By Mattea Kramer
For more cartoons by Pat Bagley, click here. |
Back in
October, Congress ended the 16-day government shutdown that cost this country 120,000 jobs by
appointing a 29-member, bipartisan Budget Conference Committee to broker
federal spending levels.
This was
a necessary first step to passing a budget by Jan. 15, the expiration date they
set for the stop-gap spending bill that’s currently funding the government.
Upon
releasing so-called top-line spending figures for fiscal years 2014 and 2015,
Budget Committee Co-Chairs Representative Paul Ryan and Senator Patty Murray
announced that they successfully crossed the first milestone.
There’s
broad agreement among the general public about what a budget deal should
contain and as we move into the budget debates for fiscal year 2015, let’s hope
that our lawmakers finally pay attention to what they missed in this deal.
National
polls routinely indicate that Americans want Social Security strengthened, with 82 percent choosing to preserve benefits even if
it means raising taxes. As lawmakers move forward, they should listen to the
American people and eliminate the $113,700 taxable limit on wages subject to
Social Security taxes to strengthen and secure the program for generations to
come.
When it
comes to the Pentagon, Americans favor cuts, with voters on average
choosing an 18 percent reduction in military spending when they’re presented
with information about current spending levels.
Yet each
year the military accounts for more than half of all discretionary spending
approved by Congress. It’s imperative that lawmakers heed the advice of a
bipartisan task force that found $1 trillion in fat over the next 10 years
hiding in the Pentagon budget — and start making intelligent reductions.
The
Murray-Ryan deal raises revenue largely through fees and does not contain a
penny of new tax revenue, even though 80 percent of
Americans want to see higher taxes on corporations. Meanwhile 66 percent of
Americans want tax loopholes closed for the wealthy.
And
these loopholes add up to big bucks —they cost the U.S. Treasury hundreds of
billions of dollars each year. In 2013 alone, the tax break for offshore
corporate profits, known as “deferral,” cost the U.S. Treasury $42 billion. That’s five times as much as the
federal government spent on the early-childhood program Head Start over the
course of this year.
The tax
break for capital gains and dividends income — which overwhelmingly benefits
the top 1 percent of taxpayers — cost the Treasury a whopping $83 billion in
2013. That’s more than the entire food stamp program, which both chambers of Congress appear poised to cut next
year.
During
closed-door Budget Committee negotiations we routinely heard from our lawmakers
that the federal budget is “in crisis.” To use a phrase that Vice President Joe
Biden made famous in last year’s vice presidential debates, that’s a bunch of a
malarkey.
The
federal budget’s crisis is being caused by our elected officials, who have
failed to fulfill their responsibility of passing a spending and revenue plan
that reflects the people’s values and priorities. There’s plenty of common
ground for what that plan should contain.
Just
following the wishes of the American people would strengthen Social Security,
make smart spending cuts, and raise needed tax revenue.
The Budget
Committee legislation tweaked the edges of the federal budget instead of coming
up with real solutions. Americans deserve better.
Mattea Kramer is Research Director at National Priorities
Project and the lead author of the book A
People’s Guide to the Federal Budget. NationalPriorities.org. Distributed
via OtherWords (OtherWords.org)