Van Slyke must answer for CCA’s glaring financial
blunders that she helped to create
By Will Collette
 |
Loving animals and nature is not this election's key issue, but money management is |
The Charlestown Citizens Alliance (CCA) retread candidate
Bonnita B. Van Slyke in the December 2 town council special election just
issued a piece in the CCA blog that reprises her promises to support a
broad array of environmental issues, the same ones she covered at length in her big, fancy
mailer.
Her two opponents, Democrat Jill Fonnemann and Republican
Laura Rom, also believe in protecting our environment – clean water, healthy
ponds and streams, dark skies, and all our critters and birds. Jill is
especially strong on animal protection. The candidates differ on how to achieve
our goals, but don’t differ on the goals themselves.
So let’s stipulate that all the candidates love our town and
its beautiful environs. And dogs.
The real difference between Van Slyke and her rivals comes into
sharp relief when you look at her record on how to manage the taxpayers’ money.
Van Slyke makes two “promises” that are belied by her actions and omissions.
Van Slyke pledges “to provide open, honest, responsible
leadership” and commits to “manage our town’s administration and budgets
effectively” which she failed to do during her previous time on the Town Council.
Bonnie B. left the Town Council in 2022 at the height of
Charlestown’s worst financial scandal in a generation, a crisis where she was
one of the key architects and led the cover-up and misinformation campaign.
And in her own writings for this special election, she still
is.
In 2022, Charlestown learned that under the total control of
the Charlestown Citizens Alliance, Charlestown had not only achieved the dubious
distinction of having the highest administrative costs in the state but
that this CCA-controlled administration had “lost” (they say “misallocated”) $3
million for two years. The “$3
million oopsie.”
Van Slyke was the CCA’s principal spokesperson leading the
cover-up and disinformation campaign to deny there was a problem and, failing
that, blame someone else while refusing
reasonable requests for an outside, impartial review.
Van Slyke pushed – and still pushes – pumping
up the town’s surplus (“Unassigned fund balance”) beyond any reasonable need.
The $3 million oopsie grew out of the accumulated pockets of cash the CCA had
squirreled away in the town budget often used to finance Planning Commissar
Ruth Platner’s shady land deals.
Van Slyke praised and defended ex-Town Administrator Mark
Stankiewicz even though he failed at his #1 job which was to take care of the
money. Instead, he presided over ending legal public access to records about
the town’s finances and shady land deals and allowed the $3 million to get lost.
Then Stanky and ex-Budget Commission Chair Dick Sartor did their own self-audit
and of course found themselves blameless.
Van Slyke consistently obstructed every effort by then
minority Council member Deb Carney to bring in an outside forensic auditor to
find out what really happened and to fix it.
And did I mention that according to the RI Public
Expenditure Council, Charlestown’s administrative costs
peaked as the worst in the state per capita during the final year of CCA's reign? We're right there at the very bottom of the chart. Here's what RIPEC found (and note that the CCA NEVER even acknowledged this data, never mind acted on it):
Voters threw out the CCA in 2022, electing four of five
Charlestown Residents United (CRU) candidates, leaving the CCA with only Susan
Cooper to wave their flag. Cooper dropped out in 2024 and voters replaced her
with another CRU candidate, giving CRU a 5-0 supermajority.
 |
| Stonewall Stanky, Charlestown's cover-up king |
After the 2022 election, one of the first orders of business
was what to do with erstwhile Town Administrator Mark Stankiewicz, executor of
the CCA’s clamp
down on public records and failed money manager. Right up until Stanky’s
exit, Van Slyke praised his feckless performance as masterful and condemned the
CRU for driving out this superhero.
The facts showed that Stanky’s
only talent was his loyalty to the CCA, but even that turned out to be phony. It turns out Stanky
had already lined up a new job in Berkley, MA even before the 2022 election
which the CCA was expected to win.
While clueless Van Slyke and the CCA were campaigning to
save his job in 2023, Stanky was already out the door and was simply trying to
get the biggest severance package he could. Incidentally, Stanky
only lasted six weeks at the Berkley job before moving on to mess up
Pawtucket’s finances.
Then in 2025, Van Slyke and the CCA repeated the process when
the CRU decided not to confirm CCA-aligned Budget
Commission chair Dick Sartor – a central figure in the CCA fiscal meltdown
– to another term on the Commission. Sartor failed at his job to provide
oversight over Charlestown’s finances and teamed with Stankiewicz to run the
cover-up of the $3 million oopsie.
The CRU wanted him out but naturally, Van Slyke wanted him
retained. Ever the champion of incompetence.
Since the CCA was booted out of office, the CRU-led Town
Council has done a great
job of cleaning up the mess the CCA left. And to see exactly what the CRU did, see what the state's chief auditor found.
According to the Rhode Island Auditor General, in their first year in office, the CRU-led Council improved
Charlestown’s financial management in the following ways:
Raised more revenue.
Under the CCA, revenue was $28 million. Under the CRU, this
increased to $30 million.
Lowered expenses.
RIPEC flagged Charlestown’s highest in the state expenses
which were $31.2 million, more than the revenue collected. Under the CRU,
expenses dropped to $29.8 million.
Increased the town’s savings.
This is the unassigned fund balance (UFB) that the CCA
criticized the CRU for failing to increase. In fact, according to the Auditor
General, the CRU raised the UFB by 17% from the CCA’s $5.3 million to $6.2
million.
Improved pension funding.
Funding to cover future pension costs rose from the CCA’s
$8.3 million level to $8.8 million under the CRU.
Reduced Charlestown’s debt by a LOT.
Under the CCA, Charlestown’s debt was $7.9 million. Under
the CRU, debt dropped to $6 million, almost 25% less.
Erased the deficit the CCA left behind.
According to the Auditor General, the CCA left behind a
DEFICIT of $3,266,029. The CRU erased that deficit and ended FY23
with a SURPLUS of $157,666.
This table on page 16 of the Auditor
General’s report gives the detail:

Not once has the CCA acknowledged these hard facts, sticking instead to Bonnita Van Slyke's false narrative that the CCA was infallible. Oh, she also loves her dog.
Election started today (November 12)
Early, in-person voting has started at Town Hall. If you plan to vote by mail, ask our Town Clerk Amy Weinreich for a mail ballot application. If you've already applied, your ballot should be on the way.
Generally, special elections like this draw almost exclusively from those who pay attention to politics. Turn out is usually very low, maybe a thousand if we're lucky. A three-way race like this is especially hard to predict.
The CCA will spend from its huge treasury built on non-resident cash to send you fancy mailers telling you Charlestown needs to go back to the good old days when they ran things. The financial facts shown above tell a very different story.
Democrat Jill Fonnemann is pledged to support the CRU’s sound financial management for a better, more prosperous Charlestown. Let's move FORWARD, not backwards.