the direct opposite occurred.

The greatest beneficiary of Trump’s moves to hobble the participation of American companies in international markets has been China, which managed to offset many of its declines in exports to the US by increasing exports to other nations, many of them aggrieved by Trump’s actions. In addition, as Trump’s tariff scheme has begun to unravel due to growing inflation and retaliation, he’s rapidly made the US into a supplicant of China — the very nation he initially claimed he would bring to heel.

Trump and his emissaries have been reduced to begging President Xi to resume purchases of soybeans and other agricultural goods that China contracted to buy from other countries at a massive cost to American farmers. They’ve also been pleading for China to resume selling rare earth elements to the US, since limiting the availability of them, as China has been doing, could cripple many industries.

It’s now all but certain that Trump and his cronies will leave America’s role in the international markets that fueled our nation’s growth greatly impaired and diminished. But they are entirely willing to do such damage to our country, apparently because they believe a more inwardly focused (and less prosperous) America will serve their autocratic goals.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, Trump is engaged in a comprehensive assault on the rule of law, once again to advance his dictatorial ends.

The rule of law is not merely an abstraction — it’s an asset that has been critical to America’s status as the center of international business and finance since the end of World War II. The expectation that contracts will be honored and that markets will be regulated in a predictable and largely corruption-free manner has given America a massive competitive advantage over autocratic nations. It has also made the US the preferred site for financial transactions and investments of most every kind, with incalculable economic benefits for the American people.

But Trump views such laws and rules as impediments to his personal power and has set out to undermine them in increasingly overt ways.

Trump’s Department of Justice has effectively stopped prosecuting whole categories of financial corruption. The president has also made a mockery of the nation’s legal system by openly selling pardons, especially to financial fraudsters with whom he appears to have a particular affinity. This activity amounts to an advertisement that the Trump regime is abandoning America’s commitment to adhere to the rule of law.

A glaring example of the administration’s replacement of ordered and regulated markets with a shadowy world of influence peddling is Trumpers’ exploitation of cryptocurrency markets, which Trump’s family and cronies have employed to accumulate what reportedly amounts to billions of dollars in wealth in just a matter of months. 

But for the president, the appearance that government actions are for sale to the highest bidders is a feature, not a bug.

Trump has transformed some of the nation’s largest publicly traded companies into mechanisms for him to extract personal and political benefits. For instance, he recently announced that he plans to meddle in the contest for the sale of Warner Brothers in favor of Paramount, a company now controlled by the Trump-supporting Ellison family, in part to ensure that CNN is transformed into a clone of Fox News.

This is not the first time Trump has interfered in markets to extract personal pecuniary and political benefits — he did the same thing in connection with the acquisition of Paramount by an entity controlled by the Ellisons.

Trump clearly relishes the prospect of replacing the infrastructure of regulatory and law enforcement agencies that have long insulated US financial markets from direct political meddling with an openly corrupt and authoritarian system in which the interests of Trump himself determine winners and losers. But when the rule of law in a country is displaced by arbitrary and unpredictable authoritarian rule, as happened in Putin’s Russia, the results are predictable: investors and companies flee to more stable environs as the economy declines.

The president and his cronies are, however, more than willing to make the US pay a high price for their aggrandizement.

High stakes

A year in to Trump 2.0, it’s clear that Trumpers do, indeed, have a strategy — one intended to weaken America at home and abroad.

A fully Trumped America will be a diminished nation, having squandered the assets of democracy, the rule of law, and a dynamic and growing economy — along with democratic allies — that have actually made America great, all so Trump can obtain the dictatorial control he craves.

In recent weeks, we have seen indications that the majority of the American people are beginning to recognize the depth of the threat Trump poses to the United States, let alone the world. But as his popularity diminishes and his political power becomes more contested, he’s likely to become more reckless and more determined to harm the nation he was elected to lead. Americans, therefore, must be prepared to defend their country with only greater vigilance and vigor.

Time to go

Textbook fascism

Report Shows How Recycling Is Largely a ‘Toxic Lie’ Pushed by Plastics Industry

The hard truth: we simply have to stop producing so much plastic

Brett Wilkins

report published by Greenpeace exposes the plastics industry as “merchants of myth” still peddling the false promise of recycling as a solution to the global pollution crisis, even as the vast bulk of commonly produced plastics remain unrecyclable.

