Rebuild our ability to handle public health emergencies
Federal agencies
tasked with planning for and responding to public health emergencies say they
need a big bump in funding to prepare for future pandemics and antimicrobial
resistance, as well as chemical, biological, radiologic, or nuclear
threats. 
Public health decisions are made by this clown
The
multiyear budget, released July 15, proposes an allocation of
$53.3 billion over the next three fiscal years: 2027, 2028 and 2029. If funding
remains flat, the allocation will be $20 billion, or $33.5 billion less than
requested.
The
Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR), the federal
government's leading health security agency, says the budget is based on agency
professional judgment.
"These
investments will strengthen our ability to develop, manufacture, and deliver
lifesaving medical countermeasures when they are needed most," said John
Knox, ASPR's principal deputy assistant secretary and interim leader, in an
ASPR news release.
The proposed
budget comes at a time when many have criticized the federal government's deep cuts to
preparedness efforts amid the recent hantavirus outbreak and ongoing Ebola
outbreak in Africa.
Most funds would go to biomedical R&D
ASPR received the
lion's share of the proposed budget. Specifically, it requests $33.2 billion
for the next three years to fund ASPR's Biomedical
Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), which develops and acquires medical
countermeasures, including vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostic tools. If
funding remains at 2026 levels, BARDA will receive $5.3 billion, or $1.8
billion per year.
BARDA funding
would jump from $1.8 billion for fiscal year 2026 to $13.7 billion in 2027,
$8.5 billion in 2028, and $11.0 billion in 2029. ASPR funding for the Strategic
National Stockpile for housing drugs, vaccines, and other supplies for
emergencies would increase from $750 million this year to $2.1 billion in 2027
and 2028 and $2.3 billion in 2029.
The budget also
proposes a funding boost for preparedness at the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC). Over the next three years, the allocation would be 388%
higher compared to if funding remained flat. The budget also recommends just a
2.8% increase for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and flat funding for
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
These three
agencies, along with ASPR, are part of the US Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS), and each plays a role in responding to emerging public health
threats.
With highly
pathogenic avian flu, for example, the budget says that the NIH would support
vaccine trials and studies of new therapeutics, ASPR would improve and sustain
domestic manufacturing capabilities of these vaccines, and the CDC would
monitor for emerging viruses.
The budget
doesn't outline a cohesive action plan for emergency preparedness, said
Prashant Yadav, a senior fellow for global health at the Council on Foreign
Relations and an expert in medical countermeasure manufacturing, procurement
and distribution.
Diffused
responsibility and insufficient coordination create competing interests among
agencies, which, Yadav argued, prevent the federal government from setting
clear priorities, especially if Congress doesn't grant the full budget
request.
"It will
require making some tough choices," he said.