Monday, May 25, 2026
New research reveals that midlife in the U.S. is becoming more stressful and less secure.
Middle Age Is Becoming a Breaking Point in America, Study Reveals
Middle age is often portrayed as a time of stability, career peaks, and established family life. It is also tied to familiar stereotypes, from the so-called “midlife crisis” to sudden lifestyle changes.
In reality,
researchers typically define midlife as the period between about ages 40 and
65, a stage that often brings competing demands rather than calm. Many adults
are supporting children while also caring for aging parents, all while managing
careers, finances, and their own health.
New research suggests that, in the United States, this phase
of life has become increasingly difficult in ways that set it apart from other
wealthy nations.
Another study on the positive health effects of coffee
Scientists Discover How Coffee Impacts Memory, Mood, and Gut Health
By University College Cork
Researchers at APC Microbiome Ireland, a leading research center at University College Cork, have, for the first time, closely examined how coffee produces positive effects on the gut-brain axis.
The study, published in Nature Communications and
supported by the Institute for Scientific Information on Coffee (ISIC), shows
that regularly drinking both caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee can shape the
gut microbiome and influence mood and stress.
Although coffee’s benefits for digestion and mental
well-being are well known, the biological processes behind these effects have
not been fully understood. This study explored how coffee affects the
microbiota-gut-brain axis, the two-way communication system linking the gut
microbiome and the brain, using a wide range of measurements.
Candidates for Governor talk taxes and the economy
Gubernatorial candidates Foulkes, Gregerson, Guckian, and McKee speak out at EPI Tax Policy Summit
“What I’m hearing is visionary leadership,” said Weayonnoh
Nelson-Davies, executive director of the Economic Progress Institute (EPI), to
the audience gathered in the Hotel Providence. “The people in this
room want our leaders to be moved, to dream, and to make things possible. We
want leaders who can confront affordability and energy costs, but what does
that mean when we’re making policy?
Front runners Foulkes and McKee
“I’m really inspired by the message that we don’t want a
Rhode Island where we are surviving, we want a Rhode Island where we can
thrive. That is my dream. I’m so competitive. Rhode Island has been my home
state since I immigrated to the United States at 16. I want us to win so bad. I
want that fire in our guts. We can make everyone jealous because they don’t
live in Rhode Island.
“I’m also very grateful to the candidates running for
governor who showed up to not just share with us what they think,” concluded
Nelson-Davies, “but to listen to what the people they might be leading tomorrow
think as well.”
The Economic Progress Institute held the People’s
Tax Policy Summit and Gubernatorial Candidates Reception on Wednesday.
The event brought together residents, advocates, and state leaders to discuss
rising living costs, tax equity, and the state’s financial future. Here’s the
video:
Four candidates for governor, including Helena Foulkes, Will Gregerson, Aaron Guckian, and incumbent Daniel McKee, were provided
three minutes to address those in attendance. The candidates were introduced
by Chelsea Speaks, from the RICJ (Rhode
Island for Community and Justice), and Joseph Ortiz, a “Tax
Justice Ambassador” with ARISE (Alliance
of Rhode Island Southeast Asians).
The following has been edited for clarity.
Helena Foulkes
“It’s been so fascinating to listen to all of this, and I especially love Weayonnah’s call to all of us to be bold. It’s important. It’s easy to think about the barriers, but her challenge to dream big puts us on the map.
“Four years ago, I walked into a room of about 75
carpenters, and I’ll be honest with you, I thought I knew what that
conversation was going to be about: wages, job sites, material costs, etc. Then
the first man stood up and started talking about childcare. He talked about
what it was doing to his family. I looked around the room and watched them nod,
one after another, like he was saying out loud what all of them had been
experiencing for years. That moment has never left me because that man wasn’t
asking for anything special. He was asking for a Rhode Island that works for
families like his, and we have not given it to him.
“The cost of infant care in this state is now higher than
in-state college tuition and the average rent. The people who have been running
this state will tell you we have universal pre-K, but they are not the parents
on the waitlist, the ones who, year after year, get a letter that says there’s
no more space.
“It’s not universal if it doesn’t apply to everyone. Less
than a third of low-income children are enrolled in Head Start or pre-K. That
is not a gap. That is a choice the people in charge of our state government
have made year after year, with a $15 billion budget at their disposal. That
ends with me.
“Earlier today, I announced the Rhode Island Employer Match
Childcare Fund, a $20 million pilot that brings the state and Rhode Island
employers together to share the cost of childcare. Employers who invest in
childcare retain their workers, grow their teams, and build stronger companies.