“After decades of meager investments accompanied by misleading claims and a very well-funded industry public relations campaign aimed at persuading people that recycling can make plastic use sustainable, plastic recycling remains a failed enterprise that is economically and technically unviable and environmentally unjustifiable,” the report begins.

“The latest US government data indicates that just 5% of US plastic waste is recycled annually, down from a high of 9.5% in 2014,” the publication continues. “Meanwhile, the amount of single-use plastics produced every year continues to grow, driving the generation of ever greater amounts of plastic waste and pollution.”

Among the report’s findings:

  • Only a fifth of the 8.8 million tons of the most commonly produced types of plastics—found in items like bottles, jugs, food containers, and caps—are actually recyclable;
  • Major brands like Coca-Cola, Unilever, and Nestlé have been quietly retracting sustainability commitments while continuing to rely on single-use plastic packaging; and
  • The US plastic industry is undermining meaningful plastic regulation by making false claims about the recyclability of their products to avoid bans and reduce public backlash.

“Recycling is a toxic lie pushed by the plastics industry that is now being propped up by a pro-plastic narrative emanating from the White House,” Greenpeace USA oceans campaign director John Hocevar said in a statement. “These corporations and their partners continue to sell the public a comforting lie to hide the hard truth: that we simply have to stop producing so much plastic.”

“Instead of investing in real solutions, they’ve poured billions into public relations campaigns that keep us hooked on single-use plastic while our communities, oceans, and bodies pay the price,” he added.

He ate a hamburger and died hours later. Doctors found a shocking cause

Murder by tick

University of Virginia Health System

Researchers at the University of Virginia School of Medicine have confirmed the first known death caused by the condition commonly referred to as the meat allergy, which is transmitted by ticks.

The case involved a 47 year old man from New Jersey who was previously healthy and died suddenly about four hours after eating beef. For months, the cause of his death remained unclear. That changed when Thomas Platts Mills, MD, PhD, a UVA Health physician and internationally recognized allergy specialist, took a closer look. Platts Mills originally identified the condition years ago and continues to lead research into how it affects patients.

ICE Plots $100 Million ‘Wartime Recruitment’ Drive Aimed at Hiring Gun Enthusiasts

It's a big job to recruit brown shirts

Brad Reed

The Trump administration is planning a massive propaganda campaign aimed at recruiting thousands of new federal immigration enforcement officers to carry out its mass deportation agenda.

The Washington Post reported on Wednesday that it had obtained internal documents revealing that US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is planning to spend $100 million over the next year on what the agency describes as a “wartime recruitment” drive.

The propaganda blitz will be targeted at highly specific demographics, including “people who have attended UFC fights, listened to patriotic podcasts, or shown an interest in guns and tactical gear,” according to the Post.

The ICE drive would also use an ad-targeting technique called “geofencing” to send recruitment ads to users’ phone browsers if they are in the vicinity of certain locations, such as military bases, NASCAR races, college campuses, and gun shows.

The ads being designed for the recruitment drive will be based around current appeals that depict joining ICE as part of a “sacred duty” to “defend the homeland” from “foreign invaders,” the Post reported.

This rhetoric is similar to the language used in a recent ICE job post flagged by University of Wisconsin–Madison sociologist Jess Calarco. The listing asked prospective recruits if they are “ready to defend the homeland” by joining “an elite team dedicated to... securing our nation’s safety.”

Calarco noted that the job post “reads like a video game ad,” which she said “is almost certainly by design.”

Sarah Saldaña, a director of ICE under the Obama administration, told the Post that it is worrying to see the Trump administration casting such a wide net for people who lack any experience in law enforcement and who may be eager for what the Post described as “all-out combat.”

The recruitment blitz comes amid new indications that the Trump administration’s mass deportation campaign is falling far short of its goals.

The New Republic‘s Greg Sargent on Wednesday wrote that immigration arrests this year have fallen far short of the goal of 3,000 people per day set by top Trump aide Stephen Miller, and it seems highly unlikely that Miller will realize his dream of deporting 1 million people per year.

