By Marc
Abrahams in Improbable Research
“On the Reception
and Detection of Pseudo-Profound Bullshit,”Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne, Nathaniel Barr, Derek J. Koehler, and Jonathan A. Fugelsang, Judgment
and Decision Making, Vol. 10, No. 6, November 2015, pp. 549–563. The
authors, at the University of Waterloo, explain:
“Although bullshit is common in everyday life and has attracted
attention from philosophers, its reception (critical or ingenuous) has
not, to our knowledge, been subject to empirical investigation.
“Here we focus on pseudo-profound bullshit, which consists of
seemingly impressive assertions that are presented as true and meaningful but
are actually vacuous.