When families win, Rhode Island wins. I’ll expand tax credits for childcare
assistance, and by the end of my second term, every Rhode Island family will
have access to universal pre-kindergarten, not universal in name, universal in
practice. Childcare is only the beginning because the truth is the squeeze does
not stop there: Rhode Island is ranked dead last in the country in new housing
starts last year. There’s not a single community in this state where a family
making $100,000 a year can afford to buy a home.
“I hear it everywhere I go. People who grew up here, want to
stay here, and love this state are being told by the cost of living that
there’s no room for them anymore. That’s wrong, and it has to stop. My Rhode
Island housing program will build 20,000 new homes and apartments that Rhode
Islanders can actually afford, and the wealthiest Rhode Islanders will pay for
it.
“And we’re done cutting RIPTA one year and then funding it
again in an election year. If people can’t afford to live here and can’t afford
to get to work, it doesn’t matter how many good jobs we attract or grow. I will
invest $15 million in job access transit routes connecting workers to Quonset,
hospitals, and other work sites. No one should have to leave a place they love
because they can’t afford to stay.
“So here’s what I’m asking of you: Do not let them tell you
this is the best we can do. Do not accept taglines that say ‘affordability for
all’ when our state is not affordable. Talk to your neighbors, coworkers, and
the parents on the wait list. Tell them things can be different.
“Sixteen years ago, I lost my mother to cancer. It was the
hardest thing I’ve ever been through, but before she died, she gathered my
siblings and me together, and she said something I’ve always carried with me:
‘Take care of each other.’ That’s why I’m running for governor, because that is
what Rhode Island has always been at its best: Neighbors looking out for
neighbors and people who show up for each other even when it’s hard. That’s the
Rhode Island I believe in, and that is the Rhode Island we’re going to build
together.”
Sunday, May 24, 2026
US researchers say how the Trump administration’s science policies have affected them
Self‑censorship, more stress, tougher recruiting
The American academic research engine has long been the envy of the world. Generally well-funded, labs in the United States have been able to attract the best minds who generate breakthroughs and train the next generation workforce that powers the U.S. economy. But since the start of the second Trump administration in January 2025, new federal policies have destabilized the American scientific enterprise.
The disruption generated by the Trump administration’s funding, DEI and visa policies has been well reported by the media. On an individual level, though, what do academic researchers think of all these changes and how have they been directly affected?
We are researchers affiliated with Arizona State University’s scientist opinion panel survey, known as SciOPS, a 5-year research program designed to monitor, understand and improve how scientists communicate with the public. We wanted to know more about the reality inside today’s universities as researchers grapple with Trump administration policies.
Along with our colleagues, we fielded a survey of randomly sampled members of the academic science community participating in the SciOPS panel. We obtained responses from 280 scientists from several fields, including biology, chemistry, civil and environmental engineering, computer and information science engineering, geography and public health from 131 universities.
Our results show dramatic, mostly negative, effects of federal policy changes on researchers, the research system and American competitiveness.
May 30 open house and free paddling
|
|
Senate passes Sosnowski bill to create medical school at University of Rhode Island
One step closer
The Senate passed legislation introduced by Sen. V. Susan Sosnowski that would establish a medical school at the University of Rhode Island. It’s part of the Senate’s 17-bill package of healthcare legislation centered on supporting Rhode Islanders in crisis, protecting patients and providers, and strengthening the state’s health workforce.Last year, a special legislative commission undertook an
independent feasibility study that recommended the establishment of a public,
M.D.-granting medical education program at URI, and outlined a proposed
four-year, five-phase plan that would culminate in the launch of the program’s
charter class in autumn 2029.
The act (2026-S 3604) would establish the framework to create
the medical school and provide an initial appropriation of $5 million as the
first phase of a multi-year investment for its development.
Foulkes Unveils Phase Two of “Believe in Rhode Island” Economic Plan
Focus on the basics
Helena Buonanno Foulkes shared the second component of her Believe in Rhode Island economic plan. This phase is centered around the belief that you cannot have an economic plan that ignores where people can afford to live, how they can get to work, and whether they have affordable childcare to rely on.
“Rhode Islanders work hard. They deserve a state that works just as hard for them. With the high cost of childcare, transportation, and housing, even good-paying jobs aren’t enough to help lower costs for Rhode Islanders,” said Helena. “Today, I’m proud to announce the second part of my Believe in Rhode Island economic plan, which invests in the services that jobs depend on, like childcare and transportation, so Rhode Islanders can afford to go to work in the good-paying jobs we’re creating in the Ocean State.”