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow with the American Immigration Council, told Sargent that “it’s clear that they have not achieved the shock-and-awe campaign of mass deportations that they wanted, and they are still running into quite a lot of obstacles.”

Reichlin-Melnick also predicted that “there will still be millions of people here who are undocumented” after Trump leaves office in 2028, as the administration “will not be able to deport even the majority of undocumented immigrants in four years.”

The Trump administration earlier in the year announced plans to entice new ICE recruits by offering them $50,000 sign-up bonuses and assistance with repaying student loans in a bid to double the agency’s head count.

Thursday, January 1, 2026

New horrors planned by Trump

Shades of Nazi concentration camps 

Robert Reich

According to the Washington Post, the Trump regime plans to renovate industrial warehouses to hold more than 80,000 immigrant detainees at a time.

The plan is for newly arrested detainees to be funneled — let me remind you, with no due process, or independent magistrate or judge checking on whether they are in fact in the United States illegally — into one of seven large-scale warehouses holding 5,000 to 10,000 people each, where they would be “staged” for deportation.

The large warehouses would be located close to major logistics hubs in Virginia, Texas, Louisiana, Arizona, Georgia and Missouri. Sixteen smaller warehouses would hold up to 1,500 people each.

America’s immigrant detention system is already the largest in the world.

With the $45 billion Congress appropriated for locking up immigrants, the regime has revived dormant prisons, repurposed sections of military bases, and partnered with Republican governors to build immigrant tent encampments in remote regions.

“We need to get better at treating this like a business,” ICE acting director Todd M. Lyons said at a border security conference in April, according to the Arizona Mirror. The administration’s goal, he said, was to deport immigrants as efficiently as Amazon moves packages: “Like Prime, but with human beings.”

The logistical problems of converting warehouses into detention camps are significant. Warehouses are designed for storage and shipping of things, not people. They are often poorly ventilated and without precise temperature controls, and they lack access to the plumbing and sanitation systems needed to support thousands of full-time residents.

Beyond logistics is the dehumanization.

Ninety-three years ago, in March 1933, the Nazis established their first concentration camp in what is now Dachau, Poland. Other camps were soon established in Buchenwald and Sachsenhausen.

Initially, the Nazi’s put into these camps Communists, Social Democrats, trade unionists, and others deemed a threat to the Nazi regime.

After the Kristallnacht pogrom of November 9-10, 1938, approximately 30,000 Jewish men were arrested and sent to these camps in a mass, large-scale action that targeted them for being Jewish. The systematic mass murder of Jews in camps designed as extermination camps did not begin until late 1941 and early 1942, as part of the “Final Solution.”

Welcome to 2026

How is Trump's campaign to win the Nobel Peace Prize going?


 

Threatened with military action:

Canada, to turn it into the 51st state

Mexico, to strike drug cartels with or without Mexico's permission

Panama, to seize the Panama Canal

Greenland, to take over the country for "national security" reasons

Colombia, because drugs, of course

Afghanistan, to take back Bagram Airport which was actually built by the Soviets

Plus, imposition of punitive tariffs on nearly every country in the world - but not Russia

Plus, imposed travel bans on dozens of countries

Plus, abandoned Ukraine to Russia aggression.

Trump's latest fantasy at $15 billion-plus a copy

The Golden Fleet’s Battleship Will Never Sail 

Commentary by Mark F. Cancian, Center for Strategic and International Studies

US Navy website, the Golden Fleet

On December 22, Donald Trump announced a new class of “battleships” that will be 100 times more powerful than previous battleships and larger than any other surface combatant on the oceans. The ship’s purported characteristics are so extraordinary that the announcement will surely spark immense discussion. However, there is little need for said discussion because this ship will never sail. It will take years to design, cost $9 billion each to build, and contravene the Navy’s new concept of operations, which envisions distributed firepower. A future administration will cancel the program before the first ship hits the water.

Design: The ship’s design will take many years. At the “30,000 to 40,000” tons cited by the president, the ship is much larger than anything the United States has built in the last 80 years, other than aircraft carriers. The truncated DDG-1000 class (only three built) displaced 15,000 tons but still took 11 years from program initiation (2005) to commissioning of the first ship (2016). The battleship will be more than twice as large and more complicated—nuclear-capable with directed-energy weapons. The first ship, USS Defiant (BBG-1), is likely to commission in the early- to mid-2030s, assuming it is built at all.

