Causing
a stir even though she’s not in town
By Will
Collette with commentaries from Tracey O’Neill and Samuel Howard
 |
Not meant to be aesthetic in nature, large stones provide more protection against coastal storms. (photo by Tracey C. O'Neill) |
Taylor Swift.
Just mentioning her name, especially in a headline, will generate lots of Google
search hits for Progressive Charlestown.
Country music diva Swift is our neighbor, living just a few
miles down the beach in her $17 million Watch Hill mansion, though she really
lives in another dimension of time and space.
Even though Ms.
Swift is not in residence, she’s causing another major stir by building a major
piece of construction on her beachfront, a huge seawall to protect her property
from coastal storms. Lots of property owners along our coast line are
fortifying their properties against the inevitable next big storm. But Swift’s
project is attracting lots of attention, mainly because she’s Taylor Swift and
we’re kinda starved for celebrity gossip in our area.
There has been
some outcry over this project and the official reaction to it. Some charge Swift is infringing on public access rights to the beach. Others say it's not so simple. It’s hard to
predict the half-life of this controversy, but it’s getting a lot of attention.
To get the ball
rolling, please read on for two different takes on the Taylor Swift Wall by two
guest columnists I’ve frequently featured in Progressive Charlestown. The first
is Sam Howard who appears frequently at Rhode Island’s Future. The second is
Tracey O’Neill whose blog OnLinewithTraceyC
offers great coverage on politics and the environment.