Helena’s Plan for Working Families includes:
- Childcare
and Pre-K that’s accessible and affordable: A Rhode Island
employer-matched childcare fund, starting with a $20 million pilot,
designed to reduce the cost of care for working parents.
- Greater
housing supply and lower housing costs: Helena previously announced
her Rhode Home Program, a comprehensive proposal to tackle our state’s
housing crisis head on by creating a billion-dollar revolving loan
fund—paid for by a marginal tax increase on Rhode Islanders making over a
million dollars—to spur the construction of 20,000 new homes and
apartments statewide.
- Job-access
transit routes: A $15 million first-year appropriation for job-access
routes connecting workers to Quonset, ProvPort, hospital campuses, and the
warehouse corridor. This will include expanded transportation routes and
access to jobs in the ocean economy, allowing workers throughout Rhode
Island to benefit from state investments in a growing industry that
depends on skilled workers to fill good-paying jobs.
Read Helena’s Childcare & Transportation for Working Families plan here.
Saturday, May 23, 2026
Trump and Bobby Jr.'s vaccine cover-up
Why the FDA tried to bury studies showing vaccines are safe
Jake Scott, MD
A spokesman for the Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS) confirmed the withdrawals on the record, saying the studies were
withdrawn because "the authors drew broad conclusions that were not
supported by the underlying data" and that "the F.D.A. acted to
protect the integrity of its scientific process and ensure that any work
associated with the agency meets its high standards."
The studies are public. Anyone can read them. The FDA's own
scientists, working with the active surveillance system Congress mandated after
the withdrawal of Vioxx, an anti-inflammatory pain reliever, in 2004 after it
was tied to increased heart attacks and strokes, produced findings consistent
with every major post-market analysis of these vaccines published worldwide
since 2023.
The work was buried for reasons that have nothing to do with
the underlying data.
What the studies actually found
One of the COVID vaccine studies, involving US adults 65 and
older, was withdrawn from the
journal Drug Safety after acceptance. It analyzed more
than 7 million Medicare beneficiaries who received the 2023-24 vaccine. The
investigators evaluated 14 specific health outcomes, ranging from heart attacks
and strokes to Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), an autoimmune condition that has been
linked to certain vaccines.
They identified one statistically meaningful signal: a small
elevation in anaphylaxis (a severe allergic reaction) following the
Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. After they adjusted for the possibility that some
"anaphylaxis" billing codes did not represent true cases, the signal
disappeared. The attributable risk, before that adjustment, was less than one
excess case of anaphylaxis per million doses administered. The investigators
concluded that no new safety signals had been identified.
Scientists may have uncovered a hidden brain difference that helps explain the thrill-seeking behavior of psychopaths
Not like the rest of us
Nanyang Technological University
Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the team found that the striatum was about 10 percent larger on average in psychopathic individuals compared with a control group.
The striatum sits deep in the forebrain and
plays a role in movement planning, decision-making, motivation, reinforcement,
and how the brain responds to rewards.
Psychopathy is generally associated with an egocentric and antisocial personality pattern. People with strong psychopathic traits often show reduced empathy, little remorse for harmful actions, and, in some cases, a greater likelihood of criminal behavior.
Not everyone with psychopathic traits
commits crimes, and not every person who commits a crime is a psychopath, but
research has consistently linked psychopathy with a higher risk of violent
behavior.
Memorial Day Cookouts Will Be 13% More Expensive This Year on Average Thanks to Trump’s Tariffs, Iran War
A MAGA Memorial Day
Julia Conley for Common Dreams
With the US-Israeli war on Iran pushing gas prices up past $4.50 per gallon and American households already having spent nearly $300 that they wouldn’t have otherwise on fuel, some families may opt to stay home this coming Memorial Day weekend.
A new analysis released Thursday
shows that even without travel expenses, celebrations are likely to be more
costly than they were last year thanks to Donald Trump’s policies.
Both Trump’s assault on Iran—and the predictable result of
the Iranians closing the Strait of Hormuz, a key trade waterway, in
retaliation—and his tariff and trade policies are likely to make the holiday
more expensive, with prices for barbecue classics up 13% on average since last
year, more than four times the inflation rate, according to two think tanks, Groundwork
Collaborative and The Century Foundation (TCF).
Ground beef for hamburgers is up 20%, while Johnsonville
bratwursts are up 28%, Kraft hot dogs are up 12%, and Martin’s rolls are 19%
more expensive than they were in 2025.
Those shopping for produce won’t fare much better, with the
average price of a head of iceberg lettuce up 19% over last year, seedless
watermelon costing 17% more, and six ears of yellow corn costing a whopping 98%
more than it did in 2025.

.webp)
.webp)


.png)