Cost: The cost will be extremely high. The DDG-51 class flight III (the current version of this destroyer class) displaces 9,000 tons and costs $2.8 billion each. A ship four times as large would not cost four times as much, but would still be much more expensive. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that a future destroyer of 14,500 tons would cost $4.4 billion or $300,000 per ton. That would imply a battleship cost of about $9.1 billion, allowing for some economies of scale. Lead ships are typically 50 percent more expensive than the average, so BBG 1 would likely cost $13.5 billion, about as much as an aircraft carrier.

The cost might be even higher because of inflation in the shipbuilding sector. For example, building the battleship will require thousands of experienced shipyard workers, even as there is a labor shortage, and shipyards are bidding against each other for personnel....

Read the entire analysis at The Golden Fleet’s Battleship Will Never Sail

Mark F. Cancian (Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps Reserve, ret.) is a senior adviser with the Defense and Security Department at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C. 

The US Navy has created its own surreal website for this “Golden Fleet” at Golden Fleet

Republican Chas Calenda sworn in as interim U.S. attorney for Rhode Island

"MAGA stooge" will be Rhode Island's top federal cop for the next 3 months

By Alexander Castro, Rhode Island Current

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse is not a Calenda fan
For at least the next 120 days, Rhode Island has a freshly appointed federal attorney who will prosecute criminal cases on behalf of the U.S. government and represent it in civil matters.

Charles “Chas” Calenda was sworn in as interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Rhode Island on Tuesday morning. Chief U.S. District Judge John J. McConnell Jr. presided over the ceremony at the federal courthouse in Providence. 

Calenda, a Republican, will act as Rhode Island’s top federal law enforcement officer, representing the U.S. Department of Justice, and work across the street from the courthouse at the DOJ’s local office. 

Calenda (left) bears quite a resemblance to "Newman,"
played by Wayne Knight on the Jerry Seinfeld Show.
Might be why Trump picked him.
“I am proud to be part of this team so we can keep Rhode Islanders safe from those seeking to do us harm,” Calenda said in a statement Tuesday. “I look forward to the important work ahead and will always remember that I served the people of Rhode Island above all else.”

Calenda did not respond to requests for additional comment. But he told The Boston Globe, which first reported his appointment on Saturday, that the interim term will last 120 days, or until someone is found to permanently fill the role. He also said that he will step down from his role as a West Greenwich town councilor. 

When asked Tuesday about the expected duration of Calenda’s term, Lindsay Lague, a spokesperson for the Rhode Island DOJ office, acknowledged the request but could not immediately confirm a definite timeline. 

Without big changes, this is what the environment will look like in 2050

Self-destructive policies must be turned around

United Nations Environment Programme

Oppressive heat. Species extinctions. Pollution-choked skies.

This is the future that awaits the world unless humanity takes dramatic steps to end a series of mushrooming environmental crises, finds a new report from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).

The seventh edition of the Global Environment Outlook (GEO-7) offers a stark vision of the decades to come. But its authors say the worst forecasts can still be avoided if countries quickly take meaningful steps to address climate change, nature, land and biodiversity loss, and pollution and waste.

“With a whole-of-government, whole-of-society effort humanity can still turn the ship around,” says Maarten Kappelle, Chief of Service in UNEP’s Office of Science. “But if countries continue to drag their collective feet, billions of people will face an uncertain future, especially those in the developing world.”

GEO-7, the work of nearly 300 scientists, created a model of what the planet would look like in 2050 if nations continued to do three environmentally destructive things: pollute, pump out greenhouse gasses and destroy natural spaces. In the first of three stories about the report, here are some of the key findings of that modelling. 

An illustration of a person sitting

Planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions are expected to rise to 75 billion tonnes a year by 2050 – a nearly 50 per cent jump from today. This will destabilize the climate and lead to a surge in heatwaves, which are expected to affect nearly everyone on Earth – some 9.2 billion people – by 2050. Almost no corner of the planet will remain untouched by extreme heat.