Failed March 13 attempt
to “flood the zone” sparks slander from CCA leadership
By Will Collette
The Charlestown Citizens
Alliance (CCA) was soundly rejected by voters in the 2022 election. But, not
surprisingly, they still have some tricks up their sleeves to take back power.
One such attempt was
made – and failed – at the March 13 Town
Council meeting where the CCA attempted to “flood the zone” with a large number
of their stalwarts trying to get onto key town commissions and committees.
Such long-time CCA hardcore players
as Bonnita Van Slyke, Mikey Chambers, Ron Areglado, Pete Mahoney and Dick
Sartor made bids for seats on the Charter Revision Committee, Ordinance
Revision Ad Hoc Committee, Town Administrator Search Ad Hoc Committee and Parks
& Recreation Commission.
None were approved
although several applicants with CCA ties, such as veterinarian Dr. Lew Johnson
did win appointment.
Fortunately, there was a
large field of experienced and thoughtful non-CCA candidates to fill the ranks
of these important town bodies. You can see the full list of people who
applied, who was chosen and who was not by CLICKING HERE.
I also encourage you to read their
applications and career highlights by CLICKING HERE.
You really should take a
close look because the CCA has decided to use their failed blitz as “evidence” that
the “Town Council Puts Developers In Charge,” according to the headline in
their blog.
Only
one appointee, Tim Stasiunas, is an active developer. Evelyn Smith, who
was appointed to the Charter Revision Committee, was a developer decades ago. However,
Evelyn has put in more than 20 years on the town’s Affordable Housing
Commission. Evelyn does own an inactive sand pit.
According to the CCA,
any person who owns a business is suspect, as are all attorneys (except the
CCA’s last remaining Council member Susan Cooper of course). By the way, contrary to CCA's claim, Cooper voted to approve Evelyn Smith's appointment.
For some inscrutable reason, about half of the CCA’s
screed rehashes their own tragic handling of the COPAR Quarry
crisis, re-writing history by casting themselves as the heroes rather than chumps.
As readers may recall, a guy who did federal jail time for racketeering, Phil Armetta,
re-launched the Copar quarry on the Westerly-Charlestown line in 2013. He hired a convicted grifter, Sam Cocopard, to run it for him.
All of this had predictable results for the neighbors and the environment as
well as itself. Copar went bankrupt in 2015 after its principals started
stealing from each other.
Even though our own Town
Solicitor advised the then CCA-controlled Council the town has broad police powers
to invoke public health and safety to curb the quarry and certainly to deny them a permit to expand into Charlestown by taking
over the Morrone sand pit on Route 91, the CCA Council decided they needed
state legislation.
They wasted time
dithering at the State House, putting their faith in our useless ex-state
Representative Blake “Flip” Filippi.
As the CCA describes it,
they created an ordinance in 2014 that was “fought and killed by the very people appointed on March 13, 2023.”
That’s a lie. The only quarry-related matters passed by the
then CCA-controlled Town Council during the Copar crisis were a string of
resolutions asking the General Assembly to give Charlestown the authority to
regulate quarries and sand pits.
The CCA withdrew all town efforts to control quarries until years after Copar was gone and then,
they only affected future quarries and specifically exempted existing ones. Charlestown is currently in litigation with the new owners of the Morrone sand pit, fighting over whether this is a new mine or a old "grandfathered" one.
The CCA’s diatribe tries
to convince you that the new Town Council majority are nefarious agents for the
hordes of developers and mining companies with convoys of construction
equipment parked along Route One just waiting for the go-ahead to despoil
Charlestown’s “rural character.” And as usual, only the CCA can save us from
this fate worse than death.
But if you read to the
end of their screed and the comments, the real cause of their angst becomes
clear. They claim the newly appointed committees will “change the town
charter to have an appointed rather than an elected Planning Commission. An
elected Planning Commission has to be responsible to the voters. An appointed
Planning Commission is controlled by the same Town Council that puts developers
in charge of local land use law.”
Rhode Island law
requires Planning Commissions to be appointed. Charlestown is the only
municipality in Rhode Island that still elects its Planning Commissions.
The
state law requires appointment over election to de-politicize municipal
planning. However, the CCA likes things the way they are because it gives their
leader Ruth Platner the role of most powerful elected official in Charlestown.
.webp) |
OMG! A bus stop! The end of Rural Character as we know it |
Behind the scenes, Platner exercises the power to obstruct any land use that conflicts with her vision of "rural character." As an example, she is why Charlestown is the only municipality in Rhode Island that has no RIPTA bus route and doesn't want one.
Foster just got approval for bus service. By the end of the year, RIPTA plans to provide Little Compton and Block Island with van service, leaving Charlestown as the sole hold-out.
The CCA is also lying when it claims the
Charter Revision Committee can just “change the town charter.”
First, any
changes will have to go through an extensive open and public process, including
legal review and public hearings, before Commission recommendations can be approved by the Town
Council as ballot questions which then go to the voters. Even then, the
General Assembly will have to sign off on any charter changes.
This will take time. The
earliest likely time for any proposed charter changes would be the 2024
election.
Speaking of elections,
one of the comments published by the CCA is this one from a person who calls themselves “Audrey":
”Perhaps if
Non-Resident property owners, who pay enormous amounts of Property Taxes to the
Town of Charlestown, such as Summer-Home owners, were allowed to VOTE, there
would be no rapacious Town Council members or Administrators!”
Non-resident voting (based
on property ownership) is unconstitutional but has been a longtime priority for the CCA and its antecedent, the RI Shoreline Coalition.
And then CCA’s Voice
Mikey Chambers chimed in with: “In the end, this Council will probably take
away the rights of the voter to elect their own Planning Commission, decide on
large town expenditures, and to issue grievances publicly.”
For more than a decade,
the CCA routinely purged town commissions and committees of people
insufficiently loyal to the CCA, refused re-appointments and denied
applications from other non-CCA adherents. They saddled Charlestown with commission
members, some incompetent, others hostile to the mission of the commissions on
which they served while rejecting applicants who were obviously more qualified.
Mikey Chambers was among
that motley crew who benefited from CCA’s purges by getting patronage
appointments.
Just about every town
body that wielded any kind of power was filled with CCA sycophants. Looking
back at the November 8 election, it was the CCA’s arrogance in putting their
own political power ahead of the needs of the people of Charlestown that cost
them the election.
Based on their substance-free, fact-challenged whining, it's clear they have learned nothing.